hahhahahhaha, love u! that's almost exactly what i would've said (bit more sarcasm and abuse though)
wau, and so modest. congrats on having WRs on some of the most popular combos out there! WE1R with RB4 is a real nailbitter.
Last edited by scipy, .
There is no scenario in the world where reporting about a LFS movie where a rocket launching facility is on the South City circut takes PRIORITY over reporting about something like mmmmm, A RACE, cause it's a RACING SIMULATOR. I sound like a bastard, not like an idiot - there's a difference.
P.S. I dont have anything against SRT, I'm sure their reporting about leagues and races they participate in and know inside and out is more than satisfying to people in those leagues. LFS never quite got there, something that you could've changed. I will stop feeding the troll now, last post.
lol. I know, but it was _HE_ that decided to go into reporting and by that he is making his work _PUBLIC_ and bad comments (even evil ones like mine) are not only possible, but should be expected. I could have said "hi, good job! although, can u report about some race event next time? tnx in advance and keep up the good work!!", but the shear fact that he thought representing the "LFS comunity" by what he did, shows how far out of touch with reality he really is - so why not get a rise out of the tard with a good dose of sarcasm. If something is worth doing, it's worth doing right. I do not care enough to be the one to do it, but I do care enough to tell someone who's doing it wrong that it's complete shit.
hahahahhahahaahahahahahaha
good one. I am not an attention whore though, if I was, I would prolly care a lot more what people thought of me and would act like so many of the "yes men" which just go with "great job!" posts around the forum, hoping, just hoping for your aproval.P.S. I wasn't the one that needed to feel so special and make myself feel good that I went and bought another S2 license and tried to con my way into a top team.
Last edited by scipy, .
Can't believe I did it again, I clicked and watched, knowing fullwell what is bound to happen. This time I thought "it might be different, a LFS guy doing the report", but no. You failed more miserably than SRT guys ever did, at least they reported something about the actual races in LFS, and what did you do.. report about a in game setup app (which is ok and usefull) and then about a LFS movie? A LFS MOVIE?! Just a great job. VERY informative. Let's cover cruising in the next report, in detail, IN DETAIL please.
Hai Ben,
First thing I've checked was FZR and there's a miss-match, position of CoG was moved 1.5 % forward in Z patch and is 37.5 %, but in VHPA it's 36.65 %.
First thing I've checked was FZR and there's a miss-match, position of CoG was moved 1.5 % forward in Z patch and is 37.5 %, but in VHPA it's 36.65 %.
I wouldn't have posted it if it wasnt considerably faster.
Aston GP/GT/North and the reverse combinations.
The track is the best in LFS cause it's a fast and "flowing" track with only 1 really slow corner, making the chicane "slower" is opposite of what the track is about and would feel out of place. I'm all for changing it, just not making it slower. Remove the speedbumps on the left side and extend the wall a bit and put something solid on the right side (keeping the corner radii as they are now).
Do u happen to know the key for their IRC channel? Cause last time i had a problem i just contacted the admin there and everything was solved.. but not the channel is protected
Wierd request: HDBits.org invite?
I don't know if torrent sites are a taboo on lfs forums but anyway.. I had an account on hdbits.org and during my period of a month without internet it got deactivated because I forgot to "park" it. If anyone has an invite for hdbits.org I will literally do whatever they want (within reason). Pretty pretty pretty please with a cherry on top. 
I see the laps are back on, one thing though, can you put back the feature that displays a driver name before his laps start? This is ok too but I had to guess the laps from the graph when the takeover happened (that lap times stands out ofcourse but still was a bit of a hastle to do it for multiple teams). So if it can be like it used to:
Driver name
1. laptime
2. laptime
3. laptime
etc etc, if not.. I guess it's fine this way too.
P.S. It doesnt have to be driver name, if you can colour-code the takeover lap or something that can be helpfull too, just something to make it really noticable.
Driver name
1. laptime
2. laptime
3. laptime
etc etc, if not.. I guess it's fine this way too.
P.S. It doesnt have to be driver name, if you can colour-code the takeover lap or something that can be helpfull too, just something to make it really noticable.
As metalhead wrote, they are very relevant to some people
Especially ones running in endurance leagues, I also have a proggy that requires a list of lap times to be paste in the form like they were on LFSW and then it returns the avg lap (ignores laps that are X % larger than fastest lap), for example: 1. 2:19.590 - Lap time is more than 103.00 percent of the fastest lap
2. 2:13.110
3. 2:11.970
4. 2:12.170
5. 2:12.540
6. 2:11.990
7. 2:13.240
8. 2:12.050
9. 2:11.240
10. 2:10.940
11. 2:11.180
12. 2:11.060
13. 2:10.790
14. 2:10.600
15. 2:10.970
16. 2:11.990
17. 2:10.570
18. 2:10.290
19. 2:09.810
20. 2:09.800
21. 2:09.940
22. 2:09.960
23. 2:18.710 - Lap time is more than 103.00 percent of the fastest lap
24. 2:10.700
25. 2:10.680
26. 2:24.090 - Lap time is more than 103.00 percent of the fastest lap
27. 5:23.770 - Lap time is more than 103.00 percent of the fastest lap
Average lap time (without those which are bigger than 103.00 percent): 2:11.199
Total race time: 62:43.750
Or can we at least get some more screenshots? Other sides of the car, maybe interior view? Pwetty pwease?
Well the way in which it works now has no advantage over the previous version which had no "play" feature. IMO, if you can see the lines being drawn as the replay is played it will "accentuate" the differences more than if you just look at the 2 lines that are already there.
More tire changing option in F12 (or garage)
I really try not to post everything that comes into mind because I hope everything is already on a list that's located somewhere on Scawen's desktop.. but this would be a very small update which would make BF1 racing (well any car tbh) much much easier.
Since rules don't force us to change tire compounds during the race (mainly because R2's are undrivable and R4's are ice cubes) we can do pretty much 220 % fuel on 1 set of R3 tires. Problems arise when you pit for a splash-and-dash with tire change set to if wear > 90 % and it changes only 1 tire for example. If there is an "always" option in the tire change menu, can we please have the "never" option aswell?
Another thing (but maybe not as important) would be the following 2 options: change only fronts & change only rears. But if we can have the "never" option for now, I'd be overjoyed.
Since rules don't force us to change tire compounds during the race (mainly because R2's are undrivable and R4's are ice cubes) we can do pretty much 220 % fuel on 1 set of R3 tires. Problems arise when you pit for a splash-and-dash with tire change set to if wear > 90 % and it changes only 1 tire for example. If there is an "always" option in the tire change menu, can we please have the "never" option aswell?
Another thing (but maybe not as important) would be the following 2 options: change only fronts & change only rears. But if we can have the "never" option for now, I'd be overjoyed.
Is there any way to make the graph fields "blank" as the replay is about to start, and then as the vertical line moves to the right it "draws" a graph as it goes?
YAY! me so happy
P.S. Schnuffel is 4eva.
P.S. Schnuffel is 4eva.
no.This one is called: Darkone begs for pat on the shoulder.
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG