The only general lee i know is the guy nicknamed "general_lee" in the forum.


(opens wikipedia and searches)

Vray and loads of photoshop editing on my hi-res fzr model.


And another one;

Vray and loads of photoshop editing on my hi-res fzr model.

http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3163943

i'm not sure if it's mentioned in the forum before but here's the story;

BBC (via Gamasutra) reports 40 episodes of cult British car series Top Gear will be available for download through the Gran Turismo TV channel over the PlayStation Network. Additionally, Top Gear's test track will be included in GT5.
"We're sure that players will be as thrilled as we are when they get the chance to put their own driving skills to the test on the Top Gear Test Track in GT5, as well as enjoying classic episodes of Top Gear via GT TV," said Kazunori Yamauchi, Polyphony Digital president. Simon Danker, director of digital media at BBC Worldwide, added, "We're thrilled to make Top Gear accessible to Gran Turismo gamers."

Fzr spotted in traffic

Cool!

Quote from LineR32 :

Did a couple more scenes like the XRT.





BP skin was made by MickyC30

Jimi Hendrix - All Along The Watchtower

A businessman buys that painting and puts it on the table in his office to decide which wall to mount it later.And leaves it there. Then, cleaning lady arrives and she thinks that was a scratch paper so throws it to bin.

She is much more clever than him.

i studied university of fine arts so i think i might have a bit of understanding about arts...but please kick my a.s so maybe i can understand what that piece of sh...t is and why it is so priceous.

i hate those art f..kers.

Quote from RAM0011 :

Hello

SO i'm ask a question ,

LFS is a so real game , you can say that lfs better is then GT4 however

LFS is developped by 3 personnes , and GT4 by 150-200

Amazing no ? I know the technology is not same , LFS use picture technology and GT4 not but if 20-30 personne developped LFS we got the best online real car simulator ,

ty

LFS has realtime visible tyre deformations and calculations and things everything is calculated realtime.. But GT4 has many pre-calculated things like vibrations and things.(and no tyre simulations) So that makes GT4 a game, not simulator.(imho)

They are fine detailed replicas. Otherwise they would be too heavy to be mounted on there.

That's incredible.
I wish there were better pictures.

yep i know i just mean it won't lift if it doesn't move evet if the engines running full throttle or tyres spinning on 200 mph

It won't take off if it doesn't move. No movement means no help of air to lift the wings. And it is not possible to make an experiment like this because the plane will push itself by moving the air backwards, not pushing the ground backwards like cars.So the conveyor will do no effect holding the plane still... But take it on a different look, if the all runway was a conveyor the plane will take off like normal but maybe with a little bit more effort because of the extra friction of tyres.

I'm gonna be 31 in 4 months.
But doesn't matter, my cousin has been calling me "horrible" since she learned to speak when i was teenager.

Nice render, it looks real on the thumbnail.

but i didn't unserstand the issue about black patches.Why are they there? They should not be there on the original model. And what do you mean by "sharping edges"? removing polygons?

Quote from Bogey Jammer :

Renderer testing:



Blender+Indigo
The scene (unfinished) is from me, the driver comes from NFS®™©©®

There are some black patches on the body. I've already removed ones by sharping some edges, but how did the 3dsmax gurus to remove them completely? By adding some polys on "too-sharp" smooth edges?

Quote from skybotter :

my first renders ... (sorry 4 my english im spanish )

the first its modified FXR

Bye!

Nice looking headlights. Can we see a closer shot?

Quote from BigPeBe :

Yep
http://i4.photobucket.com/albu ... PeBe/Kaikkee/ohivuoto.jpg

Wow

Zip archive file is larger than the installer exe file

Quote from aoun :

Also, research and meanings are important to certain designs (to the extent where a racing site needs to look like a racing site not a barbie doll site.), but i think that looks are very important. Design is all about looks, true or false? If it looks bad, then its bad, if it looks good, then its good.. right? If that made sense, as long as it looks good, thats it.. to a certain point.




I see no blue teeth....!

Here,
"The Bluetooth wireless specification got its name from Harald Blaatand (translates to "Bluetooth"), a 10th-century Danish king who used diplomacy to negotiate a truce between two feuding factions. In fact, the Bluetooth logo is an overlay of the Danish characters for the king's initials: H.B."

See what i mean? A well prepared logo should have a meaning or a story hidden in it. Othervise, it will be just an image which everyone will say something about it and decided just by looking at it's colours and font look good or not.

Of course it is just my opinion and sadly i know only very few people agree including some pro designers...

Quote from rcpilot :

Hate to break it to you, but 'kids' decide who win and lose in the real world. You tend not to work for experts, you work for people who want your expertise.

No i don't agree. In the real world, you work for idiots (who think they are the only experts and only they can choose the correct one) which you can easily con to make them like your design. But kids are not like that. Different.

Quote from rjm1982 :

ZORER... design student?

You sound more like a design student than a designer...rattling off theory but failing to put it into practice.

failing to put it into practice?
that's a matter of time. even if i had enough time i'd not spend more than 10 minutes into a contest which "kids" will decide who wins and who loses. i did my tries, spent some more time to tell my thoughts and hope someone really do something.I know one or two of them are not bad designs but most keep doing the same things. Still that infinite icon is the most popular thing on most of the logos...which is really bad imo.

So i see you guys all love glossy effects, unreadable fonts, and icons which don't mean anything. Nobody is trying to do about the concept "endurance". When you see contrast colors or glossy-shiny images with shadow effects and things you love them. But you forget that's not making logos.Even if you don't use something conceptual just at least please use readable fonts. And the logos all you do are in pixel formats...none of those logos would be cut out from folios which is not a good thing if made for real-life companies...

A logotype is not just an image which looks nice.It must mean something.(i'm talking bout good ones) It must tell something even if you don't read it.plus, it must be readable and clean and neat as well. And by the way, if you choose a font it must be a reason why to chose it. It shouldn't be selected just because it looks weird and sci-fi or unreadable. Most of the professional fonts have their own stories. None of the good designers select their font by just looking at if it looks nice.They should make research about them...

please keep these in mind when trying to make logos.

Here's another one, in case admins wish to stick with the infinity thingy.

Quote from aoun :

I get ya . Not bad.

Second design looks better, the yellow circle doesnt look nice.

Thanks.

I agree yellow circle sucks.