The online racing simulator
Searching in All forums
(788 results)
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
To host using a LAN game you must be using a RFC1918 address, for LFS. The address you gave earlier in this thread is not one of thos ranges, so the only option available to you is to use a "hidden" server and to join in the same way that you would a normal server (i.e. by inputting it's host name).
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
Quote from michele0676 :And why i can't find it with my lfs game in the server list ? Is'it right ?

You're in the same lan, depending on how your home router works it may not show up for technical reasons. Either that or you have filters set incorrectly. Either way, if you are join-able (which you are) then it'll show up for others.
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
Just joined perfectly michele0676
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
Check your config on a window box, or a box with an X server. The odds are that there's something wrong with your config and LFS is throwing an error message up, which will create a messagebox (which requires an X server).
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
That's a question that either your provider can answer, or their help files, I'm afraid.
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
Quote from S14 DRIFT :So it's a catch-22? You can't report users without providing a replay, yet when you are uploading a replay the thread gets removed!

News to me - unless policy has changed and I've not noticed or been told.
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
As BBO@BSR says, you need to contact the developers directly (using the link he posted). We cannot assist you on the forums.
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
1. You've presented no proof - The accepted standard is to provide a replay
2. We don't allowing naming and shaming directly, however in this case since there's no replay I can't see a reason to bother removing it
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
Quote from Mikjen :"""Port 63392 is open under TCP but blocked for UDP and can't be open."""

Change the port number that LFS runs on to one that is supported (i.e. open-able) by your VPS provider. /port=X will set LFS to use TCP/X and UDP/X, where X is a number between 0 and 65535.
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
Quote from Dajmin :Bets are up now. No bonus question yet though.

Still no bonus (BlindIllusions here btw). Given that its kicking off tomorrow I guess we're either gonna get a late bonus or none this race.
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
Quote from Dygear :One query vs many

A single query (hosts) makes scaling your application much easier in my mind (effortless if you've written it correctly), so to me it's a no brainer. Always go for what will make your life easier.

Quote from Dygear :but then there is also a size (bandwith) issue as well as the hosts action produces a HUGE result

When I was faffing with various LFSW related things Victor repeatedly told me that bandwidth is irrelevant for the developers, and given the cost of bandwidth is going down I can't see it being a problem still.

Quote from Dygear :What compression method to use on these querys to best help the server out?

Given the number of people hitting LFSW, and what I suspect the spec of boxes are, I have the feeling that it's again largely irrelevant. I know that the db used to run in memory and then get periodically dumped out as a backup, but that may have changed, or I may have fabricated it completely (my brain is a bit fried atm).

gzdeflate is faster (or at least used to be last time I benched it), but doesn't compress as well. However, we're talking a few bytes here, maybe a few meg at the top end. If you're wanting to make things easier for the devs, then gzdeflate should be an acceptable middle ground imho.
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
Quote from Shadowww :Meh, good ol' times.

Remember it? I still have the 7 floppies it (one of the editions) came on
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
Quote from Roccivic :Where does LFS stand on verbal abuse???

I will start this post by saying that;
  1. I am not employed by the LFS developers
  2. I do not know the official stance of the LFS developers
  3. I am not a lawyer
However, I am fairly confident that the LFS stance is the same as every other online multiplayer game producer - if it's not on an official server (which it wasn't), and it isn't affecting multiple servers, then it is up to the person(s) running that server to dictate policy.
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
Quote from LifeSteala :Is this "InSim Guest Closed" error good or bad? If I wanted to send a message say "Hi, testing InSim from browser" how would I go about that?

It should probably be pointed out that running an full InSim client (something that does more than a single thing before disconnecting - if that's all you're going to be doing then do disregard everything written in the following few sentences) within a web server isn't the most sensible idea for several reasons. The main is that all webservers provide a timeout - some hosts enforce it and some will allow you to change it, but it will eventually hit a limit, and when that happens your client will disconnect. Unless you're running the server yourself, it's almost certain that you'd be violating TOS with your host.

The accepted practise is to run PHP from the command line for anything of this nature.

Quote from 4aged :thanks for your help, i think we will need php version of that though sorry.

I'm not trying to be a dick or anything, but the PHP manual is rather easy to use and provides various examples for most functions and libraries.

Example #2 (if you use the sockets_* library) on this page should give you everything you need to get started, or this page from LXF (if you use the f* functions), in combination with Victor and DarkTimes' posts - you just need to subsitute out the HTTP protocol with the InSim protocol

If you get stuck or don't follow then holler and someone might pop something together for you.
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
Most common answers are:

1. DirectX is either not installed or broken - http://www.microsoft.com/downl ... cd92a3&displaylang=en

2. You aren't using the appropriate driver for your graphics card. Download it from the manufacturer website and install it.

3. You've mangled cfg.txt (in the same directory as LFS.exe) - unlikely if this is a clean installation.

4. A single thread is enough thank you. Posting multiple threads in multiple locations is considered bad manners and likely to cause yourself confusion when people answer. Also try and make the titles slightly more descriptive than "help".
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
Yes, if you edit any of the code you will have to recompile the source.
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
The commands can be found in Command.txt, if you search for "script" you'll jump to the relevant place in the doc.

http://en.lfsmanual.net/wiki/Script_Guide has a nice little guide, but it's not terribly comprehensive.
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
Quote from Danielw597 :If anyone knows what I need and how to implement this, I'd be very thankful.

That's javascript. There are a variety of different off the shelf libraries which will provide this behaviour. Do a quick google for lightbox and you'll see what I mean.
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
Quote from TAYLOR-MANIA :Quiet alot came down here in Somerset

It's still fecking snowing in good old Bristol atm. No gritters have been out where I live either

If only I didn't work from home
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
Quote from StigNumbers :I can't figure out this irritating install system

Extract LFS somewhere. If you don't know where it's gone then either run a search for LFS.exe, or re-extract it again. Don't touch the cfg files manually. Just run LFS.exe. LFS will then be running.
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
Quote from Dygear :However this query returns the error: #1136 - Column count doesn't match value count at row 1;

A select into might be more useful in your situation Dygear -
SELECT `FName`, `LName`, `Status`, `JDate`, `BDate` INTO `members_sorted` FROM `members` ORDER BY `JDate`, `LName`;

Or
INSERT INTO `members_sorted` (`FName`, `LName`, `Status`, `JDate`, `BDate`) VALUES(SELECT `FName`, `LName`, `Status`, `JDate`, `BDate` FROM `members` ORDER BY `JDate`, `LName`);

Either should work, if I've remembered correctly. Edit: That said, a view might even be more appropriate, assuming your SQL engine supports them.
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
Quote from niall09 :Is that really neccesary?

No it's not. Granted it's not difficult to come across, but that's not exactly the point.

Congratulations on your new home Scawen & family
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
A few options for running completely X-less:
1. Recompile Wine without X support
2. Use a package with X support, but don't install the X libraries (you'll still get a lot of cruft, and this may not work, depending on how your distro packages wine)
3. Use wineconsole (which was being phased out, last time I looked into it)

In both cases you need to make sure you have perfect cfg for LFS because if its not perfect LFS will try and either create a window or a dialog box telling you there is an error.

You need to ensure that you're running with /dedicated=invisible and that everything else is correctly and perfectly set in the cfg (which you can either test on a Linux server with X, or on a windows machine).

If you don't care about X and all its crap being installed, you could use xvfb.

Disclaimer: I've not run LFS dedi on Linux for quite sometime, and things may have changed.
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
Quote from Becky Rose :I view topics on the forum as much the same

As do I (and I'm sure if you search back through my post history you'll see I've said that in the past more than once), but I fail to see how you'd have a conversation in real life where you each say 2 words to complete a story, outside of a primary school or a pub where you are insanely drunk.

Quote from Becky Rose :they are fascists ideals

Ouch?

I have the fear that you believe that I've been refering to this very thread, where as I've been loosely refering to any one of the mountains of bollocks from off topic.
the_angry_angel
S3 licensed
Quote from danthebangerboy :Obviously, we all know what spam is

You've just demonstrated that you don't, in my opinion.

Just because the posts within a thread are on topic, doesn't make the entire less any less spam-y.
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG