#03 F1RST Racing GT1
FZ50 GTR
Rocabiliz, André Roque, Portugal
Chriskart, Christian Krognes, Norway
RamboJorGen, Jesse Nieminen, Finland
Vince, Vincent Staal, The Netherlands
Rudy van Buren, Rudy van Buren, The Netherlands
#35 F1RST Racing GT2
FZ50 GTR
M4ver1ck, Patrick Kubinji, Germany
Darkone55, Bas Bouma, The Netherlands
Thommm, Thomas Arends, The Netherlands
Priitmek, Priit Mäekivi, Estonia
FZ50 GTR
Rocabiliz, André Roque, Portugal
Chriskart, Christian Krognes, Norway
RamboJorGen, Jesse Nieminen, Finland
Vince, Vincent Staal, The Netherlands
Rudy van Buren, Rudy van Buren, The Netherlands
#35 F1RST Racing GT2
FZ50 GTR
M4ver1ck, Patrick Kubinji, Germany
Darkone55, Bas Bouma, The Netherlands
Thommm, Thomas Arends, The Netherlands
Priitmek, Priit Mäekivi, Estonia
Last edited by traxxion, .
Reason : Protugal!
Or maybe it's the other way round...
That's what Flame is on about I think... so I think we all mean the same thing: it would be nice to have the LFS license name because it is unique.LFS In-game playername would be a nice addition because most of the times these are better formatted and therefore look nicer in results tables.
PS I agree with the suggestion of BBO: teams would be nice too!
Congrats Kristjan, Kevin and CoRe EU! 
None of them really plays my taste of dance music either, but talentless...?
Yeah, license name would be nice.. and fastest lap?
Alonso and Vettel 
(so hopefully similar to the Ferrari lineup in two years time)
(so hopefully similar to the Ferrari lineup in two years time)
Last edited by traxxion, .
If I look at other posts from you here, there is no way you couldn't have seen at least one of the numerous typos in your thread title. If you're too lazy to fail-check a thread title, I'm too lazy to help.. it's funny how some people think everyone will just jump all the hurdles of spelling and grammar mistakes and still have enough breath to post a helpful reply before the finish.
Very entertaining race, fun to watch! And nice driving too!
Ah, I thought that, but this rule makes me think it that only applies to protests. Maybe a clarification of the fact that it's for penalties in general would be in place?
Good updates. One question:
How do we go about when a penalty is incurred with less than 10 minutes to go in the race?
How do we go about when a penalty is incurred with less than 10 minutes to go in the race?
Im aslo bieng lef in teh dust as to waht yuo maen with tihs thraet tilte.
Gees that scared the hell out of me!
You can only change the button colors: Options -> Display -> Interface (bottom right).
Sent. Apologies for misinterpreting the discussion "request".
Dear admins,
We understand the complexity of this issue and therefore want to thank you very much for making a swift decision on this matter. We appreciate that a new rule is proposed to avoid uncertainties in similar situations in the future. We can also understand you wish to treat the server crash as a SC period and following the list of beneficial aspects we certainly agree it is the perfect solution to use for the rest of the season.
We disagree, however, on the fact that this rule is applied with retroactive effect. One of the main reasons being that, during the race, drivers and teams were in the understanding that the results of the first part of the race would be taken into account in the final results. This has lead (and apparently now mislead) to strategical choices that are obviously irreversible now.
Secondly, in our opinion the second part of the race would have had to be restarted under SC conditions in order to make the application of this rule legitimate. Therefore - with reference to your aim for a better simulation of real life endurance racing by using the ALMS/ACO rule set, and taking our arguments into account - we would like to hear your reason for not applying the following rule from that rule set:
We sincerely hope for you to take these points into account and reconsider the decision. Once again, we're very much for the rule change, but we certainly feel that applying the change on a finished race is unfair for everyone involved.
Thank you very much for a reply, on behalf of F1RST Racing GT2,
R. van der Kooij
We understand the complexity of this issue and therefore want to thank you very much for making a swift decision on this matter. We appreciate that a new rule is proposed to avoid uncertainties in similar situations in the future. We can also understand you wish to treat the server crash as a SC period and following the list of beneficial aspects we certainly agree it is the perfect solution to use for the rest of the season.
We disagree, however, on the fact that this rule is applied with retroactive effect. One of the main reasons being that, during the race, drivers and teams were in the understanding that the results of the first part of the race would be taken into account in the final results. This has lead (and apparently now mislead) to strategical choices that are obviously irreversible now.
Secondly, in our opinion the second part of the race would have had to be restarted under SC conditions in order to make the application of this rule legitimate. Therefore - with reference to your aim for a better simulation of real life endurance racing by using the ALMS/ACO rule set, and taking our arguments into account - we would like to hear your reason for not applying the following rule from that rule set:
We sincerely hope for you to take these points into account and reconsider the decision. Once again, we're very much for the rule change, but we certainly feel that applying the change on a finished race is unfair for everyone involved.
Thank you very much for a reply, on behalf of F1RST Racing GT2,
R. van der Kooij
Aww sad to hear the rest of the race got lost! But thanks for the link!
Ah, didn't know it wasn't official yet! Congrats both!
Congrats both!Will the stream be available for downloading later?
#03 F1RST Racing GT1
#35 F1RST Racing GT2
Skins by Teemu 'TeazR' Vedenoja
Renders by Matias 'mogster' Riekkola
#35 F1RST Racing GT2
Skins by Teemu 'TeazR' Vedenoja
Renders by Matias 'mogster' Riekkola
#03 F1RST Racing GT1
FZ50 GTR
Rocabiliz, André Roque, Protugal
lastpunisher, Hendrik Piiriste, Estonia
RamboJorGen, Jesse Nieminen, Finland
Vince, Vincent Staal, The Netherlands
#35 F1RST Racing GT2
FZ50 GTR
M4ver1ck, Patrick Kubinji, Germany
Darkone55, Bas Bouma, The Netherlands
Thommm, Thomas Arends, The Netherlands
Rudy van Buren, Rudy van Buren, The Netherlands
FZ50 GTR
Rocabiliz, André Roque, Protugal
lastpunisher, Hendrik Piiriste, Estonia
RamboJorGen, Jesse Nieminen, Finland
Vince, Vincent Staal, The Netherlands
#35 F1RST Racing GT2
FZ50 GTR
M4ver1ck, Patrick Kubinji, Germany
Darkone55, Bas Bouma, The Netherlands
Thommm, Thomas Arends, The Netherlands
Rudy van Buren, Rudy van Buren, The Netherlands
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG