The online racing simulator
Searching in All forums
(998 results)
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
The first line got me excited "Imagine you are the engineer of your own racing destiny during the birth of modern racing" sounded like you would design and build your own car to compete with. Nuts.

Still, I love that era (not really for Indy, but racing in general)
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
She certainly is eye-catching!
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
Does it support custom coding? (PHP, CSS, etc) and database type of stuff? The gallery I want to use has a bunch of scripting in it, and it's not something any of those plug-n-play type services have by default (all of the gallery things on those tend to look crap).

In any case, my site is closer to completion so I might just stick with that route for now.
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
Very nice. I'm still in the process of getting a new site together (god I desperately need to replace the poor crap quickly thrown together thing I've got up there now...) myself. It's a slow process, though, as I don't have any spare time to try to learn the coding myself, and my buddy that has been doing it has recently gotten a new job which nets him 70+ hours a week...

I still don't even have my portfolio pieces picked out... or any descriptions done...

Actually, that reminds me, I need to renew my host, as well... I need more money.
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
Quote from The Very End :Indeed Maggot! I am not into skating myself, but from a spectators point of veiw I find it both entertaining and usefull. The kids really love it, and there are several benefits from it, such as:
  • Helping the kids socialize - getting them off the computer and into groups of other young people
  • A lot of health benefits (only minuses here are the injuries, but that's something we just got to accept, kids fall and hurt themself but are soon on their legs again!)
  • It seems that the two points above really helps the kids not getting into the "trouble-zone". By this I mean that the kids skating is not the kids who vandalize and do shit in the neightbourhood. If this is just randomly luck I do not know, but it seems it helps the kids to get healthy interests and moral
I did not know that the skating community had such great veiws on green movement, but nevertheless it's great hearing that! We need more people like that in today's world!

Many companies have excessive product lines that use environmentally friendly process, practices and/or materials. Some companies also absorb the added cost instead of charging more for their 'green' products. Some companies, like Sector 9, go so far as to advocate it directly on their site and through their sponsored events. In no other industry have I seen a proper, dedicated example of reducing the environmental impact on a fundamental behavior level. Lots of companies do the 'LOOK AT ME! I'm going GREEN!' thing for publicity's sake, but the action sports (especially skateboard and snowboard) markets do it because it's right; proven by the way they've handled it.

A lot of that might come down to the fact that these industries depend on a good environment to even exist as sports at all, but the proof is in the pudding, so to speak.
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
Quote from Taavi(EST) :

September is coming....

Jesus-Tap-Dancing-Christ! I want this.
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
You got it, buddy. Skating has become a really important culture (at least in North America, anyways). I'm finding most skate companies, particularly the Californian based ones, are really at the leading edge of the green movement (I mean the real, actual environmental and sustainability stuff, not the fluffy marijuana and flowers bullshit). The days of the 'skate punk' problems are long gone. At least in NA, anyways. Can't attest to the rest of the world.

Keeping kids skating is good my business, too. We design a LOT of action sports equipment
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
Very nice!
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
Quote from Rappa Z :What I found especially interesting was the Palatov DP4PPS. For those of you who don't know, the man who built the car use to frequent these forums quite a bit and for a while it appeared his car could end up in LFS. While that didn't happen, it's awesome to see his project place 5th, only 18 seconds off of first place, in their first try.

Same, quite impressed. It's a shame his machine never made it into LFS, I would have loved to give it a go!
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
Quote from Postman Pat :Out of interest, why would you want to see 2 wheels and someone else's arms? Feels like I'm not really driving.

It makes a difference to frame rate in iRacing. Pretty sure in everything else too.

Seeing a dashboard alone is weird to me; unless my wheel were positioned to be in the spot of the wheel. It makes the cockpit look awkward, and wrong.

Similarily, a moving steeringwheel without arms looks wrong, too, and makes me feel disconnected, like in rF1.
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
I doubt the virtual wheel has much impact on FPS, but it is nice to disable it for those who choose to. Personally, I find it weird to NOT have the wheel and arms on the screen, UNLESS your actual wheel perfectly covers it in your view.
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
Sweet! Is that the first victory for one of your schemes?
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
Quote from Taavi(EST) :Well...
No more info on VLN yet. They didn't want pictures taken of it, probably still way too WIP to show anything. Or maybe they had it converted from nkpro just for testing purposes. Then again...they have it licensed (logo on the track menu indicates license) Non licensed tracks like Mugello aka Scaperia on their track list have no official logo on them.

OH HELL YES! :hyper:
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
Who says old Monza and the Sudschleife? If you're just basing it on those track maps in the picture I'd say don't get too excited, that could be misleading.

If they are indeed included, though, I'm buying it for sure. Absolutely.
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
Quote from JJ72 :you got pics!!

Excellent!
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
Quote from dadge :Feckin Emos...

Oi!

(hard rock ftw!)
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
My favorite era in Motorsport history. I'll definitely give this one a watch when I get a chance!

[EDIT] Just had a watch. Nice video! Some of the interviews were a little hard to hear, though. Probably partly due to the original recording quality and partly to my crap ears. I think you left out a lot of F1 drivers in the ending sequence, too, like Schlesser, Von Traps, etc.
Last edited by MAGGOT, .
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
Quote from dadge :to reet the balance, thanks for Deadmau5.

You can keep him (I don't like electronic music. Or clubs )
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
Quote from lukelfs :TDU2 is terrible, get TDU1 and the expansion pack - then unlock Hardcore mode, sooo much fun to drive the cars - you can even download some community made cars.

TDU1 was just an unplayable to me; the low-detail roads made it quite crap to drive anywhere but in the cities.
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
Quote from Crashgate3 :Human Centipede on Ice

Someone's gunna lose their job on that one. bahaha
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
Saw a tech demo trailer this morning, blew me away. It's actually getting me to pick up the first two games to see what the series is all about. It looks like it may be worth the money for the eye candy alone.
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
Quote from Jakg :F1 cars have got ~900-1000 HP from a 1.5 turbo engine, however reliability is always a concern (i.e. they would last a single race). Production wise, all I can think of was the FQ4000 - but this *had* to be run on 99RON fuel and had a service interval every 7,500 miles.

However, with big enough turbos it's possible to get pretty much any power from any engine (reliability aside).

Yes, but plausibility for a street-going car? Reliability is more important for high performance cars now than it used to be. This is intended to be a road-going vehicle, not just a track car. I just want to be sure that the spec is within the realms of the plausible before I go spouting it
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
Quote from Hyperactive :Tbh it sounds like want to decide the type of engine based on style instead of engineering criteria. Form over function so to speak.

Of course the biggest thing you need to remember is where the engine comes and does it matter. Flat 6 litre v16 engine sounds totally awesome concept for example but to get one you need to make your own. Same with flat 8 cyl engine. Hard to get one of those anywhere. If you are prepared to accept more conventional solutions you can always pick a v8 with the specs you want from some engine builder or manufacturer. Add couple turbos on it and call it maggot speziale.

But of course if the engine itself needs to be the differentiating factor inside the car that produces the wow factor then a v8 is probably not what you want. I don't think are any major engineering restrictions to get desired amount of hp from any engine configuration. I think your only limitations are on the production side.

In a matter of speaking, yes; I want to opt for a 3 litre so the name that I like makes sense. The source of the engine doesn't matter; as this is purely specs in a digital concept. I just want those specs to be believable. No real engineering going to be happening here. I'd opted for a flat configuration for the beneficial lower centre of gravity, smooth running and because it's uncommon; the only real significant automotive Flat-8 is from the 908, and flat configurations in general are not that widespread. It's something different, which is why it's been chosen.

The practicalities are not too too important since this is just specs and a roughed in visual to accompany it. So long as the numbers make sense that's all I need.

Quote :Flattening the exhaust pipes will just make them heavier because you want certain cross-section area and for elliptic shaped exhausts you need more steel. Basically if you flatten a circle the area inside the ellipse is smaller than the circle so you need bigger circle to begin with. Of course flattening the exhausts creates problems elsewhere as well. Routing them through the car can be a bit troublesome because their dimensions change depending what direction you turn them.

Thanks for the explanation. I'll stick with the cylindrical pipes, then, on account of weight-savings (again, not a big impact, as you might not see them at all anyways, we'll see how in depth I go with detail in the engine bay. I might only do the top of the engine in detail as that's all you'll see).

Quote from robt :So a 3 litre twin turbo with technology 20 odd years newer should have no problem

Perfect.

Thanks, guys!
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
Quote from The Very End :Damn, what you gotta do to get 17+ then?! O_o

The announcers said that he was a wee bit sloppy in a couple spots.

Apparently.
MAGGOT
S2 licensed
Quote from breadfan :Yes. If I had that kind of money, I wouldn't go below 5 litres and a V8. I like big burbling engines. The high-revving screamers don't do much to me. Not saying they are worse, it's just a matter of taste and I like big engines. Macho bullshit.

I'm a fan of the burbly ones too, but I'm trying keep the environmental/fuel economy side in mind without going with electric technologies. (I know I know, it's a supercar, that's not important, blah blah blah ) The main reason is I like the name "30-8" for the car, and I want to have the numbers mean something. "50-8" just doesn't have the same ring to it.

Quote from aoun :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porsche_908

The 908 used a Flat-8 engine at the time...naturally aspirated @ 350HP. Im sure a twin turbo setup can increase the power far more than that.

Not sure if it matters, but locally theres V8 TT engines around here 600HP+

Any idea on the displacement of those V8s? The engine in the 908 is the only significant automotive reference to a flat-8 I've been able to find.


Next stupid question: Do exhaust pipes need to be circular in cross-section for any specific reasons? (Handling of pressure, etc) Are there any adverse affects of flattening the pipes out at all?

I'm not a complete numpty, I've just never really looked into this stuff before.
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG