That must've been ages ago, or maybe I was just drunk and forgotten lol
As a some sort of audiophile myself, that's an interesting metaphor! Pretty excited actually, though now I'm also considering the most recent release R12 after all reviews say the FFB is even sharper and feels more similar to R21 than R9 :o
Also, didn't know that about LFS FFB. Always sort of wondered if there were actually people using higher FFB in-game coz to me it starts to feel unusable after 20% lol
Also, didn't know that about LFS FFB. Always sort of wondered if there were actually people using higher FFB in-game coz to me it starts to feel unusable after 20% lol
Moza wheelbases?
Anyone using R9 in LFS? How's the FFB like?
I'm looking to upgrade my broken G27 for either Moza R9 or CSL DD 8nm and just wondering which one would be the better wheel for me.
I always used only 15% ffb in-game and 107% from the profiler settings so I'm probably not too interested in the overall strength of the wheel per se, but how it transfers the track details into my hands. In the past I probably would've asked which one is faster but these days I'm just as interested in the overall immersion while driving.
I've heard Fanatec customer service can be a struggle and their quality control may not be the best eithee on top of that. Reading the reviews CSL DD might be a little more detailed with its ffb but honestly if the difference isn't too big I'd probably be happy to pay for the better service.
I'm looking to upgrade my broken G27 for either Moza R9 or CSL DD 8nm and just wondering which one would be the better wheel for me.
I always used only 15% ffb in-game and 107% from the profiler settings so I'm probably not too interested in the overall strength of the wheel per se, but how it transfers the track details into my hands. In the past I probably would've asked which one is faster but these days I'm just as interested in the overall immersion while driving.
I've heard Fanatec customer service can be a struggle and their quality control may not be the best eithee on top of that. Reading the reviews CSL DD might be a little more detailed with its ffb but honestly if the difference isn't too big I'd probably be happy to pay for the better service.
Questions aren't the main thing. They are there to help you to find out your cognitive behaviour. Online tests are never accurate, but it's possible to find the right type from them.
People behave differently and the cognitive functions are there for trying to explain our behaviour. They might not be perfect and it's impossible to put all the people in the world in just 16 different groups, but I'm sure there's some truth in the system.
For example, I just can't identify with Extroverted Thinking (Te). I'm never organized, making plans or schedules for different things. It's so clear that my behaviour is strongly using Introverted Thinking (Ti). I'm usually thinking in my own head without caring about outside things and I procrastinate A LOT. Basically, Te is focused on the external world while Ti is focused on inner world (your own mind).
I'd like to compare Extroverted Intuition (Ne) and Extroverted Seinsing (Se) but it's hard because I'm not supposed to have Se so I don't know how Se-users behave. But anyway, my Ne works as a constant source for different possibilities, ideas, "what ifs?", etc. I'm always interested in new stuff and plans (like travelling to somewhere or doing something) and I'm constantly trying to find/study something new which I thought was exciting.
Don't get me wrong, I see some inconsistencies in the system and I just can't believe everything in it. But so far it's been really accurate description for different people's behaviour, including my own.
If you're unsure about your type, this test is probably more accurate. http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes2.asp
Some people say this is like astrology and you kinda relate to everything but for me INTP is so spot on. I couldn't think of being any other type, it's just so accurate and it even explains why I've behaved like that my whole life.
This one's pretty good too: http://jupiter-34.appspot.com
Got 90% INTP.
Last edited by CardsetCrazy, .
A is for Assertive and T for Turbulent. They aren't part of the MBTI but it's basically telling you if you're more assertive or turbulent. I'm INTP-T (iirc) but I don't really care about it because it has nothing to do with original Jungian theory.
I know this, especially with MBTI. However, I've looked into cognitive functions behind MBTI system and I'm pretty confident there's some truth in them.
MBTI is comparable to astrology since it relies on stereotypes and that letter code itself is garbage. However, if you google cognitive functions behind each MBTI type, you start finding the interesting and IMO, more accurate stuff. Jung's cognitive functions are all about cognitive behaviour. Of course that isn't scientifically valid either but I'm sure it's at least something.
The reason why I didn't mention about Jungian cognitive functions in the opening post is because that basic MBTI is so much easier to understand and you can find your correct typing with it.
Although I'm still questioning whether I'm actually an ENTP, which sounds quite funny because I'm scoring 95% introvertness in 16personalities.com test. But INTP and ENTP are really similar, only difference is that ENTP has Extroverted Intuition as their dominant function and Introverted Thinking as their 2nd function while INTP has them other way around.
What is your MBTI type? - Personality Test
https://www.16personalities.com/free-personality-test
Thought this would be fun to do and see what other people get. I start and say I'm an INTP: https://www.16personalities.com/intp-personality
And that's VERY accurate.
E: Funny INTP stats: http://brandongaille.com/44-impressive-intp-statistics/
Thought this would be fun to do and see what other people get. I start and say I'm an INTP: https://www.16personalities.com/intp-personality
And that's VERY accurate.
E: Funny INTP stats: http://brandongaille.com/44-impressive-intp-statistics/
Last edited by CardsetCrazy, .
New Oasis 
Then some blues
Then some blues
Good bait Racer X! 
I wouldn't touch Fanatec's cheaper wheels. They aren't that good value.
T300 and T500 are both much better than G27 but T300 has worse pedals and they don't have H-shifter included.
T300 and T500 are both much better than G27 but T300 has worse pedals and they don't have H-shifter included.
So much better than their last single. **** psychedelic groove. Just ordered both of their new singles on vinyl.
I like that ^^
One more Chemical Brothers song with Noel Gallagher on vocals I like that Beatles sound
One more Chemical Brothers song with Noel Gallagher on vocals
I like that Beatles sound1996 actually
Their second album is very Led Zeppelin-influenced. Love Spreads is my favourite song from that album but Good Times, Driving South, Breaking Into Heaven, Begging You and Tears sound amazing as well.
John Squire is probably the most underrated guitarist ever. Just listen that guitar playing in Good Times.
John Squire is probably the most underrated guitarist ever. Just listen that guitar playing in Good Times.
Yeah, after 22 years break
Their new single was quite good. Lyrics were bad and too "poppy" but that guitar!Haha, just a joke from me
It's originally a hidden track in the end of their 2nd and last album (so far).New Stone Roses single coming out tonight! I'm really really excited.
Couldn't watch the new trailer (not available in my country) so I just pressed the dislike button...
I thought it's the opposite...
It looks like there's more grip on gravel than tarmac That video I mean.
That video I mean.Looks like this thread just backfired. Why aren't USA using vans and trailers instead of pickups?
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG