I thought this was a joke--especially after 10 minutes of Monty Python-esque rambling about white lumps--but after reading the article, I can't help but wonder: "what if?"
Basically he's arguing that cancer is a fungus (or rather is caused by a fungus), and he has cured it with simple pH-raising baking soda injections, and that cancer is a huge money-maker for the disease-care industry, and doctors and drug companies don’t want to mess with the status quo.
It's actually kind of scary. But wouldn't we always want to believe that the simple truth is being suppressed by rich doctors and drug companies? Nevertheless, I would kind of hope it isn't true, so I don't feel as helpless for not doing anything about it, or maybe so I can keep giving money to cancer "research."
Has anyone heard anything along these lines? has it been debunked? just another conspiracy theory?
No. The notion that there is a conspiracy, involving thousands of people who will let billions of patients die so they can get rich -- I don't find that comforting at all.
That's beside the point (e.g. I doubt 9/11 conspiracy theorists find it more comforting to think that their own government would kill innocent people).
And I agree with that sentiment. I said I thought it was a joke, but couldn't help but wonder at it. I never said I believed it or wanted to believe it—merely interested in discussing it (which we are successfully doing).
Yeah well, I heard the whole HIV/AIDS thing is a scam by latex manufacturers to make people buy lots & lots of condoms. Oh, and there are pyramids in freaking Bosnia. And the world is 6000 years old! Don't believe the Big Science Conspiracy!!one!1eleventy!!1
This chap is claiming that the fungus allegedly responsible for cancer, Candida, is also responsible for asthma, food allergies, depression, weight gain, migraines, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia and vaginitis. Well, he's got that last one right - vaginitis is a thrush infection most commonly cause by the candida fungus. So why doesn't it cause vagina cancer?
A. the reasons people get "ousted" from medicine are usually along the same reasons people get "expelled" from the scientific community: pseudo-science; extraordinary claims with no evidence; "studies" which are biased and uncontrolled; improper methodology; beginning with assumptions and working backwards to justify them; mistakenly conflating coincidences for cause & effect. Until this "cancer = fungus" connection can be reliably proven, repeatedly with unbiased double-blind testing, this doctor and his alleged baking soda cure should be regarded with the utmost skepticism.
If his simple treatment really cured cancer I would expect any doctor worth the term (and especially oncologists) to be jumping on it and using it to treat all their cancer patients, not vehemently denying it to funnel profits into Big Medicine. I know people who have cancer and some who are, for now, in remission. I worked for a short time at a lab in a dedicated cancer treatment hospital in Melbourne. I know that if something came along that could make cancer go away without the need for painful, debilitating chemo & radiation, their doctors would be on it in a second, "profits" be damned. People become plastic surgeons for money; people become oncologists to treat people with cancer. I cannot imagine any self-respecting paediatric oncologist deliberately overlooking an effective cancer treatment while simultaneously looking an 8-year old brain cancer sufferer (and his parents) in the eye and telling them there's no more than can be done and they'd better just make little Timmy comfortable.
B. the only people "profiting" from cancer are cranks who prey on credulous, desperate people who are running out of options. Having a cousin, aunt and close friend who all recently survived three different forms cancer and the associated chemo & radiation treatments, I get really, really pissed off by this kind of bullshit.
C. Mercola.com bills itself as "The World's Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter". Now, effective as many natural remedies can be, a lot of people who use them unfortunately think that any modern medical treatments are not to be trusted, because they're "unnatural" and because people make money from them. My naturopath wife (who's about to start studying medicine - i.e. proper doctorism) encounters this anti-modern point of view all the time and has a lot of trouble convincing people that natural medicine has its limits and that people should be able to recognise them and use a combination of modern and natural treatments - if & where appropriate. More than once, being aware of naturopathy's limitations, she's referred a client to a doctor for a more modern & comprehensive treatment, only to be met with fierce, almost dogmatic resistance to the thought.
Basically, every single "practitioner" that's appeared in my lifetime who has claimed to be able to cure cancer, or proclaimed cancer is caused by an easily-cured and until-now undiagnosed simple disorder or infection (for which he happens to have discovered a cure) has been shown to be lying through his ****ing teeth. Inevitably, they pop up for a while, charge extortionate amounts of money for their "breakthrough", get their fifteen minutes and then slither back under the rug, never to be seen again. There is no reason to treat it as such until sufficient evidence is furnished. Frankly, I don't see it happening.
well he might be a quack but while im certain that hank is right as far as the oncologists who work with patients are concerned pharma companies are generally a bunch of crooks
the lucentis vs avastin bit is interesting http://translate.google.com/tr ... =UTF8&sl=de&tl=en
sadly the tranlsation is pretty useless but basically what happened is that almost exactly the same active ingredient is sold for ~2000€ per injection as opposed to 70€ and one company even tried to achieve a ban on using the cheaper product
its quite amazing how many new drugs are brought to market with nothing new in them and that the companies manage to achieve more and more revenue while selling less pills
