Ha... A dynamic failing? Anyway, the towers top section didn't have enough momentum to crush the floors directly below like it did, if it was dropped from a height well it may have a chance but not crushing it right from the start. Only last night I watched a Chanel4 program about the 9/11 Hotel, where the hotel beside the towers was actually crushed from falling debrit but a section which was reinforced after the 93 bombings still remained. And that had whole sections of the tower fall directly onto it from a huge height.
So you believe that floors falling on top of each other caused some of the steel to melt?
Not really a good comparison though.
So you are saying that this crushing piece of building came apart as it got closer to the ground but was able to still cursh the strongest part of the structure? These box columns were made of 4inch thick steel. You're saying this falling/crumbling structure was able to crush these columns?
You sure you know what you are talking about? How was the conservation of momentum maintained if it changed direction without anything acting upon it? If you beliebve the internal structure acted upon this to change it's direction, please explain...
If you wanna see something really freaky go on Micrsoft Office or word perfect and type in caps Q33 N and then highlight and change the and change the size to 42, and then you knnow where you change the style of like times new romans change it to wingdings and you should get this
I never said you were crazy, I may have insinuated that you were a mason but never crazy. Each to there own.
So you believe nowhere or nobody is telling the truth? It's all bs? You have some strange theories of your own in your own thread, so where do you get these from? I'm sure you get them somewhere and not just your head, although it could be plausible.
I will say this, the 9/11 Commission report is where all the propoganda about 9/11 started. Atleast the lads who made Loose Change thought they were making something for the people. There may have been some false info in there but they weren't to know that when making it. I only watched the final cut of Loose Change rescently and I have to say it's a huge leap from the 1st edition in terms of accurate information.
I just covered that, it's meaningless, not worth the effort.
ok here is my view. I watched Farhenheit(sp?) 9/11 and i found it very intresting but what is really funny is the towers that collappsed were built to be able to survive the impact of a plane that size. and the explosion that happend seconds after the planes hit the towers was way bigger than the plane could have made and the only way a fireball that size could have being made is by a napom bomb. and also when the attacks accurd all flights in the country were grounded but, BUT, there were a few planes still leaving secretly... who were caring saudi people that were family members of saddam and also why would they want to get rid of saudi's? doesn't Bush say there terrerists? he sent them out of the country becuase the bush family was very very good friends with most of the high ranking saudi's becuase of the oil. and know if this was all planed by the US goverment (which i think it is) i think they just did it so they could attack Iraq and Aphganistan oh and there was NO Iraqy citezen had anything to do with the attacks? and the attack on the pentagon know here is somthing different the whole in the building that was left after the crash was WAy to small for the size of plane that supposedly hit it. the only plane that was that size was a cessna or something. i g2g but i could talk more
Ok, how do you explain him never talking himself on the whole matter, always with Chaney?
Tristan, your can comparison kinda makes sense, but the problem is, nothing was "standing" on the towers like you stand on the can, no force was pushing them from above..
Anyone has any reasonable explanation about WTC7? Still haven't heard a good one, or the passport found... This is actually really funny, we try to debunk how the towers fell and all, but everyone denies that one BIG thing with the passport If that doesn't convince people that it is a set up, there are plenty of other evidence, like WTC7 colapse, aleged "terrorists" actually live and well, explosions from the basements BEFORE any plane impact, etc..
Ok, all your own is hard to believe but I can't tell for sure so I'll have to take your word for it...
The whole US government is on the dark side, imo. They do nothing for the people, nothing. They let the bankers flood the economy with "cash" and take loans from these bankers and the tax payers pay it back, yeah that's a government I want to be governed by.... not.
Btw, bin Laden has never admitted to 9/11 and the FBI isn't looking for bin Laden for 9/11 so why do you think he didn't work alone? Actually, you say bin Laden did not do this alone, yes? So where did you get that info from? And why believe the news, if it's all propoganda bs??
Syncronicity is everywhere but because a certain font shows a plane and something resembling a tower, people use the Q33 thing as proof that 9/11 was caused by some bloke who worked for M$. Or that someone knew it was coming. Now that's bs!! Type Q33 NY to add some extra craziness.
Ok, look up a show from before 9/11 called "The Lone Gunman" and see what happens in that. Now ask youself is that syncronicity or foreknowledge?
I have to say that almost all politicians are corrupt, they all have their own or their bretherens interests at heart, not the interests of the people. And this is in any country, on any continent.
This is true, however what they weren't built to withstand was the blasts that knocked all of the heat proofing off the steel supports, which buckled from heat damage.
Want to know how they towers fell? Downwards caused by gravity, structural damage caused by a high impact, structural damage caused by chemical based explosions and structural damage caused by heat fatigue.
Whether or not it is a conspiracy is a moot point, fact is a lot of people died that day. Lets leave it there.
So you believe that the molten metal was steel? And not another metal that melts easier, like zinc (from galvanized steel) or aluminum (widely used in any office building). Were the reported puddles of molten metal ever analyzed properly?