Quote from Ripley :

Do people read readmes ?!?!?


Are you really waiting for an answer ??

Bloody hell... i feel so stupid right now...:doh:

Quote from morpha :

What's with the new RAC body animations?

?? What body animations O.o?

Works good, but I had to unlock LFS [just for information ^^].

Edit.: Indeed I do not read T_T....

Last edited by Byku, Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:42.

Quote from Scawen :

lfs://join=hostname%20/pass=abc

This link works well, the host and password fields are filled automatically.

(using FF 3.5.5)

In Opera it... well... doesn't work, it says that "there is no application to use with that extension"(or smth. like that).

Question: If someone has FF and Opera installed at once, is LFS only "integrating" with the deafult browser? FF in my case.

Last edited by Byku, Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:57.

By getting rid of locked diffs, devs would cure the symptom, not the cause. The problem is not with locked diffs but with physics right now. Oh... and using locked diff is not unrealistic... it might be impractical (in some conditions).

Quote from Mojo1987 :

Here, i have done some crash tests with my one year old scirocco... maybe scawen can use this for a realistic damage model ;D

(damage was caused by a flying Golf 3, it was not my fault, i get a new scirocco in february)

What the hell has happened? (btw. to english speakers: it should be "what has happened" or "what have happened"?)

Quote from Victor :

You should always keep a backup folder with (just) the files you manually replaced. You must never rely on us being so kind as to not overwrite any files

Rgr ... i had a backup of them , but some other people might not be so lucky .
... and that would teach them a lesson to backup their files .

Umm, just curious question. Some people have updated dds files(high res etc), the installer probably overwrites them? Is there any possibility to have an option to not overwrite high res textures? ^^ Or simple 7zip file would be nice .

Quote from tristancliffe :

Edit: It's like Trekkie and Trekker. Only Star Trek geeks get upset by the difference. Because there isn't a difference.

Hey! Do You have any problem with Star Trek?

Don't mess with us or we'll beam You into space .

JOKE ; )

Propably i'll have to play with msconfig , thanks for advices guys!

Tried everything You have suggested and scanned whole system for spyware, viruses etc. Nothing helped :|.

I've got a pretty annoying problem. For example: I have "my computer" window open in the background, and i'm writing this post. Everytime i press "h"(small), this "my computer" window goes to the front, and firefox is going out of focus. What's confusing, is that some windows react to "h" letter while some doesn't. For example, "c:\something\something" doesn't react to "h" when i go to this folder through a shortcut, but when i go there through "my computer" ("My Computer" -> C:\ -> C:\something -> C:\something\something) it reacts to "h".... of course there are some windows which react in both conditions. Anybody got ANY idea how could i check which program uses that shortcut?

Quote from Dizzydarryn :

...

Now I'll be looking forward to Your comparison between RL VWS and LFS VWS .

Windows 3.1? Nah, just joking. I don't remember any other important systems beside those You've written.

Nice ^^, indeed it is Rockingham.

Very nice, but interiors are too black for my taste , i doesn't see anything on my screen .

Quote from Warper :

To everyone, because i guess Scawen answered that already plenty of times: Will we be able to turn ESP off completely in the Scirocco? Its not like that in the real car - so i am a little scared

Certainly we will, i simply can't imagine that we might not be able to turn it off .

Quote from BlackEye :

I don't know about that stage, but on the page says this (under rally stage tab):

Ohhh... indeed... gravel ^^... well, that still doesn't change the fact that we won't get it .

Quote from rockclan :

The Rallycross tracks will not be included

It's not exactly a rallycross http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxvYO8KuixI . It's simply Rockingham with more cones and special layout.

Quote from Inouva :

O YEAH, me wants, bring some fun into lfs

That's great idea! Someone should do it!

Quote from Liquid Li0n :

I have windows 7 myself and have 3 screen like i said in an earlier post
I changed the setting in LFS with 1 left and 1 right screen, but the screen don't get active, but what I see is that only on my middle (primary) monitor looks like it has 3 different screens on it, you especially see it when turning the car in 3rd person camera mode.

How to get the other screens activated in LFS?

You have to "span" all three monitors in Windows, so that it will show them as single one(one huge resolution)... BUT... it is impossible under Vista and 7... and i have no bloody idea whyy...

Quote from kruuvi :

So you'd rather stare at two screens with the same resolution, only difference been that one is on native and other is not?

Don't take it personally, i'm just trying to get the overview here.

Ok, we're both missing the point here . We're talking about totally different things . I personally use extended desktop, because I have one 17" LCD and one bigger full hd. In span mode it looks horrible. I'm talking about the fact that span mode was(probably) the only way to use games on two(or more?) identical monitors without using sophisticated software/hardware. Deleting such a function in Win 7/Vista was simply illogical .

Edit.: I've also missed Your point in Your first thread, sorry .

Quote from kruuvi :

Span mode would span the taskbar over two screens.
If you do happen to have two or more screens with different resolutions then spanning the screens will just forces them all to have the same height, therefore it's impossible to get good experience out of two different screens.

In my own experience the extendable mode has been more helpful, taskbar isn't spanned over two screen which saves some space on second screen.

But YOU CANNOT use it in games, the games DO NOT detect proper resolution, so they cannot USE many monitors! That's what we're talking about...

Quote from Scawen :

Is there any case for getting your money back?

Fo example, on the Vista box, was it made clear to buyers that an important feature had been disabled and you might be better off sticking with XP?

Should it have been made clear...? Just wondering.

The same thing is in Win 7, be warned . I have no idea why the hell they've done this .

Quote from Neto_r :

...

This is normal .