Am i the only one who thinks that "some online charts" should be based on time, not on distance? Currently it's obvious that fast cars/tracks are more likely to appear in top positions, even if they're not the most popular ones (as in "more people drive them" and "people drive them for more time"), so it's a bit meaningless IMO.

En tiempo?? sería lo mismo, ya que si estás en un servidor en una carrera de 1 vuelta o 2, te esperarías para hacer el mayor tiempo posible y asi terminar la carrera, de ese modo estar hasta arriba del top (que es lo que les gusta a los que estan ahi, hacen carreras de 4 vueltas en ovalo, estando solos o con otro corredor)

Uh.. sorry, I meant the "some online charts" section, for tracks and cars usage only (not "racer charts").

The charts are screwed anyway by the BF1 (formerly FO8) oval racers and people like André and Wusel.

I dont think, anybody really cares about them anymore.

And English, pls.

Quote from STenyaK :

Uh.. sorry, I meant the "some online charts" section, for tracks and cars usage only (not "racer charts").

ahhh ok, it would be another stats, but... for what???
maybe yes... do you need that stats?

Well... it's just that.. if there are some stats, better if they actually show something useful.. right?

so, car usage (show by: distance, time, laps)
track usage (show by: distance, time, laps)
for all stats are completed, for me
is it?

+1 I agree...but there is a lot of distance to show how much of time the FOX has for +9 millions of laps, maybe it could be showed from January 07