Please contribute to your community. I'm especially looking for information that you can't just google, i.e. personal experience, pros and cons, opinions...
LFS - free content-limited demo / S1 license (more cars/tracks) £12 / S2 license (even more cars/tracks) £24
+ development in progress - working on new tyre physics and game content
+ fully compatible with G25 and most other peripherals
+ low system requirements, basic but very functional graphics and sound, fery flexible gfx/audio engine and controls
+ good multiplayer but racing sometimes ruined by idiots and trolls on free demo servers, also most servers are located around EU (high pings from overseas *)
+ quick and easy pickup races
- outdated graphical engine
rFactor 2
+ lots of mods to choose from
- need to have correct mod(s) for different servers
Outdated as it might be, it is still interesting to watch. I wanted to just click it through as I do with porn but I actually ended up watching the whole damn thing.
As for you guys starting the never-ending development discussion again, I say that Scawen is not just developing tyre physics. He is developing a platform, because on those tyre physics (which will be more versatile than now), he can build new suspension types, maybe flexible body physics, weather conditions etc. Now, you'd have to program a new type of simulation for wet track. With the new tyre physics, he'd just set amount_of_water_on_track_polygon = 1.2l and off you go aquaplanning. But don't quote me on that
You need the best possible platform to build success on it.
Dude I wish I could argue with you about this, but I'm gonna get laid instead.
Edit: And sorry for OT. I believe that the car handling will actually change with the new tyre model, because that's actually Scawen's motivation to work on the new physics. He isn't satisfied with the handling of the current model. I don't know how much it will influence FOX but hey, maybe you will like it even more.
I think you are right and that's the reason why we still don't have the tyre physics update. Scawen, the perfectionist that he is, still didn't get to the final digit of Pi, hence his tyre physics calculations are still not precise enough.
You sound like a type of person who would enjoy playing a bureaucracy simulator I doubt it would be as much fun if you'd have to spend 10 minutes of mission time sitting in a traffic jam.
More realistic AI does not have to necessarily mean better AI for the purposes of this game. When I'm starting up GTA IV, that's because I want to run over hobos with an SUV while watching the stupid pig-cops crash into each other during a car-chase. I don't want to be picked-off buy one police sniper sitting on a helicopter after the first 10 seconds.
I suggest using these for better enjoyment of the next GTA installment. :P
For the many laughs that I had thanks to this thread, I now return the favor to the community. Please appreciate all the work that goes into embedding all the f***ing images, 'cause it's really annoying. Now...Enjoy!
Technically, there is no protection. But it's your work and should be protected by the copyright laws of some country (your's maybe or England's since LFS is a British product).
Complaining here won't help you. Take advantage of your legal system. Find out the identity of the demo-player and take him to court and ask for the damages to be paid/settled (if you have definitive proof that he did it).
In other words: There is nothing you can do about it, but masturbating usually relieves the anger and tension.
Echo a unique string after each suspicious line of code to see where the program stops. Or echo the important variables at various point to work as "watches" for values.