Of course I was talking about the FIRST pass, every idiot could see that at the second he was metres away from being offside... Well, maybe some couldn't, therefore needing to reinforce talking about the first one...
Have you been watching a different broadcast? Iniesta passed the last defender the very moment AFTER the ball was played, that is NOT offside! This offside lie is being spread by dutch fans that can't accept their team being beaten fair and square, THERE WAS NOTHING WRONG ABOUT THAT WHOLE PLAY!
He wasn't. There are quite more than enough videos from the sideline showing him in a just legal position at the time of the passing but you can't find any of those because the FIFA hunts all the clips down like the FIA...
Actually Dr. Marko explained the situation in an interview prior to the race: BOTH wings broke, so it was pretty clear that both drivers would have to use the old wing, but one could be fixed and Newey insisted it be raced... So they gave it to Vettel because he was the faster one in practice...
I think the whole affair(s) surrounding/within Red Bull are greatly exaggerated by the media, and fans (/aussies) acting like RBR killed their pet are no help either...
Oh, and Ferrari will bite their asses for not bringing in Alonso right away - they had the chance to get away with almost no penalty at all, but their hesitation ultimately was their huge loss...
And on a personal note: GO KOBAYASHI! Man of the race for me...
I can only assume you've never tried it and are talking out of your arse... Apart from the added memory footprint - of which TDU's own was way too large to begin with - there was a difference in playback between the cheaper and the more expensive cars, windows up or down made a difference (also to the engine note) and cars that had no radio (like the Caterham) also had no music playing...
So after being disappointed from playing intermediate to someone who didn't want intermediating you came to brag to us that you did another car in three weeks? If your aim is to get people thinking that you getting another "module" into an already existing and extensively developed framework compares even slightly to making and maintaining a sim from the ground up you really need a reality check... Sorry that I can't be more supportive of you...
Yeah, but with a flat left front tyre the car wouldn't exactly be eager to make right turns... I'd say it was just bad luck, none of them to blame really...
I think I know what broke the suspension: Right after the restart, the 3 was the Pug that went waaayyy over to the right on the very bumpy stuff at Tetre Rouge passing those GT2s... Lamy blew it for Bourdais and Pagenaud with his impatience to get by the slower cars...
One, current drivers have found that you can have very much fun trying out new things... More importantly, V8SC changed the enduro-rules so that you can't pair up with your teammate, it's gotta be a guest driver... Sure you could look for young talent (which some teams do), but an international high-profile guest driver will give much more exposure, thus money...
Webber not having time to react is a lame excuse... One bump could have shifted the cars into each other, if he'd left just one meter between them he could have seen the move coming, but he rather took the risk of being the first one to be collected in case something goes wrong... Which it did...
Horner is absolutely right: both played hard ball, took unnecessary risks and as a result let their team down, hugely...
Proof? Right, like those journalists you have none... But another conspiracy sells good, doesn't it?
A car's top speed is reached when the available propulsion is canceled out by the resulting drag... Do I really need to have a mind-numbingly boring and otherwise completely useless strip of road to find that out? Can you think of any challenge such a venue would provide that you can't find in a shorter version on the already existing drag strip?
QFT, the lonely voice of sanity... Ultimately, the team lost out the most from their little powerplay - just when they started to get on top of their reliability issues...
Vettel wasn't on the grass, but on the white line just on the edge of the track... But that's a moot point anyway, since that didn't cause the accident... I also don't see what people read into the fuel mixtures? One car had the lead - thus massive drag - right from the start while the other found a cozy low-pressure bag behind other cars and stayed there... Is it so hard to imagine that the leading one uses more fuel in the process? So Vettel is the new Schumacher, Webber the new Coulthard and RBR the new Ferrari or are you lot maybe a bit paranoid?
Both have done wrong... Webber for provoking an accident by not moving over to the clean ideal line under braking when everyone else did, squeezing his teammate of all cars on the track! And Vettel for expecting his teammate to move over in a race for the championship...
It looked to me like the late Coulthard - technically not doing anything wrong, but provoking unnecessary accidents nonetheless, thus losing out himself big time...
Button and Hamilton showed how it's done - letting each other live when it matters so both can fight another day...
Well, now that you uttered your theory, I'd like to see something backing this up... Apart from the Corvette and the Lotus catching on fire in races in the past 30 days, which were the yearly fiery crashes you're speaking of?
Yes, that's exactly how the notion of "LfS is two years overdue" started... Do you want another wave of nerd rage if we pass this next ETA date as well?
You can say that! Was in the Paddock at the time and wondered why it was so quiet all of a sudden... Then I saw the wreck transported on a flatbed... The whole front end of the car was missing on the driver's side (as you can see on the pictures), and there wasn't even any cockpit left to speak of - the rollcage was hanging from the ceiling, nothing under it... And the flatbed left a trail of fuel through the whole paddock... It took over an hour to weld the guardrails back together... Very nasty accident...