If you load the boot up with stuff, the boot sits much lower, but the front hardly moves. This points the light up in the air - which would dazzle other drivers (as dipped beams have a cut-off to prevent this).
To adjust this, you have a dial you can turn to adjust the level of the headlights... however nobody ever seems to.
Because HID's / Xenon's can blind more easily, equipment in the car is installed to adjust them automatically. In the case of my car, there are sensors on the suspension that monitor the pitch of the car, and adjust the lights accordingly.
If you watch a big Range Rover go over a large bump, you'll probably notice how it blinds you (high up lights do that...), then suddenly the beam goes down and then it returns to normal as the car settles back.
I'm sorry... WTF?! This coming from a man whos pimpin' ride is an 80's Jetta?
Obviously, I would have no idea what driving a Westfeild is like, after all I own a "Rover"... wait a second...
Sound helps, but when your sitting so low it still feels faster. Plus a "simpler" car links you to the car much more directly, so again you are more involved in the speed of the car.
But your right... "Rovers" don't sound good. Ever.
No, they don't - very few cars have Xenons as standard (although many have projectors), and most cars on the road anyway.
I'd say even on new car sales it's probably about 40%...
VOSA could prohibition the car for breaking contruction and use if they wanted to... but it's a LOT of effort. I've never heard of it being done, though. Same for decats...
Anyway, like I said I have OEM projector Xenons in my car, so I know the alignment is fine... but thanks to the new MOT changes it seems I may now need to spend ~£100 (more than the lights cost in the first place!) getting the power-wash (pointless) and leveling (pointless - my cars load never changes) in... awesome.
I thought that applied only to the main beams, as a pose to dipped headlights?
Errr, what? You can have Xenons in Reflectors (legally), and you can have halogens in Projectors (legally).
Running Xenons / HID's without powerwash / self-levelling is illegal in the fact it breaks construction & use regs, but you wouldn't fail your MOT for it.
Did ANYONE mention it was bad because you weren't doing it for performance?
Have you even seen my car?
I have absolutley no problem with people upgrading their cars... be it for looks, performance, ICE, general usefulness.
However, I can't quite understand why someone would deliberately fit lights which will provide LESS usable light... so they look cool. Especially when they look rubbish, and blind other road users.
Not always - pretty much all the lights in my car use CANBUS (which triggers a warning when a light is out), but you can get round this with resistors. Having said that, HID's draw enough curent not to set it off in the first place.
ja
Each bulb needs it's own ballast - it's why each bulb already has it's own unique ballast.
Not only would it suck, but it's also illegal as well - HID's take a while to warm up, and would fail the MOT because they don't come on quick enough (although I have no idea what the situation is on the CI).
Some companies have cheats to get around this (i.e. overvolt for the first second), but to be honest the only way around it (currently) is a much, MUCH more expensive HID kit.
Why would you want that?
10000k = useless for a start - even 6000k is too blue. The optimum is 5000k.
This. Or at least, if you DO use reflectors, at least get the HxR bulbs which are designed for reflector headlights.
I've tried HID's in the past - but for a start 6000k was too blue, with not enough light output, and secondly the glare (I was a wanker with HID's in reflectors...) was atrocious. I found it much easier to buy the optional-extra Xenon projector headlights on eBay from a breaker (was only ~£80). No more dazzling, better light output, and a better lens as well.
However, if you can't find projectors for your car, here's (1, 2 & 3) what i'd do (to do it PROPERLY)... in short, you can buy HID's built into a projector lens, and then manually fit the projector lens into your headlights.
No, it's not. You have up to 6 years to claim, where reasonable. I would not say that 5 years is "reasonable" on a sub-£200 console, especially when it's specifically sold as pre-owned.
After the first 6 months you'd have to prove it was an inherent fault... but on the 360 that wouldn't be too hard.
Well had you not of opened it you would of got a repair anyway... and you certainly wouldn't of got a replacement (or at least, you might of got a pro-rata refund on a pre-owned, old, last model Xbox, which would be very very low).
If you were to take it to court for poor workmanship, all thy would be expected to do is put things right (either fulfill their obligation, or put you back to the position you were in before...)
I can't help thinking buying a warranty and then voiding it trying to fix it is a little like getting a dog and barking yourself.
Shotglass is right... the GTS250 is an 8800. Theres nothing wrong with the 8800, and i'm sure if you got one one on eBay or something it'd be a brilliant budget card... but asking nearly £100 for a 3-generation-old card is ridiculous
While they may say opening it voided the warranty (it's debatable), thats not the problem in question - while the warranty may be void, that means they are not obligated to repair it. That does not mean you can open it up.
However, you will have to prove that they are at fault... which could be quite hard. Especially as you've now removed the seal.
However, for a £100 Xbox I really *really* wouldn't bother. If you really are an "IT Engineer" it would take you less time to fix the bodge than answer the email.
Oh yes, and I'd be surprised if you got an reply, it's slightly too ranty / derogatory. Plus, you've given then no compelling reason to reply.
Also, don't threaten court unless you intend to do it and actually understand it... it makes you look like a bell-end.
For example, what do YOU think would happen once you took it to court? What would be the net result?