No it is not that "simple".
BC2 and MOH use the same engine afaik. So explain me the difference, why does MOH run twice as fast as BC2 runs? The engine does not set the intensitivity.
Its more about whats loaded in the memory, how many active elements are on the field etc. Also, depends how well the code is built. GTA IV runs on shitty a** RAGE engine wich cant provide any sense of realistic graphics and yet needs so much resources. Same with Cryengine, the new engine is promised to run faster and as u already now - it provides many upgrades and some more fancy stuff.
All u talk about is kitchen ... its old and lame.
Ontopic, i wonder if this game will have a long support. Also the destruction of the buldings is awesome. In IGN reverse theatre they saw that even small bricks go boom. Not just whole walls.
Edit:
Dont rely on just the specs they recommend.
GTA IV has pretty intensive recommendations too, yet there are people who play it with Pentium 4. Those recommended specs are just wrong. They give u a picture to understand a bit - how intensive the game is. But dont be like "it needs dual core".
Last edited by hazaky, .
I'd call this a "no texture on FZR headlights" mod. Its plain yellow 
I havnt heard anything about remake. In my opinion, the first RE was just badass. Imma search for this remake.
(But i gotta admit, sometimes i lack balls for playin such games)
Resident Evil is pretty much "no more" in my opinion. The more sequels they make, the worser it gets.
Looks awesome so far. I wonder if this is gonna be blood pumping action game or more like FEAR?
Gran Turismo 5. I dont know why, i dont even have a PS3.
Right now im listening trough my broken Creative HS-1000 headset. Usually im with my lovely vintage 2x RRR S90's (30w rms) and annoy my neighbours with them (being very serious, people who know about audio - will understand).
That pretty much sums it up.
That pretty much sums it up.
In the trailer there was "and the new generation nanosuit". Dunno whats the difference tho.
1) This is not the movie section.
2) I wouldnt call that a movie.
3) Old lfs?
2) I wouldnt call that a movie.
3) Old lfs?
Noone will buy a voucher for u. Earn it.
Also, u should have contacted the devs first, to fix the problem with ur voucher.
Also, u should have contacted the devs first, to fix the problem with ur voucher.
RWJ has reviewed it now.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOe4jA9vKjE
One thing i didnt notice myself, is once the woman gets out of the car - she's putting something (looks like a cellphone) back into her pocket.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOe4jA9vKjE
One thing i didnt notice myself, is once the woman gets out of the car - she's putting something (looks like a cellphone) back into her pocket.
I agree
And now ... was it worth it? The decision to turn off communication crap at first place was just stupid.
But meh ...
And now ... was it worth it? The decision to turn off communication crap at first place was just stupid.
But meh ...
I agree, very impressive edit.
Edit: Wait, what ... lol
Edit: Wait, what ... lol
Infact, lfs devs should do such polls officially, on the main site (or forum). It would be a big help for them.
Pornography alert! 
Dayumm ...
... they should really put some age limits in there.
... they should really put some age limits in there.
Well, if it gets stuck on my PC - i cant even drop the slider back on the timeline. Its just stuck on the cursor. Might be a bug of flash player, but meh ...
Try changing the steering centre in Options > Control - too. If thats too high, the steering in centre is slow and the more u turn out, the faster the rate gets.
When i try to jump on the timeline, often my video just stops or else it will just not load.
By stopping i mean, it just gets stuck or some.
By stopping i mean, it just gets stuck or some.
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG