1
2
NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisition! Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise.... Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency.... Our *three* weapons are fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency...and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope.... Our *four*...no... *Amongst* our weapons.... Amongst our weaponry...are such elements as fear, surprise....
Are you talking about Axus or Blacksheep's page? I'm running AVG's anti-spybot and didn't get a blip. I ran its manual scan along with Ad-Aware and didn't see anything, either.
The Ads Axus and I are talking about are on the page which appears whenever you click on of the buttons at the top. For instance, clicking the Home button on the page send your to the URL http://[URL="http://www.mpracingleague.netfast.org/"]www.mpracingleague.netfast.org[/URL]/[URL="http://www.mpracingleague.netfast.org/"]www.mpracingleague.netfast.org[/URL] Clicking on Join send you to [url]http://[URL[/url]="http://www.mpracingleague.netfast.org/"]www.mpracingleague.netfast.org[/URL]/[URL="http://www.mpracingleague.netfast.org/"]www.mpracingleague.netfast.org[/URL]/join.htm
Both of which send the user to an ad page. If I had to guess, this site is Hosted and the ad page is the ISP/Hoster's default for 404.
I guess we're having the same hallucinations. I get nothing bu an ad page when I click any of the information buttons. It might just be very, very poor site design. Notice the URL destination on the buttons; they're all self referencing. Odds are that the dude failed to add "http://" in the hyperlink and the web server is using document root as a starting point.
UF1 is much more fun because the races are generally tighter. You can also cave in the front and run on three wheels and still be somewhat competitive.
I got my Bronze running the UF1 ~90% of the time. Still doing it while working on my Silver.
I think what Blowtus meant was that you've only tried these cars a few times at most at your friend's house but are asking that they be "improved". His point being that you may not have enough experience with these cars to know whether or not they are performing. I know for certainty that practicing in the XRG will not let you take the BF1 around the track at a competitive level and it will seem as if the car 'sucks' when it is, in fact, the driver.
(I know my limitations: back marker in the UF1.)
great server, but watch out for some fast, aggressive people. You'll find that there is a very small mid-field. Either people are close to WR's or they are getting lapped. I very much like their 1b server with the UF1.
Might I suggest that you watch a season of the show first? I love the series; much better than Fifth Gear or any of the Commercial-masked-as-a-show that we have here in the U.S.
cautious and erratic. ('scared sh*tless that I'll take out the whole grid' would be a better term.)
Ok. Explain it to me. I thought a license agreement was a "right" to use something in a specific way with certain conditions. LFS goes over this, though, by enhancing the basic product after a licensed is purchased. I can not just buy LFS without also agreeing to use it in a specific way. In short, I'm not buying (as in owning property), but rather leasing or renting it since the extra value can be removed if I do something that violates the license.
What would happen if, as in my examples above, products other than software came with the same types of licenses?
I have a problem with all license agreements, not just the one under debate here. The only acceptable restriction is the protection of original property (IE: can't steal the product, make copies, modify without permission, etc.)
Stating that I may use my own property in very specific circumstances else that property will be made to be less than what it was is more like Renting the product.
If you buy one of my TV's, can I set it up so that if you watch a show I don't like it will disable all but one channel? If you buy my car and drive in a way that I don't like, can I automatically have the transmission not shift out of first?
It should be up to the community to enforce regulations, not the seller of a product. What is mine is mine to use as I see fit.
(Again I want to emphasis that cheaters should be banned and that i am not an advocate for cheating.)
I have a problem with this. While there is precedent for exactly this type of thing (Valve's anti-cheat on Half-Life come to mind), I don't think its right. People have purchased the game. It belongs to them. Nobody should be able to take property away from another individual because they don't like how that property is being used.
Yes, I fully realize that there are a large number of examples where this happens and is accepted by society at large. It doesn't mean I like it.
Banning a cheater from servers is perfectly acceptable.
Yes, I fully realize that there are a large number of examples where this happens and is accepted by society at large. It doesn't mean I like it.
Banning a cheater from servers is perfectly acceptable.
You are obviously playing the demo just fine, which is why you are complaining and demanding more stuff. Buying a license does not add anything which will demand more computing power, so it will therefore play the same way as the current demo.
If you can not play the demo because of your computer, why are you complaining that it doesn't have enough features? It wouldn't do you any good if they released the entire game for free.
It is apparent to everyone here that you just want to leech. The community in general appears to accept new users such as yourself so long as they comport themselves with dignity. You are, in effect, a guest. Proper decorum for a guest is to not make demands of the host. If you had a party at your residence, should I complain that you haven't served more free beer? No. I should enjoy the party or leave.
Why should you pay for my illness? The insurance industry in the U.S. must be overhauled (and its executives keelhauled), but we do not need socialized medicine.
For those of you in countries with such a system; ever wondered why the wealthy go to private doctors?
For those of you in countries with such a system; ever wondered why the wealthy go to private doctors?
If a noob with only 98 finishes can have an opinion: I'd like to see "prototype" cars (LM class from LeMans and ALMS).
(I'd also like to see a server which understood and could score a race where different classes of cars were racing at the same time.)
(I'd also like to see a server which understood and could score a race where different classes of cars were racing at the same time.)
Just 'cause I don't want to be left out: I've put 13 on my UF1 skin. Wanted to use 666 but figured some might be offended.
No more laws. Put pressure on the insurance companies. Put presure on the politicians (like kicking them out of office) for putting PAC (political action committees) before their constituents. We don't need more laws.
If its happening every hour, exactly, then look at all of your programs which update automatically. Windows, any anti-virus, etc. Turn off all auto-updates and see if the problem goes away. If it does, turn 'em on one at a time until you get the error.
I think I was involved in that, maybe. Half the grid knocked out by tail-end-charlie diving into the first corner at full speed and compacting everyone else?
I agree with your sentiments about blue flags. On the other hand, maybe you and I (I'm also a slow driver) need to in habit a slower-paced server. On the gripping hand, I really like STCC and enjoy working towards a goal (points) as opposed to just wining.
seems to me that, in every motor sport I have ever seen, the leaders always have trouble with slow traffic. In many close races the winner is the driver who gets around the traffic best. How many times have you seen #2 or #3 pass the leader because he was stuck behind a lapped car and the second place driver was able to sling-shot around both? I've seen this in ALMS, BTCC, Nascar, motocross, etc, etc.
Slow cars have their own race to win. It is up to the faster traffic to get around them. As the previously mentioned guideline clearly states, the slower traffic should just be predictable.
Slow cars have their own race to win. It is up to the faster traffic to get around them. As the previously mentioned guideline clearly states, the slower traffic should just be predictable.
I'm a n00b to LFS and come from Consoles, also. I'm not sure that agree with your characterization of GT4. One of the things I liked about the game was the high level of customization that would actually make a difference that could be felt. I would very like LFS to have the same sort of thing (beside the existing suspension adjustments.)
However, I do understand that LFS is attempting (I think) to be more of a Racing simulation, and like a real ALMS or similar series, the cars are more or less identical in power and performance. I'm pretty sure that this issue has been hashed out in great detail by the Old Timers in other threads.
cheers.
Hey, people. I'm a noob so be gentle. I'm coming from an addiction to Sony's Gran Trurismo and its hard getting used to damage and the fancier physics.
I've been trying my hand on the STCC 1b and 1a servers but I'm thinking I should probably stick to someplace less serious until I get the hang of things.
I've been trying my hand on the STCC 1b and 1a servers but I'm thinking I should probably stick to someplace less serious until I get the hang of things.
1
2
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG