From this:

Quote from ColeusRattus :

No.
g is an acceleration value, NOT a speed, thus it would be 0.05 m/s² less. But that's still not quite true, as with the comparative "less", you still need something that the value is compared to.

Having said that, the average g for our planet is roughly 9.806 m/s², while it's 9.78 at the equator, which would mean it's only 0.026 m/s² less. As the g on the poles are 9.832 though, you're somewhat right as your fall over the equator would be accelerating less by 0.05 m/s² than your fall over the poles.

To this:

Quote from brt900 :

good comeback but your mum

Quote from Crashgate3 :

*pic*

Hey, that toad thing lo-ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD!

It's possible with plasma-screens iirc.

Looks a lot like Vinny's Strijen-layout to me, mate. You'd better credit him, or remove the attachment.

Quote from 5haz :

Am I the only under 20 here who dosen't have a games console?

I have an old Gameboy Advance. Does that count?

My christmas presents will be company and attention.

It's a Volvo 940, 740 or 850

Quote from aroX123 :

Improove my pc hard

and

F.uck

Priorities eh.

I'm going to study hard, work hard, stumble upon a GF hopefully, fix my sleeping pattern, and go to the gym.

That's all.

Quote from nikopdr :

oh hi i have a mclaren F1 on my parkway but im too lazy to take pics of it and i dont have a digicamera so heres a pic of the same car in google i hope you like


http://www.supercars.dk/cars/m ... /wallpaper-mclaren-f1.jpg

*insert facepalm.jpg*

Hurrah! It's snowing!