Quote from Drifters Only :

Wtf, why would they even do this...

For pranks?

Last year a plane with 100 right-wing Polish politicians crashed.
No one knows why the pilot changed altimeter pressure to QNH on approach making it useless.

Next day lots of pity for him ("was forced to land"... no evidence up today) and lots of jokes on victims aboard.

Cultural Marxism in reality.

revs up freely..? no way... then it means you are on your speed limit

what happens when your revs drop to idle and then you push the throttle - does it rev up or chokes a bit and gears down?

I tried to read the most of his 2083 Declaration because I was really curious at what moment he went wrong.

There are 2 things striking:
First analysis chapters are really good and precise analytics of cultural marxism and EU. I am really impressed. Not so many exaggerations or fails, too much stress on cultural than simply economic factors (which then create cultural factors). Nearly all of analysis are on the spot, so in the analysis - he's got the point.

Apart from great exaggerations on islamophopia and immigration (there is a fault of assuming latest UK immigration is islamic as it is economic from Eastern Europe). I am not an islamophobic even thou when I see places like this:



where act of barbarian demolition of buddhist sculptures (and as I now found out in this paper - probably act of great massacre of millions of Hindus in HinduKush) is to be something to be proud of... This is where multiculturalism fails - not all values are equal as being proud of slaughter and damage is not a value in western society.


What is shocking is the difference of level of analysis and the proposed vulgar and naive reactions: blackmail with civil warfare for change of cultural flow of multikulti. Reactions of someone who discovered for himself a huuuuge problem and tries to create sudden complete solution, while solution can also be in culture way only.

So - the analysis: great
Answers: wrong.

I asked of how he had been detained because he had lots of ammo left - if he waited for police looks like he made his deathcount.

Do you have this detail - was he taken by the police or was he waiting for them?

Multiculturalism is a way of dealing with cultural differences on special asssumptions taken by person or persons.
Assumptions are - all cultures can coexist mutually honoring their values and problems resolve peacefully.
Problem is that some values are contradictory.

Last edited by AndRand, Sun, 24 Jul 2011 17:08.

In Poland we had more than year ago similarly shocking incident with nearly the same deathtoll... It was catastrophy of a plane with 96 politicians of right-wing party, when pilot chose wrong altimeter on landing...even thou we had lots of jokes on the victims the very day the tragedy happened...

Therefore I fully understand how shocking it is for you and connect in deep grieve.

well... living in former-marxist state I would tell, in fact more and more they are
But we are not living in crusaders times when fighting means with fire&sword, as we say here.

Last edited by AndRand, Sat, 23 Jul 2011 21:44. Reason : @Ayn Rand - I do not refuse such notion also

Quote from deggis :

I don't think school schootings (there were two) and this case are so comparable. This guy was really organized and had planned this very accurately. Also, in his twisted mind he didn't shoot "civilians", he shot "enemies". It is more comparable to terrorism.

In fact, his twisted mind becomes interesting.
He spent 9 years to write (alone?) the 1000 pages book - elaborate on political, even more, transcentendal beliefs.
He spent as he wrote 300,000€ on this study.
And apparently on the attack, which I think the second one was a deliberate rather than as reaction to few victims at blasts.

So... back to his twisted mind - what was he trying to achieve viciously shooting 80 political teens (perceived as opponents) at 600 gathering??? Hatred? Punishment? Shattering common political correct beliefs? Do you think we can find it in "Declaration of Independence"?

Quote from U4IK ST8 :

Anyone come across this yet?

http://www.pccts.com/

if not the logos, I would say coinsidence of acronyms

Quote :

http://www.pccts.com/usa_plan_chaos_11_218_49/
I noticed PCCTS mentioned in his book and went googling.

is it superextratopsecret plan of making chaos on the planet?

After Greek economic collapse it is another bankruptcy of UE politics - this time on security.

Norway is the country of minimum extremist number. Even thou a system of close surveillance available (as every mobile mic could be the tool) and soft penalization just doesnt work and probably never will. First, you just cant control every one, or make aware that can be, leaving with minimum persecution threat. It seems that, like in UE economics (lets spend more and more taxes to save our economy) it works just the opposite.

I wonder if some things ever be revised.

Last edited by AndRand, Sat, 23 Jul 2011 19:32.

Ive never liked Jackass but I remeber Dunn for his great pranks

[']

F4 and ctrl+F4

Quote from marsaz :

Button was just keeping his line with nobody alongside. Hamilton was too optimistic and reckless. Why stick his nose in there? The only reason Button went to apologize is because they are team mates. This incident could have been avoided but I'm happy it wasn't. Why should Button let Hamilton do whatever he wants?

Because in racing you are not allowed not to.

Quote from tristancliffe :

Jenson didn't choose the middle. He was always angled towards the left as the racing line dictates. If he did make his one move, it was a minute twitch and it was before Hamilton had any overlap.

It is singleseaters. In touring cars Button would have clipped off the bumper if he didnt notice a smallest overlap

Racing rules say that you can choose your racing line once on the straight. Button chose the middle so it was his fault to change it to outer line at the end of the straight. I cant see any Hamilton's fault this time.

Quote from S14 DRIFT :

Yeahhhhhhhhhhhhh......... no, not funny. Sorry.

Not funny... but soooo true

Quote from Bawbag :

Then why is his "fake" right arm in a writing position?

Also, when I write stuff and i'm leaning my head on my hand, I generally use my right hand to lean on as i'm left handed...would be hard to do both!

Guess it was harder to make hand to lean on so when reading he is leaning on writing hand which is left not right

Quote from aroX123 :

Holy shiet, I havent noticed that

in art it is called I think color temperature balance or something like that

You could have been right tiill 3rd period.
5 golas for Finns from 1:1 to 6:1.
Gratz!

Granlund's semifinal goal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvRKs15EYqs

Frankly I dont follow NHL lately and I dont know many new players (I recognize Koivu, Ruutu - although I remember more Jarko , not playing at IIHFWC). In fact Granlund made great move from behind the goal at 15th 1st period.

Finland-Russia
1:0 ca. 6th min. 2nd period - looking forward for Granlund's scoring on youtube to paste
2:0 8th 2nd period - this match would be epic! First goal with puck delivered in high, second with 0 angle rebound.
3:0

For sure, you opt for all scandinavian final Today Swedes won Czechs - it reminds me Real-Barcelona game, with Czechs playing nice (neat and imaginative teamwork) but not succesful - the more they attacked the more counterattacks they severed.
Sweden-Czechy 5:2

Last edited by AndRand, Fri, 13 May 2011 20:05.

IIHF World Championship
1/4 finals
2nd period
Canada-Russia 1:0

1:2 final
I was waiting for penalties after two goals and 1:1 from penalty like rallies from red line.
Many guys after Stanley cup playing now in teams - Nash, Skinner, Ovechkin, Afinogenov, Kovalchuk

Last edited by AndRand, Thu, 12 May 2011 20:34. Reason : 2nd period, great game :)