i think its become glaringly obvious by now that he is either incapable or unwilling to actually think about his position which would be required to answer (probably both)
i dont know the legislation in question at all but if thats true (and there is a chance since that is an unusually level headed logical and non fundamentalism based argument against it) that is a very valid reason against it
first of all you have a bit of a rainbows and unicorns outlook on how abortions work and secondly you are still actively ending the life of something that may or may not be considered eligible for having human rights
so (assuming a foetus has human rights) if it isnt murder it is at least manslaughter
im getting more of a wigga/vanilla sherbet vibe from that image
thats not the question though its always been legal for someone to end their lifes (or at least free of punishment as its kinda difficult to punish a dead person)
the question is should it be legal for someone else to end the life of someone who wants to die
it is a valid argument
if we start from the assumption that a foetus has full human rights abortion would basically be murder
however not allowing abortions in certain cases of crime would legitimize the crime to a certain extent
so it becomes a question of which crime you give precendece to
you must be blind then
at ~0:15 you can see the tip of the nosecone (first 10-15cm of it) deform and break away and by the looks of it its not part of the nose crash structure (presumably to allow modifications to the shape of the nose without having to go through crash testing again)
my guess is the tip not being part of the rigid crash structure is probably made from very few layers of carbon (the small frontal area of it means it doesnt have to bear a lot of load and it should get a lot of strength from its round shape so they can probably get away with a very thin layup) which has obvious advantages considering the nose is fairly high up on the car
if that bit breaks it will lose a lot of its rigidity and will easily bend as much as you can see on the red bull
ive seen a w201 dtm in the flesh and it has a completely different suspension geometry than the production model to accomodate for the lower car
presumably its the same with all touring cars as the suspension geometry on the production cars is designed to work with the car sitting 20cm higher up
im imagine its a lot like having sex as a pensioner
theres an underlying sense of 'this used to be fun' but when youre honest to yourself youre shagging a raisin
ive even started considering buying overly expensive stuff i dont really need that requires a lot computational power only to at least somewhat justify spending all that money on fast hardware
i did the same last winter... now almost a year later im not really sure why since i hardly use it at all
apparently i forgot that all modern games suck
id say your use cases are quite different form the advantages felt by the average computer user
i can think of work related ssd advantages too like receiving simulation data from number crunching servers quicker but i wouldnt consider those to be relevant to the majority of potential ssd customers
yes i do
or do you buy an ssd to marvel at the amazing sequential write speeds that benchmarks give you but you wont ever achieve in a real world scenario because nothing can supply data fast enough for them to matter?
ultimately what the ssd advantage in daily use boils down to is does the ssd remove the lag otherwise present when trying to open your browser and other programs
and that is definitely true for all generations of ssds ive used
heres the thing though
over the years ive owned and extensively used (except for the m4 as thats in a pc i dont use all that much) a 80 gig intel postville (which presumably would be slower than the slowest on that chart) a 160 gig intel 320 a 256 gig crucial m4 and a 256 gig samsung 830 (the one i use the most as its in my main pc) and quite honestly the differences in speed are practically unnoticeable and/or impossible to feel without putting them in identical pcs (which i dont and they are/were all in vastly different pcs)
thats not to say that buying the fastest ssd on the market doesnt make sense but with that little of a performance difference and the higher price my choice would be with the older generation that has both proven reliability and a theoretically longer lifespan
currently the pro is about 80 euros mroe expensive for the 256gig which imho is the sweet spot in terms of ssd pricing and size atm
also yes i read anand daily and yes the tlc will probably be fine but theres nothing that would convince me to buy it over the 830 as the 830 is currently about 25€ cheaper (256 again)