Yeah, I've tried that, and it was still the same. Although, I did only give it a quick glance, maybe when I'll have more time on my hands, I'll play with it a bit more. 
Looks nice.
But that it drops my fps from 300-500 to 30-50 is just hilarious.
Anyway, it's not that useful for me, as it blurs the whole dashboard, I kinda need that when racing.
But that it drops my fps from 300-500 to 30-50 is just hilarious.
Anyway, it's not that useful for me, as it blurs the whole dashboard, I kinda need that when racing.
Your Name: Tomaz Lovrec
Your LFS Username: xfirestorm
Team Name: Proteus Racing
Driver Number: 83
Car Selection: XRR
Nation: Slovenia
Your LFS Username: xfirestorm
Team Name: Proteus Racing
Driver Number: 83
Car Selection: XRR
Nation: Slovenia
Team searches driver:
Car: XRR/XR3
Class: GT3?
Goal: To have fun. Not really aiming at anything serious, as I have been inactive pretty much in the past year, so experience on the drivers side is really not that big of a requirement. Would only ask for clean driving. Only real requirement would be language, English or Slovenian.
How to contact: Best to contact me here on LFSForums, or on our TS3 server: 91.220.156.134 (look for "Tam"), I am usualy found online between 19:00 and 22:00 GMT every week day, sooner and later in weekends.
Car: XRR/XR3
Class: GT3?
Goal: To have fun. Not really aiming at anything serious, as I have been inactive pretty much in the past year, so experience on the drivers side is really not that big of a requirement. Would only ask for clean driving. Only real requirement would be language, English or Slovenian.
How to contact: Best to contact me here on LFSForums, or on our TS3 server: 91.220.156.134 (look for "Tam"), I am usualy found online between 19:00 and 22:00 GMT every week day, sooner and later in weekends.
Okay. Pay half now, half through court of law? 
Wow. :O
This looks amazing!
I can't say thank you enough for this!
This looks amazing!
I can't say thank you enough for this!
Uhm, routers use firewalls + NAT rules to shape traffic on the network. So how can a router be faster than a firewall? :P
Most home routers don't provide an option to block incoming traffic based on source address. Unless you're using something like a Linksys WRT54GL with a modded firmware(dd-wrt i.e.), that you can then ssh in to and write your own iptables rules, I don't think blocking traffic on the router will provide you with much help.
Well, then again, Windoze firewall just sucks for such operations, so I'd suggest you either, find a software firewall for your Windoze machine that can block traffic based on source address, buy a router that is compatible with dd-wrt firmware(or any other that can provide such functionality), or dust of your pre-historic computer and install m0n0wall(i.e.) on it and use it as a router. :P
Well, I've been driving there for the past 3 nights again, and there was always someone in the TBO+LX4 class there.
I've tried to race with the NGTs, but nothing beats the fun of a proper LX4 race.
Sorry, was too busy yesterday, so, the color tones.
I was thinking, use a slightly lighter blue tone on where the original has that dark blue, almost black part, like: #121d5f
Or maybe a dark red: #660000
If it's not much to you, try out both, if not, just go with blue.
Leave white areas as they are, as for the parts where the helmet is red, I'd use a light blue color, like: #3566d5
All colors are in HEX. If you want I can provide them in RGB or any other form.
I was thinking, use a slightly lighter blue tone on where the original has that dark blue, almost black part, like: #121d5f
Or maybe a dark red: #660000
If it's not much to you, try out both, if not, just go with blue.
Leave white areas as they are, as for the parts where the helmet is red, I'd use a light blue color, like: #3566d5
All colors are in HEX. If you want I can provide them in RGB or any other form.
This looks epic. A lot better than my tries.
I'm currently at work, but I'll provide some color tones tonight when I get home.
I'm currently at work, but I'll provide some color tones tonight when I get home.
No, I'd much rather see the helmet without the original stickers, maybe even a color change if possible.
I'm much more fond of blue/white combinations, or maybe a darker red. Your call.
As for stickers, I'll think about it and let you know. If I can't come up with anything, I suppose you can give me permission to add stickers on my own, for my own use ofc.?
And thanks for your time!
Okay.
Then look at it this way.
You have a puncture and you mess up attaching the reserve tyre and the car doesn't start. Logic?
IIS is a web server, it's suppose to sit there, wait for requests and answer to them over HTTP/HTTPS/FTP/WebDAV/...
It's not suppose to mess up the whole networking of the whole system.
That's the problem with M$. A lot of their crap isn't in user space, it's really closely linked to kernel space.
On a *nix system you can mess up the apache code i.e. beyond recognition, and the system would still work, apache wouldn't obviously. But mess up config on IIS, and Windows doesn't work anymore(well it did, just nothing network related). Where is the logic in that.
@E.Reiljans: it's quite obvious you're a just a forum troll. Done arguing with you.
Yes because the process is that complicated.
Create certificate, sign it, enable and require SSL connection. Rocket science.
But no matter how you mess it up under no condition should an application cripple the whole OS. And even if I messed the whole IIS up.
I've done such things quite a lot on apache, the worst that came out that the virtual domain wasn't working. Shocking.
And the dependencies for certain packages are not up to software maintainers, but distro maintainers.
You can clearly download PHP source code and compile it without apache, as long as you have installed the required dependencies.
Well actually I just turned on SSL on two different applications.
And thanks to Apache you can now run a single web server for multiple websites. The big company M$ didn't have that in their precious IIS.
Oh, sorry, miss-read that then.
Apache is crappy?
Tell me then, how did I manage to mess up IIS so hard, that Windoze Server didn't even boot-up anymore?
Vanilla kernel doesn't hold the ralink chip driver.
And I've installed like a zillion of rt* drivers as modules, some crashed, never received a kernel panic. Like I said, only received a kernel panic when recompiling the kernel, which is way out of normal usage specs.
Liez!
I've only seen a kernel panic when I messed up kernel recompile.
Messed up OS design if you ask me.
A bad sound driver on a unix or unix based OS only crashes the sound driver/server/whatever.
And M$ did something to prevent BSODs. They're not showing them by default, but just simply reboot the whole system. So then you have to go digging through the logs, or turn on the BSOD thingy, and hope that the error springs up some time soon again.
slackpkg, sbopkg(slackbuilds),...
Do you need anything better? slackpkg has only officially supported packages, sbopkg, which is only a frontend for easier package management of slackbuilds, holds almost everything else.
I've upgraded the whole OS with slackpkg alone and it's not even that hard, considering you know how to read and follow a few lines.
Well, user friendliness. To me this means that it's simple and easy to use.
Okay, some dirstros aren't exactly user friendly designed, like i.e. LFS(Linux From Scratch), Slackware etc.
But then again, you have stupidly easy to use distros, like Ubuntu(which I am no fan of). But smack me if I'm wrong, it doesn't get much easier than one-click installing apps and I don't know what else.
The only thing not "user friendly" about Linux is the lacking support of some hardware, although this has improved much in the past few years. And I think this could also count into user friendliness, because it is not really user friendly that you have to spend several hours hunting and compiling drivers. But then again, if i.e. RedHat(yes, again), would ship their OS pre-installed specific hardware, I am certainly sure that it wouldn't have hardware/driver issues, just like Mac doesn't have hardware/driver issues with their "own" hardware.
It does not. Unless they are "M$ certified drivers" or "M$ signed drivers", forgot how they call them.
And slackbuilds do this too.
sbopkg downloads the sourcecode and the slackbuild script, unpacks the source, compiles the code and installs it as well.
Ehm...BS?
If RedHat/Debian/Slackware/Mandriva/(any other distro you prefer) were selling the hardware with their distro pre-installed, those too would be 100% user friendly. And since they're not, they're doing a pretty damn good job at being user friendly just as they are.
I don't consider my self exactly a pro, although I am an sysadmin by profession, but I never really had any major problems with *BSD or Slackware or it's KISS principles.
Read above.
Because we're all using our laptops outside in the brightest sun and tend to be upside-down in a weird angle while using our computers and this is very important to us.
In my eyes, 3 weak arguments on why I should buy a piece of hardware at 1.5x the price.
tl;dr
It's just a typical Mac vs PC thread as it seems, but since you started bashing my beloved unix-based linux, I had to stop by.
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG