Quote from Jordan2007 :

You Kept Passing out Because you noticed you didnt have a penis....

good comeback but your mum

Quote from brt900 :

good comeback but your mum

Did you really have to bring this thread's level down to the level of a 1 day old child?

It wasn't even a witty play on words.

Quote from Stefani24 :

Did you really have to bring this thread's level down to the level of a 1 day old child?

Is that a rhethorical question?

Because the answer is pretty obvious when you look at the 2 people who posted.

Where did ma Mudkipz go?

Your mum jokes are so 2006

Quote from JackDaMaster :

Where did ma Mudkipz go?

Your mum jokes are so 2006

Your mum is so 2006.

Also; your mum stole all the Mudkipz.

I need to shave.



This is a great thread for all those little thoughts, eh?

I need to shave, getting a bit bristley.

And I am getting a bit of a beard aswell.

Yeah, the big white beard isn't really your style. hehe

Quote from brandons48 :

Yeah, the big white beard isn't really your style. hehe

:duck:

What? We got two conversations going in two different threads now

What now? Spent all that time trying to find that picture?


I was wondering where you went

From this:

Quote from ColeusRattus :

No.
g is an acceleration value, NOT a speed, thus it would be 0.05 m/s² less. But that's still not quite true, as with the comparative "less", you still need something that the value is compared to.

Having said that, the average g for our planet is roughly 9.806 m/s², while it's 9.78 at the equator, which would mean it's only 0.026 m/s² less. As the g on the poles are 9.832 though, you're somewhat right as your fall over the equator would be accelerating less by 0.05 m/s² than your fall over the poles.

To this:

Quote from brt900 :

good comeback but your mum

Well... this is the "Totally Pointless Topic" thread

Quote from hrtburnout :

From this:

To this:

exactly my thoughts.

Quote from ColeusRattus :

No.
g is an acceleration value, NOT a speed, thus it would be 0.05 m/s² less. But that's still not quite true, as with the comparative "less", you still need something that the value is compared to.

Having said that, the average g for our planet is roughly 9.806 m/s², while it's 9.78 at the equator, which would mean it's only 0.026 m/s² less. As the g on the poles are 9.832 though, you're somewhat right as your fall over the equator would be accelerating less by 0.05 m/s² than your fall over the poles.

I'm too lazy to find the stupid superscripted 2 I know it's an acceleration, just.. that damn 2!