It's true that a nearly dead community is a motivation killer for a dev.

But still am happy to see some new stuff even if it's irrelevant for the major part of users.

Never seen such childish overreaction from some moders (dauntless...), moding its all about personalise the sim experience and integrating the car you like to drive if you have the capability, it's not like Kunos owe them money for opening their game to them, I don't really get about this shitstorm at all.

In conclusion, a huge part of moders was doing this to showcase their 3d skills only for their ego or profit/job hunting, the fun factor are on the minority side imo.

Juste looking at the AC forum thread, the majority of excessive reaction ans whining are from the eternal WIP specialists...

Yea we don't need such half baked eternal WIP projects anymore.

If they gave up on AC modding with such meaningless justification, that mean their motivation are not enough to even half finish their actual projects, better for them to return to a showcase website like devian-art so they can have their daily dose of "great work" "thanks" etc....

Quote from k_badam :

A lot of the mods on the AC forums are on racedepartment so i wouldn't worry too much. The only problem is that I won't be able to keep up with W.I.Ps that were on the AC forums as i don't know where to find them.

Lot of them will transfer their projects here : http://www.racedepartment.com/forums/assetto-corsa-modding-discussions.414/

They are not insane, they know there is other forums who can replace easily their official place for modding purposes.

I think they are cleaning a bit the forum so they will gain more free time when the consoles crowd invade the forum with their issues/wish listes.

The sim is still modable, so who cares about which place you can showcase or download your mod.

If you can keep your privacy over the net ( not using real name or real addresses ), you won't be affected by any kind of bullying or harassment, it's as simply as that.

Quote from Eclipsed :

Probably. We do not really know much is and in what order is in Scawen's (main programmer) to-do list,all we know that new tyre physics and VR support is on the top of that list,probably adding content to S3 licence too,but that's rather Eric's (LFS artist) job. But he obviously intends to make this sim as good as he can,he seems to be sort of a perfectionist - he tends to iron out all possible glitches before calling a release official,not like his italian colleagues,who tend to throw all they got to public and then deal with whatever is wrong there.
What we got here is how far he is now with it.

And its seems like their italian colleagues have a far better popular sim than us who are actually "facepalming" in front of our empty server list... maybe perfectionism are not a good way to do things after all.

It's true that RB4 interior are the pinnacle of perfection... just sayin...because being blind in front of LFS situation will not improve mp popularity.

No news since nearly 2 months, I hope it's the calm before the storm ( in a good way ).

https://www.lfs.net/forum/thread/88451-Turkish-LFS-demo-servers-use-their-presence-to-promote-illegal-S2-servers

Similar post, and long discussion if you want to read different opinions.

let them be, you are wasting your time, I guess we all have more important things to do.

It's not about incomes, but to bring back some popularity into this game.

Steam DLC system is good enough to split the game into s1, s2 etc, plus they can add a layer of online check for more security.

I think steam automaticly convert currency for differente countries, maybe they are playing with their prices share part too to increase or decrease prices per market, it's a good system to get more people into their platform games.

I completely agree about the actuale state of game, it's not ready yet.

We discussed about this in this topic : https://www.lfs.net/forum/thread/89404-Where-the-hell-are-the-racing-servers%3F/page/2, you can find opinions and responses for what you are seeking.

And like I said, LFS is not ready enough for steam, at the actual state it will be a failure like the relaunched Rf1 on steam.

Quote from truntteri :

ac have big input lag between steering wheel and virtual wheel. Lfs no lag. LFS BEST!

Lmao!

Quote from RC-Maus :

Haha u think?

I bet.

Quote from UnknownMaster21 :

I still feel it needs some kind of picture though

So I suggest this :



or this ( to show the seriousness of the sim for those who dislike good graphics in simracing ) :

Quote from Scawen :

As a test I've made a slight change to the first text at www.lfs.net so it doesn't show that picture including the Scirocco. I've tried to make the text a little more compact as well so the news item below is more likely to be seen.

Good decision, people will not ask anymore about that car.

There is nothing weird, the dev found himself stuck in a huge and complex task called tires physics, that practically delayed the whole things that was supposed to be released with the new and shiny s3, but things went different and the dev lost his motivation from 2009 to 2014 when he start suddenly to return slowly into lfs development because of his VR interest.

You are new into LFS so its only natural that you don't know what really happened, and If I was Scawen I will be glade and motivated to see someone new with a good impression about lfs development.

But well you are pretty lucky, he's more active now so you don't have to wait for updates like we used to.

Now you're taking us into a sensitive topic, for some this VW scirocco is the symbol of LFS decadence, broken promise or false hope, leaving the drama part, the story is this car was announced on late 2008 but not released yet because of the game tires physics which I suppose aren't well compatible with some real life data and gave a weird behavior to the car, and now we're waiting to see a new version from scawen, for now it's only "simulated" through lfs car viewer.

But I find that its pretty risky to advertise the game with a no functional content, it's true that licensed contents is appealing to the public, but for this one it's really a bad decision...

It's a free addition to the s1/s2/s3 holders btw.

Last edited by lfsrm, Sat 23 Apr 2016, 00:52.

Quote from bobloblaw :

I would say wait 1-2 years for updates, and then we'll see if you think LFS needs to be on steam. Money isn't the problem for slow development. If you read the forums you'd see that money was the reason Scawen finally started working on LFS again.

And I'm not bashing Steam users as being only casual gamers. I'm saying that if people want to play LFS they can come to LFS.net, its not too hard . This is an, 'if you build it they will come' scenerio.

Lol when you see people have only steam shortcut and the FB page on their browser home webpage, you sure are underestimating how people know about games nowadays.

Quote from t-race :

With the current model has spread LFS, modding is not needed primarily for developers. Since no one will buy the extra content (for example S3), so do not expect such a move. Entering the trading platform Steam, it seems to me, are not needed. Whom did you find there? LFS is a very specific game is not for the casual gamers. Also, many beginners (first demo users), which first launched LFS, discourages the drive of these cars, and not the last role in this is the default set, which I think is disgusting to ride on Blackwood. Yes, leave "hard_track" and "race_s" it is necessary, if only to demonstrate the car's settings possible, but need also add a normal settings for Blackwood, preferably is selected by default for demo users. That is, the more carefully treat the novice, who came first in the LFS and discover a genre of car simulator, and not with the settings, which have over half lap killed tires, because at the slightest brake pedal is pressed the machine locks the wheels and goes sliding. The first reaction in these: "What the hell? How to drive this sh*t?", The result is: uninstall. It's my personal opinion. And sorry google for translation it in to eng. =)

Once again, even those who are considered "serious racers" are on steam ( AC, RF2, automobilista... ), so it's a nonsense to tie steam to casual players.

Quote from Eclipsed :

What's so limited about LFS?

Cmon you can't bring back those who raced 100 000 laps on the same tracks over 10 years, at least we can gain some new souls if all the contents would be overhauled like the new westhill, and to bring back those whos suffered longtime boredom we need more variables ( real time weather, rain etc ) to the existing track for less repetitiveness, and new contents for the S3 license to raise the devs income.

But all these fancy things are useless if the games won't reach gamers where they are, unless the dev have unlimited marketing capability to advertise their game outside steam and other popular sociale platforms, but for now GOG, steam, etc are the most cheap and efficient way to sell more and revive the game at the same time.

But hey, scawen has the same idea with oculus store, so I don't see him refuse to sell his game on similar platforme in the longterm futur.

Quote from TFalke55 :

To be honest, having proper RX cars would be nicer to have then this compromise.

More Rx cars/track or even some rallys stage would be awesome !

Quote from sinbad :

AC does have good body movement, yes, but netcode to match and represent that? Not yet... The Fiesta ahead looks realistic for about 5% of the time it is cornering.

1 - because AC does not simulate dirt surfaces plus the supposed dirt sections on bl2 mod have too much grip.

2 - It's still a mod and not the official content, the team behind it is not the most talented in physics area.

Quote from Eclipsed :

There you go,another shortcut by italians... It's shouldn't be specific software for some animations,car's visual movement should do just that what physics engine tells to.

Anyway - I recall console "sims" GT/Forza also being very nicely and quite realistic animated,still anyone hardly calls them proper sims...

Do you took a look into AC code to make such assumptions ?

And what wrong with a external lib for animations ? maybe they are using it to translate complex physics values into 3d engine, no one know about that better than dev himself.

Even lfs is using external programs to simulate things who know...

Yea, it's like the car body stop too early from moving when it touch the ground, or because of the flat physics mesh of lfs.

I think stefano said he used a special dedicated software only for car animation, that's why he managed this great result.