Hello everyone!
I don't personally make resolutions, but I wish to make some requests and some statements regarding driving behaviour and administrative items for 2013. I request that you read it all, and DISCUSS this and more related to this. I did consider making this a REQUIRED READ FOR PARTICIPATION, but will not, unless I feel that insufficient reads AND reaction have been given to this.
Driving Standards MUST IMPROVE
There is absolutley no reason that we should be having massive crashes on Lap 1 of our races. Yes, some incidents are to be expected, but wiping several cars out as has happened in many recent events is unacceptable. I know that it is difficult, but you really do need to take it easy on the first lap, YES do try to improve your position, but DO NOT take big risks that lead to massive start crashes.
Also, generally, we've noticed that behaviour needs to clean up. We do often look at incidents that aren't protested, but do not take action to save resources, or just because we don't have the time to deal with them. I don't really want NDR to be ACTIVELY seeking incidents to protest, I want the DRIVERS to protest what they feel is unacceptable. However, we do hold the right to investigate whatever we want, and if need be, we'll start issuing more penalties. However, who wants that? That would mean that the admins are deciding where people finishes, not the on-track efforts.
Please, work to self-police driving standards, be more sporting, be less aggressive, keep your emotions in check. Contact is of course always possible, but avoid it at all costs. Let's take a case in point: iTCC. That was mothballed partly due to a general feeling of "contact for contact's sake" instead of "contact as a result of hard racing".
If You Enter and Event, ATTEMPT TO PARTICIPATE OR WITHDRAW INSTEAD
If you are unable to attend a meeting of an event every once in a while, fine. But if you sign up to a series, show up maybe a couple times then lose interest and stop showing up? Withdraw yourself. There's no penalty in that. In fact, if you ever do want to rejoin, you get your old number back IF YOU RACED WITH IT. It is more work for us in checking entry requirements, and everything we have to do bureaucratically to have these entries who stop showing or never do show up. It's etiquette anyway: If you get invited to a party, you either say "Yes I'll be there" or "No I won't be there, thank you for the invitation however". We're FINE with one or two total no-shows and no-answers, but it is always more courteous to give a reply all the same.
We need to be faster at the bureaucracy
We do, it's very true. It does take time to go through everything, but sometimes we do forget, or just get too lazy or demotivated. Be it results, processing signups, replying to questions, responding to protests post-race, it does need to go quicker. To this end, is the main reason why I am attempting to make a new NDR website to be able to have that system handle ALL of the mundane bureaucratic items we usually do by hand...taking entries, checking requirements, doing points, confirmations. I have to tell you, the 2012 Kyoto 250 was awesome having the website check the hotlaps and online laps, all I had to do was make sure that was working, and add the sessions. It was SO nice to be able to focus on the racing and not the bureaucracy.
We want to enhance the experience
Along with the new website taking the bureaucratic load off of our shoulders (eventually), that would allow us more time for other things, the fun things that made LFS so special back in the time when NDR started. Better streams, more reviews, more news articles, more community interaction. MoE 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 were the echelon in LFS broadcasting to my mind. We had big admin teams and big commentary teams, the racing teams were helpful, the public racing scene gave sim-racing topics to talk about when the on-track action got dull. Thinks were clicking on all cylinders. I want to get back to that (Wilko says he does too). We need your help, because without participation, it's in vain. But not just raicng. We'll soonish look for people to help on all sides of matters.
Yes, LFS as software is stagnant right now. However, that is no excuse for what's left of the community to just trundle on...whenever the new tyre physics and new content hit our HDDs, NDR wants to, and needs to be poised and ready to handle the probable influx of fresh activity that will bring.
Let's make 2013 a good year!
Regards,
dekojester
I don't personally make resolutions, but I wish to make some requests and some statements regarding driving behaviour and administrative items for 2013. I request that you read it all, and DISCUSS this and more related to this. I did consider making this a REQUIRED READ FOR PARTICIPATION, but will not, unless I feel that insufficient reads AND reaction have been given to this.
Driving Standards MUST IMPROVE
There is absolutley no reason that we should be having massive crashes on Lap 1 of our races. Yes, some incidents are to be expected, but wiping several cars out as has happened in many recent events is unacceptable. I know that it is difficult, but you really do need to take it easy on the first lap, YES do try to improve your position, but DO NOT take big risks that lead to massive start crashes.
Also, generally, we've noticed that behaviour needs to clean up. We do often look at incidents that aren't protested, but do not take action to save resources, or just because we don't have the time to deal with them. I don't really want NDR to be ACTIVELY seeking incidents to protest, I want the DRIVERS to protest what they feel is unacceptable. However, we do hold the right to investigate whatever we want, and if need be, we'll start issuing more penalties. However, who wants that? That would mean that the admins are deciding where people finishes, not the on-track efforts.
Please, work to self-police driving standards, be more sporting, be less aggressive, keep your emotions in check. Contact is of course always possible, but avoid it at all costs. Let's take a case in point: iTCC. That was mothballed partly due to a general feeling of "contact for contact's sake" instead of "contact as a result of hard racing".
If You Enter and Event, ATTEMPT TO PARTICIPATE OR WITHDRAW INSTEAD
If you are unable to attend a meeting of an event every once in a while, fine. But if you sign up to a series, show up maybe a couple times then lose interest and stop showing up? Withdraw yourself. There's no penalty in that. In fact, if you ever do want to rejoin, you get your old number back IF YOU RACED WITH IT. It is more work for us in checking entry requirements, and everything we have to do bureaucratically to have these entries who stop showing or never do show up. It's etiquette anyway: If you get invited to a party, you either say "Yes I'll be there" or "No I won't be there, thank you for the invitation however". We're FINE with one or two total no-shows and no-answers, but it is always more courteous to give a reply all the same.
We need to be faster at the bureaucracy
We do, it's very true. It does take time to go through everything, but sometimes we do forget, or just get too lazy or demotivated. Be it results, processing signups, replying to questions, responding to protests post-race, it does need to go quicker. To this end, is the main reason why I am attempting to make a new NDR website to be able to have that system handle ALL of the mundane bureaucratic items we usually do by hand...taking entries, checking requirements, doing points, confirmations. I have to tell you, the 2012 Kyoto 250 was awesome having the website check the hotlaps and online laps, all I had to do was make sure that was working, and add the sessions. It was SO nice to be able to focus on the racing and not the bureaucracy.
We want to enhance the experience
Along with the new website taking the bureaucratic load off of our shoulders (eventually), that would allow us more time for other things, the fun things that made LFS so special back in the time when NDR started. Better streams, more reviews, more news articles, more community interaction. MoE 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 were the echelon in LFS broadcasting to my mind. We had big admin teams and big commentary teams, the racing teams were helpful, the public racing scene gave sim-racing topics to talk about when the on-track action got dull. Thinks were clicking on all cylinders. I want to get back to that (Wilko says he does too). We need your help, because without participation, it's in vain. But not just raicng. We'll soonish look for people to help on all sides of matters.
Yes, LFS as software is stagnant right now. However, that is no excuse for what's left of the community to just trundle on...whenever the new tyre physics and new content hit our HDDs, NDR wants to, and needs to be poised and ready to handle the probable influx of fresh activity that will bring.
Let's make 2013 a good year!
Regards,
dekojester