I guess longitudinal slip does indeed change the aligning moment.
If the longitudinal force rises with longitudinal slip (up to a certain point) the contact patch moves. (For example, if you're braking, the contact patch moves backwards relative to the wheel.)
If you're then turning, the point where the lateral force is acting on the tire (contact patch) is more to the back of the tire, thus you have a bigger aligning moment.

This is how I understand it works, I may be completely wrong.

Here you go Niels.
I used the default setup with TC on (7% slip).

It was one of the first things I did with the BF1, pretty easy.

I was playing around with the cmx viewer and photoshop, bored while waiting for the patch.

Skin by ArosaMike (as said in the pic )

Quote from Pablo.CZ :

Stepless rewind isnt possible because of way how replay data is interpreted. But 30s steps are relatively "easy" to do.

What if LFS could record a ISI/Papyrus-like replay from the SPR and MPR files, storing it temporarily on your harddisk.
Then the replay files will still be small enough for lfsworld and we can rewind them. We wouldn't have to wait a year for the next physics patch either.
It seems logical or am I missing something?

Congratulations

Quote from ajp71 :

Yes there is, if your seriously this stupid then we deserve the flat tire award.

And I was thinking these are game awards.

Happy birthday Scawen

Quote from MAGGOT :

That was my thought too... Xbox was crap, Xbox 360 will be equally crap. I've seen some of the games on it first hand, and its just flashy textures, same crappy blocky models. When UT2007 hits the shelves, it will have multi-MILLION poly models. Plus, it will still run on todays higher-end systems.

UT2007 will not have multi-million poly models, it will use the same flashy textures (normal maps) that those xbox360 games use.

Quote from thisnameistaken :

Good point! I'd almost completely separated "playstation" from "sony" in my mind before you posted this. Now I'm not buying a PS3

Read what Gabkicks said
http://www.lfsforum.net/showthread.php?p=44174#post44174

Quote from tristancliffe :

Where did he mention voice chat?

Does that matter? Whether he mentioned it or not doesn't change anything about how sad your post was.

He actually didn't mention it, it was more a suggestion from myself. If there was voice chat, he would be able to let others hear his music.

Quote from jtr99 :

Levi, is that Ronnie Petersen in your avatar?

It's Villeneuve

boyracerd, ingame voice communication would be nice, but only if you could mute other people. I'd like an Evo for rallying, but the developers would have to pay for a license to get the car in, so it's probably not gonna happen any time soon.

and tristancliffe, you are seriously pathetic (unless you somehow know if boyracerd is trolling on purpose)

Quote from Fonnybone :

I'm not sure how an asymetric setup will 'cure' oversteer

because the default setups have asymmetric weight distribution (driver is sitting on the left/right front), you compensate for that with adjusting individual corner suspension
search for corner balancing on google

(I may be wrong, but it seems quite logical)

Quote from CasseBent :

last I checked, spamming links to the same shitty cars all day isn't talking

Quote from CasseBent :

Levi used the word spam, so I did too. He's obviously never been in the channel though.

I used the word spam the same way as you did (posting alot of links to stuff). What DoN does with his rally pics.
If we use Tweak's definition of spam, then there's nothing wrong with Vrooom, Zeeall or DoN.

Quote from thd :

We are pretty consequent. The channel activity of these two have no comparison. If anyone else had been behaving the same, he/she too would be forced to leave.

I don't know too much about Zeeall, but on Vrooom I have to agree with DoN. Vrooom wasn't more annoying than anyone else, just brought life into the channel. Pity that being too active is forbidden.

Quote from thd :

Nice Gilles Villeneuve avatar btw

Thanks

Quote from CasseBent :

Don, didn't you say that we should bring them back so the channel could be more active ? I assume you'd answer yes to this, since you woulnd't want to lie. With this in mind, why would you be miffed about people talking about other stuff ? It's not like LFS has any volvos or minis (granted, almost has a mini, but it sure as whipped cream wasn't the car vrooom was linking to).

I think DoN is only trying to say you guys should be consequent. If you don't ban people who spam the song they're playing, you shouldn't ban vrooom or zeeall for talking/spamming links about cars.

Quote from detail :

I think they'd better have make the cars even less aerodynamic efficient, with more drag to make slipstreaming easier.

I thought rear drag is exactly what they don't want, because it would make following/overtaking in corners harder.

Great race to watch, so much more fun than watching Formula 1.
But they can improve on a few things,..
Instead of a boost button give em a manual gearbox and clutch.
Make it 1 race instead of 2, seeing a guy stand on the podium twice is stupid. (there should be one GRAND prix instead of one and a half,.. or atleast give more points for the full race than the sprint race)
Cars need more horsepower, it's less than GP2 now.
Nicer looking cars , like eighties/nineties F1's, hehe

and the noob drivers should be kicked out

Quote from Chris_Kerry :

I really like the tracks Eric makes and I think it gives the game originality, that other games lack.

I like Eric's tracks, but I don't care about originality when the game is a simulator.

whaha, awesome! :up:

http://www.lfsforum.net/showthread.php?t=101

DFP 720 degrees
and old Driving Force pedals as clutch
Only wished the DFP braking pedal would be heavier, threshold braking while shifting down and blipping the throttle is hard with such a light pedal.

hi all
nice to have a forum which is not down half of the time