3D LFS renders
(8476 posts, started )
Hey Ric, first off all, you have all the reasons to think this have more polys then the original, and it does!! Thats because of the MeshSmooth . But maybe i can explain what i mean with 1/3 of the polys .

LFS cars usualy are made with triangular polys, and im used to work 4 side polys ( i think the word is trapezoids, not sure :P ).

Now, If you cut a diagonal in a square, you get 2 identic triangles. And thats how the polys where originaly done. All i did was replace 2 triangles for a square, only in the plarts that really mattered , wich turned out to be more then i expected :P . Anyways, you get the picture now, replace 2 polys for 1

I ended up with the exactly the same model as the original, but with about 1/3 of the polys less. After that comes the MeshSmooth, with only 1 iteration, but doubles all the polys in the car

Anyways, heres some pics in the 3dsmax. Im still working on it
Attached images
Quote from JBiturbo :All i did was replace 2 triangles for a square

Hmmm if you convert 2 triangles to a quad you still have 4 polys. (you have one face instead of 2 and 4 edges instead of 5 but you still have the same poly amount or have I missed something?)
Attached images
Quote from John5200 :Hmmm if you convert 2 triangles to a quad you still have 4 polys. (you have one face instead of 2 and 4 edges instead of 5 but you still have the same poly amount or have I missed something?)

those are vertexes, not poly.
Quote from JJ72 :those are vertexes, not poly.

damn I always mix them up:doh:
John5200 , you confused things there . With 2 triangles attached you have 4 vertex's, 5 edges, 2 faces and 2 poly's . With 1 square you have 4 vertex's , 4 edges , 2 faces and 1 poly.
Damn, that rb4 looks so amazing ;( i wish i could make something like that but i dont undarstand almost anything in 3ds max :/
some stuff
Attached images
That's so sexy, 'specially the first one.
Nice renders there phil! Really like this XRT.
pic xrt tuning by henrique
Attached images
Juliao, have you asked him to post his render here?
@e2mustang, leonardo555:
yeah, originally the rbr is a little too low-poly, but there is nothing in the 3d-world that couldn´t be fixed. (see screens...)

@JBiturbo:
First:
polys with 3 vertices --> tris or triangles (clever, huh? oO)
polys with 4 vertices --> quads
I´m kinda sry to have to tell you, that you actually don´t change the polycount by deleting the senseless edges in the middle of your quads. Intern (of any 3d-software), all the faces will still keep divided into triangles... . (according to the sheme shown in the following picture: http://www.ericchadwick.com/po ... ples/tri_quad_hexagon.gif )
Second:
Meshsmooth is kinda "cheating", as you get into the habits of high-poly-modelling, and this aint good, trust me.

@itsphilthy:
nice ones, like the scenes.

@juliao:
nice scene.

@all:
thx, just found some motivation and time to move one with my little sunshine.

ric
Attached images
Quote from bright devil :@e2mustang, leonardo555:
yeah, originally the rbr is a little too low-poly, but there is nothing in the 3d-world that couldn´t be fixed. (see screens...)

thats right,only if u have the time in the world. not when you work 12-13h/day, 6 days a week i wish i could do more stuff. nice model u got there btw
Quote from beefyman666 :Been playing around with 3DSmax and came up with a little something, nothing special as I'm really crap at all this modelling stuff.

Only been merging parts from other scenes and pulling bits about.

As you can probably tell, it's a twin MRT engined UF1.

Thanks to LineR32 for the help.

Hmm Have u got that texture with no windows for XRT
And if its posible Can u make it =) XRT Car with no windows all clear =)
Quote from bright devil :@e2mustang, leonardo555:
yeah, originally the rbr is a little too low-poly, but there is nothing in the 3d-world that couldn´t be fixed. (see screens...)

@JBiturbo:
First:
polys with 3 vertices --> tris or triangles (clever, huh? oO)
polys with 4 vertices --> quads
I´m kinda sry to have to tell you, that you actually don´t change the polycount by deleting the senseless edges in the middle of your quads. Intern (of any 3d-software), all the faces will still keep divided into triangles... . (according to the sheme shown in the following picture: http://www.ericchadwick.com/po ... ples/tri_quad_hexagon.gif )
Second:
Meshsmooth is kinda "cheating", as you get into the habits of high-poly-modelling, and this aint good, trust me.

@itsphilthy:
nice ones, like the scenes.

@juliao:
nice scene.

@all:
thx, just found some motivation and time to move one with my little sunshine.

ric

Hey Ric, im not entirely sure what is your point here. Are you trying to be helpfull or are you just patronising me??

I dont understand why you need to explain me that 3 vertice poly is a triangle, and 4 vertice a quad......in my last posts i make reference to TRIANGLES ans SQUARES. Plus im not 3 years old.

Next, i dont understand why you say the poly count is the same.... because it just isnt. You have Poly's and you have Faces. If they where the same thing, you wouldnt have that distinction in the software. Yes its true that 2 triangles have 2 faces, and a square have also 2 faces, but the poly count is not the same.

Last but not least, i really dont understand why is meshsmooth cheating? I mean, im not trying to do a playable model, im trying to make a very nice PICTURE ( or render , whatever you prefer ), and in my opinion, you cant do a realistic scene with the current RB4 lines ( like many have said, its just too bumpy!! ). If you take a closer look, those renders from philthy have some kind of mesh smooth ( and by the way, they look fantastic ).

So, in a nut shell, i really dont understand your words towards me, specially if you took the time to awnser positively to everyone last posts exept mine. If you dont like my work, its perfectly fine, just come out an say it . I dont mind the critics at all, good or bad, i just dont like to be patronised without a reason.
Oooh,
JBiturbe, I was just trying to be helpful.
Maybe some things that I type come off wrong as I´m not typing so much in english in general. (me <-- from germany)

And no, neither I don´t like you nor your work. I actually like it.
It´s just that I kinda consider meshsmooth as cheating, because It´s creating tons of polys (depending on iterations) and if you don´t use it correctly, which is happening in most times, it just looks too round, like a stone in the river. (omg, I fear I´m not patronising again)

But hey, I could try this, too, actually, than always argue against it.

*wait a moment*
*see pics below *

Skins by Duke, Hansi (2x) (all loaded from life4pixel)

ric
Attached images
Hey Ric, i guess it was just a comunication problem of mine.

Anyways, i see your point on the meshsmooth, it does round up everything!! But inside meshsmooth you have a tool called "crease", and if you know how to use that you can make some nice detailed stuff!!
I love to use that tool, i dont care if takes ages to render, or if it takes ages to crease all the right edges , the end result is worth it!!
-
(juliao) DELETED by juliao : spam
-
(juliao) DELETED by juliao : spam
One simple and boring render:
Quote from Kina13 :Juliao, have you asked him to post his render here?

se fla aportugues e essa imagem o do henrique sim agora nao intendo sua preucupaçao neste caso ?
e uma imagem publica nao precisa se morder de ciumes por ver uma imagem d eum companheiro seu aqui como coloquei no topico uma imagem editada do henrique nao vejo nada de errado nisso

Quote from bright devil :@e2mustang, leonardo555:
yeah, originally the rbr is a little too low-poly, but there is nothing in the 3d-world that couldn´t be fixed. (see screens...)

@JBiturbo:
First:
polys with 3 vertices --> tris or triangles (clever, huh? oO)
polys with 4 vertices --> quads
I´m kinda sry to have to tell you, that you actually don´t change the polycount by deleting the senseless edges in the middle of your quads. Intern (of any 3d-software), all the faces will still keep divided into triangles... . (according to the sheme shown in the following picture: http://www.ericchadwick.com/po ... ples/tri_quad_hexagon.gif )
Second:
Meshsmooth is kinda "cheating", as you get into the habits of high-poly-modelling, and this aint good, trust me.

@itsphilthy:
nice ones, like the scenes.

@juliao:
nice scene.

@all:
thx, just found some motivation and time to move one with my little sunshine.

ric

very nice rb4 gtr good idea path s3
oh my god so many nice rb4´s and rbr´s, great work folks.
so i couldn't resist to give it also a try. i really hope i find the motivation and time to finish it

greetz caoz
Attached images
Quote from C40Z :oh my god so many nice rb4´s and rbr´s, great work folks.
so i couldn't resist to give it also a try. i really hope i find the motivation and time to finish it greetz caoz

...teh **** dude... You just killed it... Damn nice!
Quote from Bose321 :...teh **** dude... You just killed it... Damn nice!

indeed!!!!

C40Z, you just raised the bar here

If you can take some constructive critics, i would just like to point out the thickness of the tires ( a bit too thick for a GTR, imo ). Seems the front wheels are touching the body because of it also. But thats all i can point out!! Other then that, i think this is showing the best potencial off all the RB models presented here!! Reminds me of the real GT class Supra .

Very, very good job man.

3D LFS renders
(8476 posts, started )

© 2002-2020 Live for Speed - Scawen Roberts, Eric Bailey, Victor van Vlaardingen
All timestamps on this website are displayed in your local timezone
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG