the thing id like to achieve is practicing some exercise to breathe more with my righ nostril which happens very rarely, to be more logical

i bet none here breathe freely through both nostrils, i just can recall two times when i did that and feels very good

i bet most of you breath mainly through right nostril you are way too much logical

i posted this with the hope someone practices yoga, nobody? come on of hundreds nobody

doctors just dont study this nostril alternation, i know casue my sister is a doctor, but yogis have paid attention to it for thousands of years

i respect yogis and their knowledge for what they can do like for example reducing beat heart at will or controlling body temperature and who knows

yoga sites say what i say, science ones not but as a matter of fact im permanently breathing, except rare ocasions that confirm that my nose is healthy, always through my left nostril

and how would you define me as logical or imaginative, left or righter hemi

Quote from Klutch :

FFs, start your own thread again.
Keep this nonsense rambling in that.

now that does it, im starting my own forum and let none in

a doctor would see this as stupid

but elite sports man put something in their nose to breathe through both nostrils i guess

all im asking is a trick to reverse block nostril, anyone into yoga should know

or yoga is nerd

normally one nostril is partially blocked and the other free, this is related with the brain hemisphere youre using

they exchange every 2 or 3 hours, which means brain main hemisphere has swithced as well

during the last months ive checked and i permanently breath only through my left nostril having the right one almost always blocked

this appears to be unhealthy,very, and in a way explains how im am always with my right hemisphere dominating the creative and imaginative having the logical one in lazyness

i tried some exercise i found on the net to be able to breath through my right nostril, im even cosidering vicks vaporus, but nothing, always breathing wrong permanently only through my left nostril

anyone into yoga who can help me?

i kind of understand why the guy does it, if you are different youll go though so much crab in a forum

i dont mind going through that because if someone critize me i label them as morons so i dont mind

but if you are difeerent and not thick skinned you just cant join a forum people is way too cruel

seems like a vengeance to me he cant hang around in any froum so he makes his own and let noone in

poor guy hating the whole world for a litle retard ones

i wonder how longer before ai creates better songs

just imagine a program randomly creating almost infinite melodies with a phi ratio

humans would only be used as test subjects to see to which tune they dance more

already seen it, general agreement is its a fake, funny though

hint: airbags dont shoot that easily

Last edited by lerts, Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:22.

no no i meant lfs

i think its due to the camera being very far from the trajectory

talking of odd feeling playing fps sometimes my perception is strange but feels very good, i can locate better origin of sound my field of view grows

im pretty sure games are a godd fitness for the brain
edit:

wow im trying ballistics

actually if i use chase view in this game from far away i feel sea sick just as if i had been in a real car, doesnt happen with close views

talking of physics here theres a problem in which the universe goes from 0 momentum to acquire certain angular momentum(independently of the energy spent to do this this is regarded as imposible)

http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e222/raaaid/momento.jpg

so why to build the lhc to test wrong concepts when conservation of momentum appears to be wrong with this example, its normal the universe is unbalanced, that drawing proves it

edit:

if i posted this on a physics forums id get banned, again, for posting theories that disagree with accepted science

edit:

what the hell ill post it and take the chance, i already got permabanned on the main internet physics forums but i have the right to spread my ideas dont i?

Last edited by lerts, Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:59.

one effect of this variation of gravity force with distance is spaguetization as you fall into a black hole, your feet are atracted stronger than your head so you spaguetize

anyway in my example potential energy is spent though the cog is raised (thanks for teaching me that), but this points gravity as a force that in certain cases will expand the universe

thats what i dont understand how can potential energy be 0 at infinite distance?

shouldnt it be 0 at the center of the earth and a big amount at infinite distance?

i mean thats exactly the oposite to what i thought, the highest you are the more potential energy

then according that formula at the center of the earth there would be infinite potential energy

come on this science must come from the petrol companies

edit:

i had aplied that formula before without understanding it which i still dont understand yet and yes the cog will raise becoming potential energy more negative

but some questions

does it make any sense talking of a negative energy? what does it do negative work? seems to me intended to confuse

because actually the potential energy of an object at infinity is the work necesary to take that object from the center of the planet to infinity

so from this point of view which has more energy the cog of the bar in the center of the earth or the cog raised by gravity?

i dont know ill have to learn to integrate to find out but the fact that the cog raises by gravity gives me some clues

Last edited by lerts, Sat, 3 Jan 2009 17:10.

thanks i had already gone through that link but dont really understand it

it says u=-g*m1*m2/r

u whats u, potential energy? it cant be cause distance, r, is dividing, so the bigger the distance the smaller the potential energy?¿¿¿

g the gravitational constant, m1 and m2 the masses and r the distance but as i said how can potentional gravitational energy decrease with distance as the r is dividing?!!!1111

s14 the concept i ask about is extreamly simple: closer objects are pulled harder by gravity, therefore the closer weight will be pulled more with the unusual outcome of lifting the center of gravity of the masses

this is quite odd and who knows if anybody else thought of this problem before

you should know what im talking about its high school, ill be educative:

newton finds out after an apple hits his head, probably false, that as you double the distance to a celestial body its force of gravity decreases 4 times

in other words the closer you are to a planet the stronger gravity is

but this gives a result odities as creating energy without moving the cog of the system which i thought till now was imposible and whats more even creating energy while also raising the cog

so you understand this:

imagine a giant simple pulley with 2 masses hanging, one mass is double distance form earth center than the other, by what i already said whats the force of gravity over it?

thats it double distance 4 times less force of gravity

so the closer mass to earth will pull 4 times harder creating energy by friction for example as it moves

but notice that exactly the same distance one mass rises the other mass as much lowers, so the cog of the system remains static

and here is an example where energy could be created while even lifting the cog:

http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e222/raaaid/raise.jpg

now ive teach somebody something someone could teach me someone how to calculate the potential energy of each weight while taking into account that as height doubles gravity force decreases 4 times?

an image worht a thousand words, here a consequence of gravitation law(how gravity force varies with distance)

http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e222/raaaid/raise.jpg

edit:

thanks im learning to draw i hope one day to tell my ideas through comic

i think one of the reasons i see this things is because im able to simplify a lot

if you put 2 equal weights with a very long arm that goes through earth, arm long enough so force of gravity varies with distance and the cog of the weights is in the midle of earth what will happen?

theyll be on unstable balance, at any moment one weight will be getting closer to earth, increasing the force of gravity over it, while the other weight will increase distance decreasing force of gravity over it

so gravity will pull one stronger and stronger and the other weaker and weaker with which the cog of the weights will lift at least as much as the arm is long

a think this proves at least to me and till im proved wrong that taught science is a petrol companies teaching

humm thats correct, that would be the center of mass for 1 and 2 kg

well then imagine where it says 4 kg i correct it and put 2 kg

then the 1kg would be pulled with 6.6 N and the "2" kg with 120 N

so my point still holds valid if you analize the force on the weights caused by gravity on each weight the cog will raise

on the other hand you cant consider the weights with the bar as the same as an equal spot mass in the cog

the slightest speed they had would multiply by infinite as the radius of the cog becomes 0 as cons of mom states(think every time you half the radius you double its speed and to make it 0 youll have to double it forever), so this isnt valid you must consider both weights independently with wich newton predicted the cog will raise by gravity in this case

nono its not attached to the planet the weights are attached to each other and go through a tunnel on earth without touching earth

and the tunnel goes north south so thers no centrifugal force

just imagine this as a high school problem, calcualte the force of gravity that the planet earth exerces over each weight using universal gravitational law by newton and youll find out like me the cog will move up with a huge force(as well as the planet with equal oposite force)

maybe force of gravity though appears to take mass to the center actually spits it out as this isolated system case, earth- bar with weights

that would explain universe expansion, its due to gravity

yes thats my point if you treat them like a system being the cog of the weights in the midle of the earth they wont move

but if you look at each force of each weight independently the bigger one will push harder due to being more weight and being closer to the well of gravity (earth) so it will move, remember force of gravity is divided by distance squared so the closer the greater

if nobody points to a flaw on this i will post it in a phisics forums

maybe noone in this age thought of this

i just aplied f=g*m1*m2/d^2, the universal gravitational law from newton

http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e222/raaaid/cograise.jpg

on this diagram you can see a north-south tunnel trough earth through which it goes a weightless arm that unites 2 weights of 1 kg and 4 kg each being at an altitude of 3*10E12m and 1*10E12m each so the cog of the weight system will be at the middle of the earth

f=g*m1*m2/d^2

if earth mass is 6*10E24kg

F1=10*6*10E24kg*1kg/9*10E24m=6.6N

F2=10*6*10E24kg*4kg/1*10E24m=240N

gravitational law predicts a raise of cog of the system

do you think that does this contradict science?

hell i hope not to be banned again for being urkel like

Last edited by lerts, Fri, 2 Jan 2009 15:55.

if 4 wheels are at the grip limit and you lift the clutch engine brake will skid the back wheels cause you were at the limit

and you are not gonna take the whole brake zone with the clutch depressed

so actually if you want to use the maximum braking grip you must engine brake so 4 wheels will be at the limit of grip

otherwise your back wheels will be undergrip or overgrip(skidding) depending on how much the engine is braking

is not that im able to do that but seems most logical to me and when i used bikes in an emergency engine brake helped

haha though what i say might be true im joking as well

well we dont mind if the level of water grows 1 cm a year, what we dont want is it to grow 1000 m suddenly

what did einstein say on atlantis?

its posible that the ice caps grew so thick the centrifugal force displaced the whole crust ending the poles in the equator and causing a flood that destoryed civilizations

of course einstein was a pussy and he said only the crust not to disagree with momentum conservation imo the whole earth axe might end offset 90º just as some planets of this solar system

then if we listen to einstein the danger is not the ice caps to shrink but to grow

if you dont understand what einstein said imagine you are a fat ice cap in the center axe of a rotating platform, when you put yourself just 1mm offset youl be taken to the equator of the platform by centrifugal force

such brilliant minds cant not know this and if they want to cool the planet means they want the ice caps to grow so they want them to end in the equator to cause a flood and the destruction of this civilization

now you know the truth, dont trust al gore he is lying, einstein was right and use a lot of energy so the planet keeps warm and those ice caps dont grow dangerly

yes but are they lasting?, hadnt had a godd experience with my last red pumas

i find nike more durable

but however stupid you find it ive been last 6 years wearing red snikers which i like how they combine with denim but cant find them any more red

what do you suggest me? give up and buy lame white ones as forced by the system or what

edit:

what about the size?

in spain i use a 43 and im 1,83m tall, should i get a 43 from that puma site?

edit postedit:

wow i like more and more the shoes, i also find anoying having to sock driving due to normally being with my sneakers on at home and find anoying having to take them off just to play

edit3:

ive notice the shop is usa being in dollars, can i buy from them here in spain?

Last edited by lerts, Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:56.

hell ive been searching for red sneakers for 1 month and nothing

i gave up seems to be some kind of conspiracy from the fashion looby so i cant have red pumas

hell where can i get those amazing shoes?