Mmmm, the Chelsea one was far more of a 'fluke' though. This Barcelona side is no where near as good as it has been over the last few years. Defensively they are worse without Puyol, and thats even worse based on the last few years!! This defeat was coming for Barca, and it will be interesting to see what happens with them for the rest of the season!
Hmmmm, I don't see how Romney got more votes... Maybe that's who BMXtwins real father is.
And the people the US has killed in 'Gods War' in Iraq.
Allowing religion to cloud judgement is a very dangerous game, and is exactly what is wrong with American politics.
Don't tell me you believe in god and attend church every week.
A broken camera does not explain the nose section moving in the way it does in that gif. 
I'm sure it was a travesty in 2000. Actually that really was a travesty.
Ugh, you just reminded me of the irritating Nick Heidfeld fans that sprung up when he was booted out of Formula One at the end of 2009. Suddenly some were claiming he was a superstar that was somehow unlucky not to have won multiple championships. The same people were thinking he was in with a shot of a Ferrari drive for next season. 
Oh, I always thought they took those gifs from the first braking spot, my bad. Doesn't change the fact I'd like a look at the other cars under similar loading to the Red Bull. 
Hmmmm, yes, but one is under braking, where as one is flexing all over the place over a small kerb. I'd like to see a slow mo McLaren/other car gif over a kerb. I'm sure someone will do that at some point.
Also that image is from 2011, before the current changes to nose dimensions for 2012.
Also that image is from 2011, before the current changes to nose dimensions for 2012.
Exactly, it shouldn't move like that.
Someone also posted this:
Could it be that Red Bull have found away to use the nose to move the un-aerodynamic camera pods while at high speed?
Someone also posted this:
Could it be that Red Bull have found away to use the nose to move the un-aerodynamic camera pods while at high speed?
Could be, lets see what comes of it. ScarbsF1 certainly thinks its interesting!
E: Actually, there could be something in the fact that the supports could be broken, but I don't think the nose should move like that, especially with the ripples in the carbon?
Last edited by CSF, .
Considering the vast majority of camera pods are dummy pods, no I have a sneaking suspicion that isn't it.
Yes we know the winglets were broken, but the nose itself shouldn't have been damaged in either impact... unless you mean the TV camera?
In other news:
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
That's still an unsafe re-join, and still a penalty for Perez.
....you don't think Alonso would be unhappy with that?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xATvuSUOs5c
WHAT MORE I HAVE TO DO?????
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xATvuSUOs5c
WHAT MORE I HAVE TO DO?????
Should Grosjean have gone on the racing line and been wiped out by Perez sooner?
"The bigger part of the penalty was surely for his unbelievable re-join of the track, which wiped out two other cars."
It was all one incident, but the biggest bit was the second part. Hence Stop Go, not Drive Through.
It was all one incident, but the biggest bit was the second part. Hence Stop Go, not Drive Through.
Two incidents were nothing alike. Perez came from a long way back in an attempt to pass two at once, where as Vettel had pretty much made the pass stick and was entitled to the second part. Button realized that he had lost it, so gave it up. Di Resta possibly could have, but from the moment he didn't and Perez wasn't ahead, Perez made the decision to shove him off. The bigger part of the penalty was surely for his unbelievable re-join of the track, which wiped out two other cars.
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG