Yes exactly, let's make up imaginary unrealistic scenarios to try and convince others to agree with my stance on not wanting to add features to a video game.
Jesus christ
Just say you personally don't want this feature and move on, no need for the hysterics.
Man this forum keeps on coming up with new ways to dumbfound me...
With that logic, the millions of kids worldwide who played GTA or Call of Duty should be shooting everyone they see in the streets? Get over yourself lol
Last edited by Scawen, .
Reason : removing quoted word
Not an LFS issue, a $50-100 computer from Facebook Marketplace/Gumtree/Craigslist will be able to run it.
It's like complaining Grand Theft Auto 6 doesn't run on your Playstation 2... Get a PC from the past 10 years and you won't have any issues, if you refuse to upgrade from a dual core Windows Vista-era PC then that's on you.
"people who've abandoned it" Dude, people can't play the same game for decades with slow updates, minimal developers, no publisher and no 3rd party platform support. It's not abandoning when the developers practically encourage the community to die off.
It should've been added to Steam a decade ago, that's not the on the users. That's a developer problem...
Any computer made in the past decade will run it fine, anyone who will complain needs to upgrade their PC. There's PCs on Facebook Marketplace for $50-100 that will run this game for many years to come.
30% revenue to Valve on the thousands of new sales is still a large profit increase, would've been tens of thousands of new sales had it been added to Steam many years ago like has been suggested numerous times on the forums throughout the years.
But also Scawen has said repeatedly that LFS on Steam would've work with his development infrastructure and how he develops the game, which is understandable and fair enough. There's pros and cons to be sides of the argument with no easy answer either way.