Oh damn i hoped nobody would see that! It is from my gf.
Oh damn i hoped nobody would see that! It is from my gf.
a very pumped Silvertop engine inside that runs with about 0.7-1.2 bars, all depending on outside temp.
But the engine is not healthy to say the least. it was clocked on the Dyno to 345bhp but that was on 1.6 bar just for de lulz!
but no, people get surprised when they pull up on the side of my very sleepish looking Corolla.
I guess the reason why we have different opinions about the Audi is just a matter of what kind of performance we might want from a car called sleeper. I happen to know that many stock Audis have a, might I say, decent performance, so just under 8 seconds from 0 to 100 (or 62) isn't sleeper in my mind. I guess it's a little on the sleeperish side tho, it has a performance what would be really enjoyable for a daily driver.
I guess I might have even thought different some time ago but after owning and driving a much faster car (a sleeper type of car actually) it has changed my expectations for performance.
i has 350bph on 0.0 bar, lulz!
I have 90hp in my NA 0.0bar non turbo-boosted all motor Jetta.
There's a jetta near us, dropped on it's arse, not as clean as yours though. I'll see if i can sneak a few pics 
i assembled my back seat/rear deck and vanity lights and it fixed my brakelight issue.
make any sense? would it be connected at all to the rear lights?
make any sense? would it be connected at all to the rear lights?
Looking forward to it
Jesus... You must be burning one front wheel all the time! My corolla has a terribly knocking 2e-e inside it. It had 74hp when new, not sure how much is left, and how much longer will it suffer. Still interesting to drive, as shock absorbers are completely dead. Feels like a rollercoaster lol.
I've always wanted to take a crappy car and put a turbo in it, and shut the wastegate completely, just to see what happens. But maybe something RWD. Probably a Lada, as their engines cost next to nothing over here.
Nice
Sensible is no funI would of stayed with the Golf.
Whyyyy?
Squeaky-clean dealership shot...
Because 350Z is boring....
yeah...fwd hatchback is MUCH more fun than a well setup rwd car.
Because you should have bought a BMW!!
As above.
Think of it that way:
Golf is closer to scirocco then a 350Z.
Golf is closer to scirocco then a 350Z.
My point still stands?
Since when is the 350Z boring? I love how they sound 
Yeah the Golf and Scirocco are both still uninteresting 
Didn't like any of the BMWs I could get for the same money. I wanted something with 2 seats, a few toys, and realistic to fund. Test drove a couple of S2000s but the insurance is killer (I'm 24 with only 2 years NCB). Z4s and Boxsters are too expensive, MX-5s are too slow etc.
This is a lovely example with reasonable mileage, pre 2006 so not in the £445/year tax bracket (although that does mean it misses out on the slightly newer engine
) and "only" costs £200/year more than the Golf to insure...
Didn't like any of the BMWs I could get for the same money. I wanted something with 2 seats, a few toys, and realistic to fund. Test drove a couple of S2000s but the insurance is killer (I'm 24 with only 2 years NCB). Z4s and Boxsters are too expensive, MX-5s are too slow etc.
This is a lovely example with reasonable mileage, pre 2006 so not in the £445/year tax bracket (although that does mean it misses out on the slightly newer engine
) and "only" costs £200/year more than the Golf to insure...I was only kidding with the BMW lol..
Nothing wrong with the 350z, defiantly better than the glof.
How much is the Z to insure?
How I see things is that if u get a impractical car, then it has to look good and go fast, which in my opinion the 350z does neither, true, it goes faster then the golf.
Never used to be keen on 350Z's, but these videos have converted me recently:
http://youtu.be/7iQM9v8Al08?hd=1
http://youtu.be/GKqzQg7MHC4?hd=1
http://youtu.be/7iQM9v8Al08?hd=1
http://youtu.be/GKqzQg7MHC4?hd=1
This thread is closed
Post your Car!
(15536 posts, closed, started )
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG