because they don't want to. That's all there is to it. End of story, they have thought about it and have decided that they don't want more help.
*gags at being lumped together with kentucky*
wow...... so many complainers about roll cages.
Adding a roll cage doesn't make the car not a road car. It's still not a race prepped car, i just has the safety features required to race.
In racing you either follow the rules, or you don't get on the track. If it comes down to mass and distribution differences, here's what a marshall will tell you: You'll either cage it and like it, or you'll take it home.
Adding a roll cage doesn't make the car not a road car. It's still not a race prepped car, i just has the safety features required to race.
In racing you either follow the rules, or you don't get on the track. If it comes down to mass and distribution differences, here's what a marshall will tell you: You'll either cage it and like it, or you'll take it home.
Think we can get the UK lumped too, since we're lumping unions together?
#25 will be withdrawing from this race and further races. Logistics simply doesnt allow for 2 cars
I kinda like Banshee's more than TeazR's. Both are absolutely excellent, but my preference it toward Banshee's and it seems a little more in line with the style of event logos that came before it
okay, done enough reading.
Live for speed is a video game. ipso facto. It falls in the simulation sub-genre, but it is in fact still a game.
In order for a game to be successful there is a basic criteria it must meet. It must be fun. When it becomes a chore to play, it will no longer be a game, and nobody will want to play.
The realistic physics make it fun. The close racing makes it fun. The availability of information to learn from makes it fun. In fact just learning the "rules" of the game is in itself fun and rewarding.
If you don't like Scavier's approach to developing thier game, you're welcome to go off and go make an rFactor mod, or start programming your own. When you've made it the way YOU (realism nazi's, yes all 6 of you) want it, try to market it. I'm sure that once you do so, very few will be willing to bother with your game as it would be a CHORE.
Live for speed is a video game. ipso facto. It falls in the simulation sub-genre, but it is in fact still a game.
In order for a game to be successful there is a basic criteria it must meet. It must be fun. When it becomes a chore to play, it will no longer be a game, and nobody will want to play.
The realistic physics make it fun. The close racing makes it fun. The availability of information to learn from makes it fun. In fact just learning the "rules" of the game is in itself fun and rewarding.
If you don't like Scavier's approach to developing thier game, you're welcome to go off and go make an rFactor mod, or start programming your own. When you've made it the way YOU (realism nazi's, yes all 6 of you) want it, try to market it. I'm sure that once you do so, very few will be willing to bother with your game as it would be a CHORE.
Last edited by KeiichiRX7, .
Well, it would certainly get it's ass handed to it by an F1 car of just about any year after the introduction of downforce.
however it would deffinitely be an interesting drive in LFS combining masive power with an unusual chassis. I dare say many would welcome the challenge
however it would deffinitely be an interesting drive in LFS combining masive power with an unusual chassis. I dare say many would welcome the challenge
Power wise the Espace F1 could have beat out the BF1. It was running the old V10 spec engines.
While I agree that a huge section of highway would be boring as hell, one must not overlook the possibility of the highway section only carying on till the next major exit, or using a set of high speed curves on the highway.
some of the curves on the freeway on my morning trip home (with next to nobody on the road) can be quite interesting at 110 mph
some of the curves on the freeway on my morning trip home (with next to nobody on the road) can be quite interesting at 110 mph
Cycling and motorsport have thier own traditions. In motorsport it's tradition not to issue anyone that number.
So youre too lazy to adjust your gears when you have the option?
actually i dont think they care what you do with outguage.
but hey
but hey
Precisely, your engine sim produces quite a good sound, and I wonder how well it would work taking data from LFS
Todd, any chance we could get these simulations hooked up to OutGuage?
That would be pretty cool
That would be pretty cool
Hmmmm You must be refering to the "Keiichi" part of my nick, and inferring a reference to Tsuchiya. A common mistake actually, but it's a tip of the hat to Keiichi Morisato from AA Megami-sama, a rather popular anime by Fujishima.
As for the RX7 part, who doesn't like art in motion? Besides I was workon on ressurecting an old FB for a few months. Sadly money ran out before just after I got the engine running.
Don't know what youre smoking but the JGTC Skylines are FR layout. As for comparing a JGTC Supra and an FZ50 GTR.... Engines at the wrong end. To be honest We coudl stand another Front engine Rear drive GTR, with a naturally aspirated engine. We could also use a Mid Engine GTR for sure, but lets be intelligent enough to stop slagging off cars just because of where they come from.
Says the person who takes thier name from Initial D.
For you I suggest watching the following episode of VOD cars, In which a properly prepared Civic CRX dusts a Lamborghini Galardo
http://youtube.com/watch?v=uG1roCjcca0
Last edited by KeiichiRX7, .
They Don't have all the same restrictors. The turbocharged require more restriction, as they are forced induction
I'll step up if you want, since ya already know me
Really you guys need an insim program for qualification. I know for a fct that more than 32 people did laps in Qualy. My own time got bumped off the bottom because it only shows 32 entries.
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG