That guy, "who normally knows what he's talking about", spent a lot of money to go from a 3.16GHz E8500 to a 2.66GHz i7 920 and seems mainly for games???
Did he bother to check any of the gazillion of reviews showing that i7 offers no performance over C2D in most games?
Sorry, but any knowledgeable person would not get 'extremely dissapointed', they would know very well beforehand that at stock settings E8500 will beat i7 920 in most games, and will also OC better. Games are not where i7 excels. Also, his experience with SLI contradicts many reports on the net saying that SLI results are better, sometimes significantly, with i7 than with similarly clocked quad Penryns.
I don't have a recommendation for the case, there's a lot of them and it comes to tastes, and most don't come with PSU, something most people appreciate actually. Perhaps Antec P182 is worth looking into.
I would go with a brand new DX10 card, that one is 3 generations behind, even 3850 might beat x1950CF.
OCed Ph2 940 will beat i7 920, but i7 920 OCs at least just as well and probably better in most cases. I think both are fine choices for the money, though not as good as C2D, but lga775 isn't gonna be around for long.
Btw, TRUE is a better cooler than anything Zalman has on air, and costs ~$80-90
1gb is useful only for high resolutions which that gpu can't handle very well anyway, so generally it 's not worth it when it's more expensive. However, it doesn't hurt either, and since it's the cheapest, I'd say go for it.
I paid ~$30K in cash for the new car last summer. As a foreigner in Canada, I'm not sure I can get any kind of financing anyway, besides those with ridiculous interests (those with ads like bad credit, no credit- you're approved!). They even wouldn't let me have a credit card for long, even though I'm paid fairly well...
Interesting about the insurance payments in UK. For me, there's $0 difference in paying the whole sum and paying in 12 monthly installments, so I chose monthly as I pay a lot as a new driver (they don't care that I've had a license in Croatia for >10 years).
I also avoid loans when possible, but I don't count credit cards under loan, as I always pay on time and never buy stuff unless I could have bought it with cash too.
Perhaps FBM's number is this high because laps from demo players are now being included after the registration for demoers was introduced? Poor XRT then (and XFG) :P
In Canada all new cars are required to have daytime running lights, so I don't really have a choice. It also creates additional hassle for people importing cars from US.
This reminds me: I just checked again, and that bench site still doesn't have i7s in the list, it's been like 4 months now :P. There's no webmaster email there, does someone know his lfs username so I could drop him a message?
I've been running it at 3.60 GHz for normal use, but I may dial it down a bit, as I don't need that much for anything. Although 3.6 is fairly conservative regarding the voltages/temps, 3.8 wouldn't be a problem if I wanted it. I can run benchmarks at 4.0, but it needs ~1.37V+ and the temps are high for air cooling.
The components are in "Post your LFS Rig" thread.
Thanks!
Avg fps in that bench for i7 is about the same as C2D, clock-for-clock. Min fps seem even a bit worse. I couldn't take down the 2nd guy even though I OCed it to the point where it was stable to run the benchmark, but something like prime would probably bring it down easily, not to mention that temps would be very hot... I blame Vista too
Is that LFS Bench site being maintained by someone? It's a bit outdated: no Core I7 and Phenom II. I'd put my entry, but it looks stupid to put Unknown as the model.
Nah, given how little time I have for gaming, it's not worth spending a lot of money on GPU. I might add another 4870 down the road, or replace it with next gen whenever that comes.
I'll post on that LFS bench list when I get the time to do it... Given Eza's charts regarding the CPU cache impact on LFS in the other thread, I think I7 is about the same if not even a bit slower than C2D clock-for-clock.
MB: Asus P6T Deluxe
CPU : I7 920 (+TRUE, at stock speed as I built it just before the holidays and was away for 2 weeks, will OC it later)
GPU : Asus 4870/1G
MEM : 3x2 GB OCZ ddr3-1600
HDD : Samsung F1 1TB + Seagate 320GB
PSU : Thermaltake TP 850W
Input devices: G5, G15, G25
Yep, it's the same guy, with Eduardo out, he was the starting striker for Croatia at the Eurocup. I remember this, it was a UEFA cup match. He plays for HSV now, not badly too, has 7 goals this season: http://www.bundesliga.de/en/liga/torjaeger/index.php
I also wonder about the language in the clip, it's not Russian, and most definitely not Croatian... But it is some Eastern European though.
On my 3rd try trying to be focused. The first 2 tries were 0.229 and 0.200 avg. with the 5th times the best.
Perhaps the startling effect only happens when one is not concentrated enough
Or it stopped being startling after 2 times...
I'm not sure where he lives. I can compare the major components he has at Cdn Comp to the best I know (though I try to avoid online stores if I can):
P6t Deluxe
CDN Comp: $373
Best I know: $349 (Infonec)
i7 920
CDN Comp: $355
Best I know: $350 (PC Village)
For 260 GTX, there are so many variations and brands that it's hard to say. Also, these prices are all for cash, ordering online will cost more, plus the S&H as well.
One other thing, about that 2GB ddr3, you may want to check the voltage, it should not be above 1.65V. You should go for the new triple channel kits that are all ok. Also, do you plan to OC heavily? To use the memory at its rated speed (ddr3 1600), you have to OC i7 920 from 2.66 to 4.0GHz, which is quite a feat even for very good aftermarket coolers. 3x1 ddr3-1333 would be about the same price.
And 'after Christmas' is a bit too far into the future to be looking at the prices now.
newegg.com doesn't deliver to Canada. They launched newegg.ca about a month ago, but they didn't look any better (nor worse) than the stores I normally go to...
Well, yes, that's why I mentioned it since you said that you had asked Victor to provide more logs. There you have all the logs. But the differences are not just one day forward (it mostly is the same day), for example, there's one entry for marcel FXO/so1 on inferno, and 2 on lfsworld as he beat it 2 times in a short interval. Also, the usernames on inferno are all in lowercase.
There's a WR log on Team Inferno's setupfield that goes to like the start of S2 or something. I'm not sure if the dates there are the same as the ones on lfsworld though...
If 0.9~ tends towards 1, then I would like you to write out formally what sequence are you talking about here, i.e. what is a_1, a_2 etc. so that a_n tends to 1. Only sequences tend towards something.
And, btw, infinitely increasing number - this phrase in this context makes no sense. Any real number has a particular value, it cannot have an increasing value. 0.9~ is a representation of a SINGLE number. This reminds me of "1+1 is equal to 3 for very high values of 1".
I know what you're getting wrong and already wrote about it: you keep thinking of 0.9~ as a number for which you add more and more decimals. This is not correct: 0.9~ is the number you get *after* you add everything.
This doesn't follow: 0.9~ is a valid decimal representation - there can only be powers of 10^-n for integer n, no 10^(-infinity) coefficients, so it's not a valid number written in a decimal representation. Look up decimal representation.
And even if you wanted to extend it this way, then you MUST define this as 0. If it's a number, then it has a definite value. What you would like it to be: "A number bigger than 0 and smaller than any other number" is NOT a valid number.
Yes, 0 away
0.3~ is a precise thing in math - a sum of an infinite series. And it is equal to 1/3. 0.1*10^(-infinity) is your concoction with some purported properties that go against the axioms of real numbers.
No they don't, if you are clear on what the representation means: e.g. 0.12 is a shorthand notation for 1*10^-1 + 2*10^-2. This is how decimal notation is defined. 0.9~ means an infinite sum of 9*10^-n where n goes from 1 to infinity. This sum converges and is a well defined number: exactly 1.
It's amusing that you dismiss a mathematically correct proof that 0.9~ is 1 (the one with 10*x-x=9), because you say it uses infinities (which it doesn't, btw) and here you make an argument of your own using an arithmetic with an infinity.
Think about the following mistake as well:
0.9, 0.99, 0.999, 0.9999, ... this tends to 1.
0.9~ is a representation of a single number and it doesn't tend to anything. To have a notion of tending, you need to have a sequence.