Quote from ghost racer :

Not at 3k rpm's

No, at 5500rpm for peak hp if you want to be exact.
The point is, torque higher than hp does not = diesel, nor does a low reving engine.

Quote from Hallen :

No, at 5500rpm for peak hp if you want to be exact.
The point is, torque higher than hp does not = diesel, nor does a low reving engine.

I know that.. But the fact that its a 1 liter... lol

Quote from ACCAkut :

There are torque curves for the LFS cars? Where can i find them? (even if they are a bit outdated)

http://www.lfsforum.net/showthread.php?p=324280#post324280

Quote from Roadie :

I know that.. But the fact that its a 1 liter... lol

lol, yeah, you sure don't see many 1 liter cars here in the US, do you? You see plenty on motorcycles though
I guess that small of an engine moving that much weight (relatively speaking) would force you into a high torque at low rev engine. Otherwise, you would be tac'ing out just to get the car moving.

Quote from Shotglass :

dont discuss physics with him
(Roadh0g) seriously... who uses the metric system on the internets
(Roadh0g) 90% of the people have no clue what you are saying :P

Yeah, like only the ENTIRE scientific community.

Quote from Bob Smith :

No, I use RAF exports of the longitudinal forces from a carefully crafted setup, accelerating in a high gear, then apply corrections to try and counteract what I think is being summed, and try and take slip ratio off that (or at least I will when I get around to trying it again).

Sounds good... but you lost me at 'No'

facepalm.jpg

im amazed no one commented on my awesome mspaint dyno graph?