1 - There is no problems
2 - I guess it's popcorn time.
2 - I guess it's popcorn time.
Last edited by nacim, .
Reason : Grammar
And that's definitely something that I want to see.
I agree that a rev limiter can be a nice addition (not a high priority tho), because hard locking to the red line is really unrealistic.
Thanks for the progress report ! Keep it up !
This made me laugh way more than I should.
This made me laugh way more than I should.
Bro, what the f*ck ? It's not about AC, it's just an example to explain that having a better team to have more content (and why not real content) and better graphics can be a really good addition to the game we all love.
Yes.
Too easy, heard it a bit too much. Maybe it's true, but if you have cracked the game, even if it's because you don't have money, you are absolutely not in right to ask for content for stuff that you cracked. Play your cracked and VOB modded game if you want, but don't come to the forums to express it. Thanks.
But LFS team can do much better than AC team if they where the same number, and LFS has a very nice netcode, it not AC at all. ^^
Integration means programming, adding IA paths, configurations, track in the track menu, compute path selection, etc. and I think this is on Scawen's scope.
I can't agree more with you.
This. I'm a game developer, and I totally agree with that, but there is a limit for it too. LFS needs more artists, but not too much, because Scawen need to integrate their work, and it takes time. And don't forget that right now, Scawen is working on several things just so Eric can work on higher quality tracks, so imagine if there is 3 artists on the team.
'TL;DR : For me, LFS needs more artists, but not sure if Scawen can handle intergration + improvement on the game + new/improved tools for artists.
@Scawen : What do you think about it ? I need your answer (and I know you are following the thread, as usual
).That's the first thing I said when I connected to this server. Good to know that I'm not mad.
Love it, it gave me my dose of speed for today, same for me, impossible to go further than 349/348 km/h with BF1, you should try to inclinate turns for v3, so we have faster corner exits. 
Some files are corrupted, reinstall the game.
@Scawen : As requested, here is my suggestion.
So, let's say LFS need to use the texture BWnewroad.dds to use it with new shaders for tracks. My idea is to make LFS search for BWnewroadNORM.dds and BWnewroadSPEC.dds, and load them it they exist. Then, it will just pass thoses textures to the shader (just like any texture), so we can add normal maps and specular maps to LFS.
Why doing this only if thoses textures exists ? To keep usage of texture which don't have thoses, and make cool shaders only for roads, wall and grass.
These, are easy and fast techniques to add graphical detail in game, at no (or nearly no) performance cost.
Normal map :
Specular map (on the right, note how the wood is not shiny everywhere) :
NOTE: normal mapping needs to have tangents and binormals for each vertex in order to be implemented (AFAIK).
Why doing this only if thoses textures exists ? To keep usage of texture which don't have thoses, and make cool shaders only for roads, wall and grass.
These, are easy and fast techniques to add graphical detail in game, at no (or nearly no) performance cost.
Normal map :
Specular map (on the right, note how the wood is not shiny everywhere) :
NOTE: normal mapping needs to have tangents and binormals for each vertex in order to be implemented (AFAIK).
Done, here is mine :
NOTE: When LFS is minimised, I have 25% GPU usage while it's at 0% when LFS is in fullscreen.
NOTE: When LFS is minimised, I have 25% GPU usage while it's at 0% when LFS is in fullscreen.
Hi Lynce,
Actually, I don't really like choses concepts for a website, it makes me think of the old one, which was not practical at all. And maybe some flat design will give it a more recent touch. I'll try to go a quick mockup for a website tomorrow to give you my idea of it.
Actually, I don't really like choses concepts for a website, it makes me think of the old one, which was not practical at all. And maybe some flat design will give it a more recent touch. I'll try to go a quick mockup for a website tomorrow to give you my idea of it.
Actually Haswell's IGP is close to a GTX 750 and I can actually play LFS on my laptop with my HD5000 @ 1366x768 with constant 60 FPS with some cars and Westhill.
How can I defend Intel with recent Skylake announcement ?
IGP are nice for very light gaming (or LFS, which is really not using GPU), but it dosen't match a mid-end graphics end ATM.
Have you heard about Broadwell desktop CPUs ?
Hey bro !
I think your updater is a bit broken, it tries to display HTML and there is this white background that ruins it, check screenshot. ^^
I think your updater is a bit broken, it tries to display HTML and there is this white background that ruins it, check screenshot. ^^
Weird, three solutions : wait for an update to the update software, do a clean install, do your researches on the error code.
Install it with this tool : https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/software-download/windows10
Shadow mapping ? Realtime reflections ? PCSS ? Motion blur ? Scawen, please tell me that your to-do list is full of good things like that (yep, I'm definitly crazy).
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG