Nooooo!
He doesn't want to switch the words around, just change 'not a screenshot generator' to 'and a screenshot generator', so it looks like this:"LFS is a racing simulator and a screenshot generator." Lynce wants to prove him wrong on the last bit, and does so.
2 ands, no nots!
"LFS is a racing simulator not a screenshot generator." (What Scawen said)
to
"LFS is a racing simulator and a screenshot generator." (What Lynce is making it!)
Best bedtime story I've heard in ages, keep it coming guys! :munching_
The speed seemed to be okay for the LX6 drivers...problem was there were a couple of LX4s pootling around! Nah, fair enough, it all worked out well anyway.
Mm, at least we're quite close in terms of pace...except I was a bit faster this time and we didn't see any of each other! zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Still, I had pressure - I couldn't make a mistake.
At least the cars were fun to drive. And a win is always nice, even if it is in a race of two! And it sounds quite nice to say that I finished second in an LX4 against LX6s
. Let's hope some more people turn up for next round, I'm sure they will. Cheers guys!
Oh, P.S...Notice anything odd at the start? Mabye the fact that I was last on the grid, behind the 2 safety cars?
Woops!P.P.S. What was with the lag SC? And FAIL, it went too fast agin...
Oh lol, I see! Well,
I dunno tbh. I was going to say it fell under d. but I don't think it does. It isn't a tintop (though that's probably the nearest definition), it ain't a formula car and d. doesn't work because 'open cockpit' means 'formula car' it seems.
Admins?
I dunno tbh. I was going to say it fell under d. but I don't think it does. It isn't a tintop (though that's probably the nearest definition), it ain't a formula car and d. doesn't work because 'open cockpit' means 'formula car' it seems.
Admins?Awesome. Just awesome. I was, and am, very glad to have played a part in this masterpiece! Problem is, as the filming was so long ago, I can't remember which cars I am
Filming took ages, and we had a few problems with certain people...I won't name names...but it has all been more than worth it. Brilliant job on the editing, the sound effects were great, and it was so well put together.
As for some of the suggestions, well...they're perfectly legitimate, but filming will have to be a lot more professional if there's a next time! The organisers did nothing wrong, I just can't help but feel some people had the wrong attitude in filming...refusing to do what Start etc said, playing around with start point bugs on the drag strip (okay that was funny, but it meant some shoots took 9 hours! And that meant people got bored etc, leading to more problems...:shrug Back to my point...some of these great suggestions would probably be very hard to impement, if people don't play ball!
But I don't want to sound negative, it all seems to have worked out brilliantly! There are a few inevitable flaws, fair enough with the criticism, but I feel the makers have done pretty much the best job they could - and my, is it a magnificent one! Thank you! If there's a Collateral Collision 2, and I can help in any way (acting or otherwise) I'll be glad to help!
Filming took ages, and we had a few problems with certain people...I won't name names...but it has all been more than worth it. Brilliant job on the editing, the sound effects were great, and it was so well put together.
As for some of the suggestions, well...they're perfectly legitimate, but filming will have to be a lot more professional if there's a next time! The organisers did nothing wrong, I just can't help but feel some people had the wrong attitude in filming...refusing to do what Start etc said, playing around with start point bugs on the drag strip (okay that was funny, but it meant some shoots took 9 hours! And that meant people got bored etc, leading to more problems...:shrug
Back to my point...some of these great suggestions would probably be very hard to impement, if people don't play ball! But I don't want to sound negative, it all seems to have worked out brilliantly! There are a few inevitable flaws, fair enough with the criticism, but I feel the makers have done pretty much the best job they could - and my, is it a magnificent one! Thank you!
If there's a Collateral Collision 2, and I can help in any way (acting or otherwise) I'll be glad to help!Halfway through the spare wheel.
Do you mean what should we put on them?
616
Timdpr
LFSBC
Timdpr
LFSBC
diNOSaur 
Have fun guys, wish I was coming but ah well.
He still drove it pretty fast through Paris But the sound...'enhances' it a bit.
Anyway, the sound doesn't ruin it for me either. Okay I'd probably prefer the original, but it still sounds good IMO. Mabye because I'm not concentrating on the sound, I don't really notice the faults. And besides, the point of the film is Ari driving, and where he is driving (i.e. very fast, VERY close to the edge
), not the sound.
But the sound...'enhances' it a bit.Anyway, the sound doesn't ruin it for me either. Okay I'd probably prefer the original, but it still sounds good IMO. Mabye because I'm not concentrating on the sound, I don't really notice the faults. And besides, the point of the film is Ari driving, and where he is driving (i.e. very fast, VERY close to the edge
), not the sound.Yeah, this may be a simulation, and we may want it to be as realistic as possible, but it isn't real life. Because of the races people do in LFS, and because of the mindset they approach these races with, totally random would be a little OTT. Though having said that, I wouldn't mind too much, but I'm sure a lot of people would.
+1000, I was pretty dissappointed by the movie actually. I thought 'that's not very dramatic, it doesn't look very fast, what's wrong? And why is there a co-driver? Oh crap they've paved it!'
As soon as they got to the gravel sections it looked really good. Pah! The way the movie was done was great though, and brilliant quality. But nowhere near Climb Dance, mostly because of what was being filmed.
, lighter fuel, solvents, crossbows, knives and much more...oh god, look out world!Then they have ****ed up their strategy
Chase cam ain't for driving with!
So why would you need mirrors?EDIT: Woah, he made the same thread over 2 years ago in improvement suggestions
Is Wenault! Wong spelling make me wery wery angwy!
I would say something constructive to stop this from being purely spam [EDIT: oh crap, oops], but I really don't want to get involved this silly argument. Whilst I'd prefer it if drivers didn't 'give up', in the current situation it is very sensible for any driver to do what Lewis did, and I'm sure any driver would! Why this is a reason for Hamilton-bashing I don't know, because he did what a good driver should do in that situation! As I said, it is annoying, but it isn't like Lewis is the only one who would do that.
Hell, even Gilles Villeneuve would probably have tried to save his car for the next race!
I would say something constructive to stop this from being purely spam [EDIT: oh crap, oops], but I really don't want to get involved this silly argument. Whilst I'd prefer it if drivers didn't 'give up', in the current situation it is very sensible for any driver to do what Lewis did, and I'm sure any driver would! Why this is a reason for Hamilton-bashing I don't know, because he did what a good driver should do in that situation! As I said, it is annoying, but it isn't like Lewis is the only one who would do that.
Hell, even Gilles Villeneuve would probably have tried to save his car for the next race!
http://www.worldracingforum.co ... sful-asian-f1-driver.html
Yep, I think it's Sato. 40 points from 68 starts. Satoru Nakajima had 16 points from 79 starts.
Yep, I think it's Sato. 40 points from 68 starts. Satoru Nakajima had 16 points from 79 starts.
I agree with el pibe. If you want to stop us racing in the next race of any kind if we finish 1st, 2nd or 3rd, I'm fine with that. But update the rules so that it says that!
http://z9.invisionfree.com/Man ... /index.php?showtopic=2671
http://z9.invisionfree.com/Man ... /index.php?showtopic=2671
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG