Assuming you're not running a headless server, and you're using a distro which has this level of integration, then yes. I can't think of any hosting/server rental companies that would provide a linux or any unix-like server in that state though.
Pretty much in my experience. The idea seems to be with beefy chocolate like that, is that it's eaten in really small amounts, over a long period of time. If I have any it's usually with a ridiculously strong and large amount of coffee tbh.
royk1991, I can safely assume you're at least 16, maybe 17 from your username, but your posting indicates that you're much younger.
If you're going to make a request you need to be much more specific
This is extremely vague, and as far as I'm concerned a pointless request. You need to have a proper specification of what you want, and how you want it to work. A single paragraph is not enough, let alone a sentence. You really need to think about what you want and how you want it to work, down to the smallest detail. What command do you want people to use? Do you want a button interface? What is the goal of the modification? etc. etc. These aren't in any specific order.
You also need to be aware of just how much work you're asking someone to do, for someone who clearly doesn't know what they want - a detailed spec would indicate otherwise. Based on that fact do you really think you're going to get what you're asked for? Off the top of my head I can't think of anyone who posts in this part of the forum would help you based on your posts so far.
Yes. Traditional programs (i.e. non-forking (I've used the term forking quite liberally here, assume it means anything from an actual fork to a wrapper program)), such as LFS, do not return until they have finished executing. Since batch files work sequentially you cannot run a traditional program without using the start command.
You wrote this thread yesterday. Do not bump it in such a sort space of time. If someone has time to do what you want they will see your request. Feel free to bump after a week or month.
If you call anyone a ****, and it isn't me - I'd say those are pretty good grounds (if I was aimed at me, I'd laugh).
You're asking what is a pretty open ended question at the end of the day. We're pretty lenient here, and let a lot of things slide that other places wouldn't - because of this if you're looking for a list it isn't gonna appear. The general rules (treat others as you expect to be treated, etc. etc.) are spelt out in the agreement, but it's pretty flexible.
I will point out that more people get banned for posting cracked content then bad behaviour though.
If you've truly made a cock up, write to the developers directly (using the link below) and they may provide you with an additional unlock before Friday.
My suggestion would be to use VirtualBox, Microsoft Virtual Server, VMWare or whatever on your desktop/development machine and setup a low power linux server to test it first
What does it matter? Version numbers are irrelvant. They are a method of naming for the developers and very little else.
Whats wrong with the next version being called "Dads Army VI"? Nothing. It's just a way of determining a version. It doesn't mean anything in particular therefore since it has no significance its irrelevant.
Well you've not said what architecture you're using, nor what distro.
I've not packaged anyway, but quite frankly all you do is make sure you've not got any of the X.org development libraries (which you'd have to explicitly say you want to install in most distros) download and extract the latest version of Wine, then configure, make, make install (you need the relevant build tools to do this, under anuy debian derivative just apt-get install build-essentials as root (either by su, authenticating and installing, then dropping out of root, or via using sudo):
wget http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/wine-1.1.1.tar.bz2 tar xf wine-1.1.1.tar.bz2 cd wine-1.1.1 ./configure make depend make <switch to root, or run the next command via sudo> make install
Now just run LFS (I'd suggest running it in screen, or under nohup):
wine LFS.exe /cfg=path/to/setup.cfg
It'll complain, but it should run fine provided that dedicated=invisible in the cfg. Any problems with the cfg and it'll just crash out. Obviously you'd need to make the relevant alterations to your firewall and stuff.
It's entirely possible to do, although is going to require a significant amount of work to acheive.
Are you looking for someone to do the bulk of the programming work, or were you hoping for advice of how to acheive it yourself? (I can't be bothered to write a huge response if you're looking for someone - I'll just move it to the requests forum if that's the case).
I'd be willing to put money on the fact that it's fine 100% of the time for everyone outside of your network. There's absolutely no requirement to use the in-game list when you're hosting and connecting to the server, on the same LAN.
1. You should've gotten in touch directly with the developers (http://www.lfs.net/?page=mailus) or BMTmicro (which is more applicable in this instance) - the community cannot answer your question.
2. It actually says "Your payment was declined. Please contact your bank for more information.". I think that says it all really.