The online racing simulator
Pentagon Wants Packs Of Robots To Detect “Non-cooperative Humans”
This should really be in the programming section but I thought all of you who enjoy coding may like to take up the challenge.

This should attract all future Skynet employees.


The Pentagon has put out a request to contractors to develop teams of robots that can search for, detect and track “non-cooperative” humans in “pursuit/evasion scenarios”.
The request, which can be read on the Department of Defense Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program website here, calls for a “Multi-Robot Pursuit System” to be operated by one person.

The proposal describes the need to

“…develop a software/hardware suit that would enable a multi-robot team, together with a human operator, to search for and detect a non-cooperative human subject.

The main research task will involve determining the movements of the robot team through the environment to maximize the opportunity to find the subject, while minimizing the chances of missing the subject. If the operator is an active member of the search team, the software should minimize the chance that the operator may encounter the subject.”

It is seemingly important to the Pentagon that the operator should not have to come into contact with the person being chased down by the machines.

The description continues:

“The software should maintain awareness of line-of-sight, as well as communication and sensor limits. It will be necessary to determine an appropriate sensor suite that can reliably detect human presence and is suitable for implementation on small robotic platforms.”


Paul Marks at The New Scientist points out that given the propensity to adapt this kind of military style technology for domestic purposes such as crowd control, the proposal is somewhat concerning.

“…how long before we see packs of droids hunting down pesky demonstrators with paralysing weapons? Or could the packs even be lethally armed?” Marks asks.

Marks interviewed Steve Wright, an expert on police and military technologies, from Leeds Metropolitan University, who commented:

“The giveaway here is the phrase ‘a non-cooperative human subject’.

What we have here are the beginnings of something designed to enable robots to hunt down humans like a pack of dogs. Once the software is perfected we can reasonably anticipate that they will become autonomous and become armed.
We can also expect such systems to be equipped with human detection and tracking devices including sensors which detect human breath and the radio waves associated with a human heart beat. These are technologies already developed.”
Indeed, noted as PHASE III on the Pentagon proposal is the desire to have the robots developed to “intelligently and autonomously search”.

Earlier this year another top robotics expert, Noel Sharkey, Professor of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics at the University of Sheffield, warned listeners to the Alex Jones show that the world may be sleepwalking into a potentially lethal technocracy and has called for safeguards on such technology to be put into place.

Professor Sharkey stated:

“If you have an autonomous robot then it’s going to make decisions who to kill, when to kill and where to kill them. The scary thing is that the reason this has to happen is because of mission complexity and also so that when there’s a problem with communications you can send a robot in with no communication and it will decide who to kill, and that is really worrying to me.”

The professor also warned that such autonomous weapons could easily be used in the future by law enforcement officials in cites, pointing out that South Korean authorities are already planning to have a fully armed autonomous robot police force in their cities.

Perhaps one candidate for the Pentagon’s “Multi-Robot Pursuit System” proposal is Boston Dynamics’ rather frightening BigDog (pictured above). The latest version of this hydraulic quadruped robot can carry up to 340lb load and recovers its balance even after sliding on ice and snow:




And before people nut off about how this is so much futurespeak, this is an official US Army tender, of course it will only be used for the " Good of Society " We can all rely on that, can't we ?
I watched Dark Angel, she surfed one of those hoverbot thingies to break into the courier place when they where under siege. She's hawt, bring in flying hoverbots so I can watch athletic brunettes surfing through windows.

Scary though, I wonder what the middle managers will tweak the collateral damage settings too.
That's got to be scary - being chased through woods by a team to 5 or 6 robots.

They should make them look like shiny metal tigers, just for the effect Big grin
Ray (Fahrenheit 451) Bradbury's got a lot to answer for right about now...
Pentagon - please do something useful. Put this technology to good use ... we want another series of Robot Wars Big grin
I dont suppose that the Governor of California had anything to do with this...did he?

IIRC He did say that he would be back!
#8 - lerts
ha youre crazier than me
:elefant:
The mechanical Hound slept but did not sleep, lived but did not live in its gently humming, gently vibrating, softly illuminated kennel back in a dark corner of the fire house. The dim light of one in the morning, the moonlight from the open sky framed through the great window, touched here and there on the brass and copper and the steel of the faintly trembling beast. Light flickered on bits of ruby glass and on sensitive capillary hairs in the nylon-brushed nostrils of the creature that quivered gently, its eight legs spidered under it on rubber padded paws.
Quote from Electrik Kar :The mechanical Hound slept but did not sleep, lived but did not live in its gently humming, gently vibrating, softly illuminated kennel back in a dark corner of the fire house. The dim light of one in the morning, the moonlight from the open sky framed through the great window, touched here and there on the brass and copper and the steel of the faintly trembling beast. Light flickered on bits of ruby glass and on sensitive capillary hairs in the nylon-brushed nostrils of the creature that quivered gently, its eight legs spidered under it on rubber padded paws.

Was that from Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?? (Which was made into a film that was prolly one of the greatest works of Sci-Fi in the history of anything! Big grin)
Nah, it's from Fahrenheit 451. Years ago I played the Fahrenheit 451 adventure game for the C64- the most interesting part was the description of the mechanical hounds (which mostly served to kill off the player when you overstepped the bounds of the game world). They were FRIGHTENING.

It was a brilliant game, taken from an obviously brilliant story- makes me wonder why I never picked up the book (by Ray Bradbury), but I think I will now sometime this week. There was a movie made as well but I can't tell you if it's any good.
Attached images
hounds.jpg
#12 - AMB
Quote from lerts :ha youre crazier than me
:elefant:

Not possible, thanks for the new sig Thumbs up
Quote from lerts :ha youre crazier than me
:elefant:

you sure, that thing at least sounds reasonable. But you, saying that we are being watched like if life was GTA and if you kill someone in GTA you kill someone in reality, and that magnet shit, and the umbrella thingy... you fail lerts Shrug

FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG