This is actually good for a first model. I prefer it over all the other sketchfab conversions.
I think what would improve it, is adding detail to those sharp 90° edges on the engine hood, the dashboard, and some other places.
In real life there is rarely such a sharp angle, so it tends to look artificial. (like LEGO bricks or early 3D games)
It is a very blocky van but all edges still have a small radius roundness to them.
For example see the front corner in this picture: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c7/Chevrolet_P30-Stockholm_%2830059744824%29.jpg
Maybe textures can also help but I do not know too much about that.
Maybe have some scribbled red marker or tape on the RPM gauge.
(As if someone had marked the best upshift point)
Also maybe have the trailer hitch only in the config with roof gear rack?
If I was to race this car, those two things would be my first changes.
(some applies for EMKO)
The setup works normal for me.
I downloaded, double-clicked to automatically copy to LFS and can select it and drive it.
The characters in name are no problem.
For test, I tried what happens if you have an invalid setup file:
I renamed readme.txt to FBM_test.set and copied it to setups folder.
That behaves like your problem: It shows in the list but when you click it then it will select the default setup.
So my guess is, the download somehow failed. Maybe the browser downloaded a 0kb file or such.
Trying downloading again.
They have only a tiny bit less power than your suggested specifications.
Since nobody made an XRT variant yet, it might make sense to start with that and balance it with the other two.
You can also go to https://www.lfsworld.net/?win=stats&racer=zeeaq and click "race last race information" to see all your past races.
Then pick a day from the calender, click on "Details" and the blue "I" (Info) icon next to your name. (Or any other racer)
That will give you a list and graph of laptimes. No split thoughs.
Also I think it only lists races that were completed. Not 100% sure, but I think if the server is set to 50 laps and you restart from garage to do multiple 10 laps practice runs then it will only show the last run.
Do you mean the strange bend of the AI's path in the middle of the turn?
Is that with test patch or normal version?
If it is normal version then try latest patch, it has some changes to AI.
Listed top speed of 165 km/h at max engine speed with 129 kw (175 bhp)
This mod has 298 bhp.
The mod description says "not a detailed replica" but that is a big difference.
Aerodynamics might also need work, maybe too little drag?
Also the original bus is likely not geared for maximal top speed, unlike our setups in LFS.
I am not sure S4 is planned?
All work-in-progress updates are either for S3, for example new tracks or updates to mod system.
Or they are for LFS in general, like updates to existing tracks or physics/graphics updates.
You should post good suitable pictures that show how you are creating the 3D model.
Even without the elegy.dff your screenshots seemed pretty hard to believe.
Compare your pictures to a thread like this: https://www.lfs.net/forum/thread/105673-bmw-3-series-e36
Now you "started over" and again there are no reference picturs, no blueprint that lines up with the model, no video, no nothing.
Just a picture of a 50% finished car shell that you supposedly created in less than 3 hours.
It is super easy to fake such screenshots and sadly too many users have tried that already.
Demo accounts can not sent private messages because it could be abused for spam.
I sent hj93 a private message with title "IncogSalmon wants to contact you" and a link to this thread.
There is a mod for GTA that replaces the fictional "Elegy" car with an Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
The GTA file is named elegy.dff
There is an elegy.dff file in your screenshot.
I had assumed you were talking about slow natural cycles in temperature.
A giant asteroid might had more impact on earth's temperature than humans but such event is so different from man-made effects, it makes little sense to compare.
It seems like something to bring up to be "technically correct" but it beside that it contributes nothing to discussion.
It is interesting how some people are so sceptical towards science. It is the same science that built the computer you are currently typing on. The same science that landed us on the moon and made all kind of stuff possible. Nobody is doubting science when they need to get their appendix removed. Nobody ever said: "That is all fake science, integrated circuits are not real. I will build my own graphics card."
But when it comes to climate change, suddenly everyone is an expert.