Quote from IMOL :

Here's little something from me guys
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v ... v9MA&feature=youtu.be
Great race

do you wear a helmet also?

Ahahahaha ty id love to see you try to fight harvick

good race, sorry to 73 for spinning you didnt expect you to brake so early. On a side note GT2 backmarkers really didnt even obey class blue flags.. really annoying to get wrecked from P5 after passing a lapped car who then dumps me into turn 1...

a GT1 jumped the start then on the GT2 start some people decided to crash.
apologies to GenR GT1, we thought you were going to go on the right side of us so we went left to give room

thats legal

Session of Incident (Official Sessions for Round 1: Qualifying 1, Qualifying 2, Race) Race
Lap AND MPR timecode of incident (or session time or UTC Time of Day) Leading up to GT2 second attempt race start, lap 2
Car(s) involved; 55, 62
Location of Incident (Track Map Here)
Brief Description of Incident
55 overtakes under yellow between second and third splits

Quote from Bmxtwins :

teamName: Last Lap Motorsports
attending: yes
class: GT1
car: FZR
number: 25
drivers:
- {mindaugas s., Mindaugas Stankus, Lithuania}
- {Berni01, Mateusz Bernat, Poland}
- {masterboy19660815, Thorsten Ulrich, Germany}
- {M Ekström, Marius Rommelfanger, Germany}

teamName: Last Lap Motorsports
attending: yes
class: GT2
car: XRR
number: 52
drivers:
- {nathan246, Nathan Lamothe, Canada}
- {t.nuvolari, Tuomo Jussila, Finland}
- {codelyoko1, Remco Majoor, Netherlands}
- {turkishcan, Cem Dalda, Turkey}
teamName: Last Lap Motorsports
attending: yes
class: GT2
car: XRR
number: 62
drivers:
- {mustangman759, Matt Kingsbury, USA}
- {imudilaskyline, Jordan Lavrikov, Estonia}
- {sobis, Karolis Motiejuitis, Lithuania}
- {Talentas, Lukas Sabaliauskas, Lithuania}
- {Narkoze, Ričardas Petravičius, Lithuania}
- {mountain_dew, Elanas Avgulis, Lithuania}

teamName: Last Lap Motorsports
attending: yes
class: GT2
car: FZR
number: 72
drivers:
- {bmxtwins, Ray Kingsbury, USA}
- {Max-Biaggi, Pablo Santos San, Portugal}
- {Carrossa, Nuno Carrossa, Portugal}

- {mountain_dew, Elanas Avgulis, Lithuania} removed from #52 added to #62
- {gregs7, Greg Laur, Estonia} removed from car #62

no/21/Mustangman759

Last edited by Mustangman759, Sun 27 Oct 2013, 16:10.

Does it not clearly say FZR to XRR? That time was before qualifying began on the 20th (records 1309 est american time) at last edit
Edit nvm looks like jabba made mistake

Front wheel drive nty

yes, but if they make it fast enough or enough decreased downforce then we can have what I would consider could racing in a pack.

Quote from DieKolkrabe :

IMO, remove the plates, BUT find a way to limit the cars top speed. Obviously going 240 like Rusty did in that Nextel test is absurd, but 205-210 is IMO the upper limit as far as top speed goes.

However, somebody else on another board came out with the cars and tracks are infinitely safer so they can go faster argument. That grinds my gears. Yes the cars and tracks are safer.....but drivers still get hurt or worse around the word. Racing isn't ever 100% safe (nor will it ever be). Just because the cars are safer doesn't mean they should run 240 or 250 or whatever they'd run without plates. That's asking for trouble. Carl Edwards got into the fence WITH the plates and we all know how fast they were running in 09.

Bobby Allison went into the fence unrestricted. That was with 1987 cars and tech, running at around 215. Now imagine what the cars would do with today's tech, running 220-230?

Remebmer, Rusty went 230mph in 2004 in a private test and said the radio cut out at that speed (I think it was), nine years on and we have an uglier car but a faster car due to tech advances. 200-210 is as fast as they need to go.

A daytona prototype just set the oval lap record a few days ago... So probably. @phil when your running in another cars draft you won't have as much downforce, they need to make it so they can use the bumpers but not so its a tandem fest...

Quote from PMD9409 :

Concluded: Matt Kingsbury did not watch the race.

Well I did Q for GTWS other than that I watched the whole thing, and nearly fell asleep. But I am 12 because I hate pack racing... K even danica can do it, hell even michael waltrip could do it. Lets make it interesting already

Last edited by Mustangman759, Tue 22 Oct 2013, 02:34.

Quote from JackDaMaster :

??????????????????????????????????? I don't know what race you were watching but the only follow the leader was in the last 8 laps. How can you have an 'epic finish' when the whole field is in single file with half a lap to go and it takes 5 laps to go anywhere unless you are in the top 3. Stupid drivers need to remember that this isn't 35mph tandem advantage anymore.

Frankly I prefer the tandem racing when it can be utilised correctly. I still think its pathetic we limit the speed to about 200, id rather see them up the speed to like 210 or 215 in a test and see what it does.
I hve a better idea - lets fine them for not giving their all in the race and not bumpdrafting, since NASCAR required drivers to give 100%.

Last edited by Mustangman759, Mon 21 Oct 2013, 20:41.

Quote from Rappa Z :

If anyone is pissed about the caution, it's just because they're angry that we didn't get to see what was probably going to be a brilliant finish. I mean once they went single file with ~10 to go it was clear the only action was going to happen with half a lap to go, right where it ended.

What a cocktease.

well we all wanted junebug to win.

Quote from JackDaMaster :

The race was great, anyone that says it wasn't is just proving to everyone else that they think that the race == the finish.

the whole race was follow the leader it was shit. the finish was leading up to a crazy one until poser wrecked.

Quote from dawesdust_12 :

But Phil! If they slow down, they will be less likely to crash! Then the NASCAR fans will riot because a crash hasn't happened in 3 laps!

There was 3 cautions the entire race, 1 for a blown motor, 1 for jpm wrecking at same time as ambrose and 1 for posers wreck. They should be disapointed cuz the race was shite.

Quote from Boris Lozac :

Broken link, again..

you realize origin doesn't push the payment until after game release right?

Quote from Bmxtwins :

LLM, #25 and #52
4096 x 4096
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/r8vaukfgw5i9jmp/HyN93xEQFo

all four cars added hier

Brendan Gaughan moving to NW still with RCR

Ragan gilliland return to frr
Todd parrott suspended for substance abuse

Last edited by Mustangman759, Fri 18 Oct 2013, 03:30.

Quote from tristancliffe :

I don't think it's a strength problem. The steering loads aren't that high, and I think women can develop leg/neck/core strength sufficient for the braking and lateral loads.

A simulator poses very different problems with comparing drivers (of any sex). The lack of cues is a very real part of "ability" being masked.

If there is a difference, then it's to do with spatial awareness, or coping with adrenaline, or something physiological like that.

Why do women want to compete against men in motorsport, but are happy to have women's football, or women's athletics, or women's press-ups? If women want to be equal in sporting terms, then they should be doing so in all sports, or accept that they need women specific motorsport championships.

I agree tbh, theres probably women soccer players who are better than top men players.

not so boring KB

Ok this is not a topic for debating military is it? go make a new thread