To add more speculation to the topic, i heard from a betatester that the track have been laser scanned for perfection.

Think he might be on about rockingham cause the btcc is there this weekend but only on page 1 so i might have missed the point.

Get a hair cut .

Well that crash on lap 10 was your fault Kart, you went for a tight line going over the hill forcing you to into Danas which sent both of you into the tyres and you came out worse, also for that youtube he was still turning because he had no option since your car was forcing him into the tyres anyway so he was not turning into you he was trying to avoid the tyres but your car was in the way.

Looks good i might just try it for the rain since i already have a gpbikes licence.

Quote from 5haz :

Piquet is still a scheming little bastard though, no matter who gets sacked. A driver who will be forever remembered for what he did off track, which isn't right.

So you rather have a cheating scum still stay in charge of a f1 team so he could do it again in the future, i am on Piquet side here because it is still wrong to throw your car into a wall to fix a race result but atleast he went to the FIA to say what has happened instead of letting him stay incharge of a f1 team to cause more trouble.

Quote from DeadWolfBones :

Ah yeah, I guess that'd be it.

So... 4 years.

Alonso on Massa in 07 in a wet race but not sure what track is was.

Looks like Renault could be in the shit now..

Quote :

FIA adviser: In your own words Mr. Symonds what do you recall being said to Nelson Piquet Jnr at that meeting? This is shortly before the race.

Symonds: I don't really remember it.

FIA adviser: You don't remember?

Symonds: No.


FIA adviser: Nelson Piquet Jnr says that he was asked by you to cause a deliberate crash. Is that true?

Symonds: Nelson had spoken to me the day before and suggested that. That's all I'd really like to say.


(...)

FIA adviser: Mr Symonds were you aware that there was going to be crash at Lap 14?

Symonds: I don't want to answer that question.

(...)

FIA adviser: There is just one thing that I ought to ask you and put it to you so you can think about it at least. Mr. Piquet Jnr says that having had the initial meeting with you and Flavio Briatore you then met him individually with the map of the circuit. Do you remember that?

Symonds: I won't answer, rather not answer that. I don't recall it but it sounds like Nelson's talked a lot more about it.

FIA adviser: Mr. Piquet Jnr also says at that meeting you pointed out a specific place on the circuit where he was to have the accident and said it was because it was the furthest away from any of the safety or lifting equipment and gave the most likely chance of a safety car being deployed.

Symonds: I don't, I don't want to answer that question.

FIA adviser: [Referring to the pre-race meeting] Was it you that did the talking at that meeting Mr. Symonds?

Symonds: I'm sure it would have been both of us but I don't know for sure. Sorry that's a contradiction. I would imagine it would be both of us that would be normal. Actually probably more often it's Flavio that does the talking himself. I wouldn't necessarily always agree with what he's saying but the majority.

FIA adviser: Because just to be absolutely clear here what Nelson Piquet Jnr has said is that at that meeting it was you that asked him to have a crash deliberately?
Symonds: I can't answer you.

FIA adviser: Can I say that if Mr. Symonds you'd been put in the position where you were made to ask Mr. Piquet Jnr to crash it's much better, it would be much better for you in the long term to tell these stewards to hear that today?

Symonds: I fully understand that.

FIA adviser: Yes.

Symonds: I have no intention of lying to you. I have not lied to you but I have reserved my position just a little.

FIA adviser: And you're aware that the stewards may draw conclusions from your unwillingness to assist them in relation to what went on in that meeting?

Symonds: I would expect them to. I would absolutely expect that.

FIA adviser: I think I haven't got any further questions.

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/78647

Try Microsoft works . look at the photo abit more and you will get the joke

Love this video, was well made i think.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njyhTcqtmto&feature=fvw

Quote from dawesdust_12 :

I get that much, I just don't know what the hell to change in NKP LFS I'd just knock ride height up a few notches.

It's confusing!

Try playing around with the fast dump/slow bump thingy untill you see the ride height go up, if it affects the performance just play around with them.

What's a good time around Aosta grand sport intermediate w chicane with Fiat 500?

Thanks Fel for the link, saved me waiting nearly 2 hours from filefont, Just waiting on getting some more unlocks so have been playing the demo for abit but it feels so much better to drive from the last time i tryed it so gonna give it a proper go tomorrow.

Like the title says does anyone have or know if anyone has done hi-res texture for the bf1 cause the standard ones are very low res.

Last edited by rc10racer, Sat, 5 Sep 2009 23:14.

Quote from GenesisX :

Are you trying to tell us that a high quantity of memory can make up for the bottlenecks caused by the CPU? If that is the case, case - closed.

No i was trying to say there should be no difference in overclock if you have 2gig or 8gig.

Real Name: Jonathon Pickard
LFS Username: rc10racer
Preferred Number: 23
Team Name: nFinity eSports
Nation: England

Like the later start times, means we can have a longer sleep before race start.

I only noticed it now cause i was just getting a white screen, no error but i guess it is fixed now.

Quote from hazaky :

Well, i think

8gb is a little too much. And also i think that u got ur all channels filled up with ram sticks. The less slots filled = better overclock. But in other hand, more is always better and whats most important is that ur satisfied with it.

Gimma some data to support that theory cause that is utter bollocks, there should be no difference in overclock if you have 2/4/6/8 gigs of ram.

It's on bbc 3 instead of bbc 2 cause from what i can tell a new episode of TopGear is on but not 100% sure.

I don't blame Piquet for telling the FIA about the foul play Flavio did in that race cause if other teams get fined for this kind of thing like Mclaren got from what happened in Australia so why does Renault have to get away with it.

Yea was a good race, Smith's overtake on the outside out Terol into t1 was awesome.

Here.

PROVISIONAL RACE RESULTS

The Belgian Grand Prix
Spa-Francorchamps, Belgium;
44 laps; 308.052km;
Weather: Sunny.

Classified:

Pos Driver Team Time
1. Raikkonen Ferrari (B) 1h23:50.995
2. Fisichella Force India-Mercedes (B) + 0.939
3. Vettel Red Bull-Renault (B) + 3.875
4. Kubica BMW Sauber (B) + 9.966
5. Heidfeld BMW Sauber (B) + 11.276
6. Kovalainen McLaren-Mercedes (B) + 32.763
7. Barrichello Brawn-Mercedes (B) + 35.461
8. Rosberg Williams-Toyota (B) + 36.208
9. Webber Red Bull-Renault (B) + 36.959
10. Glock Toyota (B) + 41.490
11. Sutil Force India-Mercedes (B) + 42.636
12. Buemi Toro Rosso-Ferrari (B) + 46.106
13. Nakajima Williams-Toyota (B) + 54.241
14. Badoer Ferrari (B) + 1:38.177

Fastest lap: Vettel, 1:47.263

Not classified/retirements:

Driver Team On lap
Alonso Renault (B) 27
Trulli Toyota (B) 22
Button Brawn-Mercedes (B) 1
Grosjean Renault (B) 1
Hamilton McLaren-Mercedes (B) 1
Alguersuari Toro Rosso-Ferrari (B) 1


World Championship standings, round 12:

Drivers: Constructors:
1. Button 72 1. Brawn-Mercedes 128
2. Barrichello 56 2. Red Bull-Renault 104.5
3. Vettel 53 3. Ferrari 56
4. Webber 51.5 4. McLaren-Mercedes 44
5. Raikkonen 34 5. Toyota 38.5
6. Rosberg 30.5 6. Williams-Toyota 30.5
7. Hamilton 27 7. BMW Sauber 18
8. Trulli 22.5 8. Renault 16
9. Massa 22 9. Force India-Mercedes 8
10. Kovalainen 17 10. Toro Rosso-Ferrari 5
11. Glock 16
12. Alonso 16
13. Heidfeld 10
14. Kubica 8
15. Fisichella 8
16. Buemi 3
17. Bourdais 2

All timing unofficial

Last edited by rc10racer, Sun, 30 Aug 2009 13:38.